Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Symmetry obstructions
Main exclusion. Section 3 excludes every one-point extension transitive on the old vertices for , without assuming a regular or abelian action. It supersedes the abelian restriction in Section 2.
Construction-family exclusions, not positive cases of the unrestricted problem. Set . A hypothetical counterexample has for every color. A least color contains a , by the checked localized independence inequality in Packing tools. Distinct monochromatic 's have disjoint edge sets, even when their colors differ.
1. No vertex-transitive action, even with permuted colors
Suppose a group acts transitively on vertices and permutes the colors. Choose a full clique in a least color and let its -orbit have members. Transitivity gives a common vertex incidence and
Since , . Edge disjointness gives
Thus . If is the orbit size of the chosen color, its isomorphic least colors each contain of these cliques. Hence
For , neither nor divides : and .
For , necessarily . These two least colors each have at least 15 edges, so all three colors have exactly 15 edges. The remaining color is -invariant and thus 3-regular on ten vertices. Its forbidden and Brooks's theorem yield an independent four-set, again a contradiction.
This excludes all vertex-transitive constructions, not merely those in which translations preserve each individual color graph.
2. Abelian-equivariant one-point extensions
Theorem. Let and let be any abelian group of order . There is no counterexample on equivariant under the regular action of on itself, fixing and possibly permuting colors. No old-edge coloring is prescribed.
This strengthens the earlier prime-field exclusion to every abelian regular action of the stated order, including all prime-power affine translation actions. It still excludes only a construction family.
The star action must be transitive on colors
Let be the number of colors used at . These colors form one orbit of the color action. The localized independence bound gives
for each star color. For any nonstar color, is isolated, so its old graph has independence at most . Applying the same bound to its old vertices gives
Here the clique-number bound is in both applications. Since , if then
contrary to the total edge count. Thus .
Suppose . The common stabilizer of a star color has order , where (the upper bound follows from ). Consider a full clique of a star color. If a nonzero stabilizes , then lies in one -coset: for any , the edges and have the same color, so the translation fixes that color and belongs to . All -translates of then lie in one -set. Any two intersect in at least vertices, so are equal by full-clique intersection rigidity. This would make -invariant, impossible because .
A full clique containing cannot occur either. Its translation stabilizer acts freely on its old points, so its order divides both and and is one. Its distinct translates would use distinct edges at .
Consequently a star-color full clique, if one existed, would have trivial stabilizer in : its stabilizer must preserve its color and therefore lie in . Its translates consume pairwise disjoint edges, all in star colors. Only edges remain, fewer than needed by even one nonstar color. Thus no star color contains a full clique.
Using clique number at most improves its bound to
For , , so already , a contradiction. We have proved . Hence has order , fixes every color, and every color has exactly edges.
A free orbit gives an independent transversal
No full clique contains , as proved above. If every full clique were -fixed, it would be an -coset. Each old vertex would then lie in full cliques of at most one color, contrary to from Packing tools. Choose a non--fixed full clique . The same edge-translation argument shows its -stabilizer is trivial: a nontrivial stabilizer would place its vertices in one -coset and therefore make it -fixed. Its orbit consists of edge-disjoint cliques of one color.
Let be the number of -cosets missed by . The union of these cosets consists of vertices outside all orbit cliques. Turán's lower bound on this union and the internal orbit-clique edges give
If an occupied coset contains points of , each such point lies in orbit cliques. The occupancies sum to over cosets; hence their excess over one totals , and at most points in each orbit clique are shared. Delete the shared points and its at most one neighbor of in this color. The remaining parts are disjoint, avoid , and have size at least
Their cross edges lie outside the orbit-clique edge sets and number at most . For , and . Independent uniform representatives have expected target-edge count at most . Some choice is an independent -set, which augments to a forbidden -set.
The orbit, stabilizer, edge-budget, and numerical steps received a separate check. Nothing here excludes arbitrary asymmetric colorings or unrestricted nonabelian one-point actions. The latter limitation is removed by the following theorem.
3. Arbitrary transitive one-point extensions
Theorem. For , no E617 counterexample admits a group fixing a vertex , acting transitively on the other vertices, and possibly permuting colors. No regular subgroup is assumed.
Write . We use the full palettes and safe-clique deletion lemma from Critical components, the localized independence inequality, and the full-clique extension lemma with overlaps. The last lemma extends an independent set outside full cliques by one representative from each whenever . Its representatives are chosen only among vertices private to their clique in the family; ordinary greedy selection on overlapping cliques would not suffice.
Star fibers and clique orbits
Every color occurs at . Transitivity on the old vertices therefore implies transitivity on colors. Every color has edges, each star fiber has order , and its color stabilizer is transitive on . Every color has a full clique: otherwise its average degree and clique number at most would give .
No full clique contains . If its orbit has members, old-vertex transitivity gives for a positive integer . Hence . The orbit cliques have disjoint star-edge sets, so , a contradiction.
Suppose a full color- clique meets . It meets it exactly once, by the outsider cap at . Every clique in its -orbit does likewise. Transitivity on gives orbit size with . Since , one has and therefore .
Let be the number of old vertices outside the union of these cliques. It is also their total overlap, since their total vertex incidence is . Tur'an on the uncovered vertices gives
Thus satisfies , and . Orbit transitivity makes the shared-vertex count the same in each clique. If counts orbit cliques through a vertex, then
Remove the shared vertices and the unique vertex in from each clique. The remaining disjoint parts have order at least
Their cross edges lie outside all orbit-clique edge sets, so number at most . Uniform independent representatives have expected conflict count below one. Some transversal is independent and avoids ; adjoining is a contradiction.
Consequently all color- full cliques lie in
Divisible overlap forces disjointness
Let be the common number of full cliques per color and let be the common order of their union. Old-vertex transitivity makes the number of these color unions through an old vertex constant. Counting gives , hence . Thus the total same-color overlap
is a nonnegative multiple of .
If , choose full cliques in with overlap . The overlap extension lemma makes their remainder have independence at most one: an independent pair would extend to vertices in . That remainder has order . The clique cap forces and makes the remainder a . Thus partitions into full cliques. Any other full clique, if different from all these blocks, meets each block in at most one vertex and cannot have order . These are therefore all the full cliques, and they are disjoint.
If , remove all full cliques from and put . The remainder satisfies
The first independence bound again uses extension at total size , not . The localized inequality gives
The star edges and the edge-disjoint clique-internal edges give
Upper minus lower is
negative if . Divisibility forces . Thus every color's full cliques are disjoint, and (1) gives .
Safe isolation and the final incidence equation
In each color sequentially delete all edges leaving its full cliques, leaving those pairs uncolored. The safe-clique lemma preserves independence at most ; the budget only decreases, and same-color disjointness preserves every other full clique. The outsider cap and hereditary caps persist. Every original full clique becomes a component.
A foreign full clique is an independent -set in the target color. It must meet every target full component, since omitting a component would allow one more independent vertex. The intersections have order exactly one.
The original invariant family has cliques of order on old vertices. Old-vertex transitivity gives exactly full cliques through each old vertex, now known to have distinct colors. Counting intersecting pairs of differently colored full cliques gives
As , this forces , contradicting .
The full proof, including the removal of the regular-action assumption, was checked by the author and is author-recorded. It excludes the nonabelian one-point template in Construction attempts for every . It does not exclude asymmetric colorings or prove any new unrestricted positive case of E617.