Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Symmetry obstructions


Main exclusion. Section 3 excludes every one-point extension transitive on the r2r^2 old vertices for r≥100r\ge100, without assuming a regular or abelian action. It supersedes the abelian restriction in Section 2.

Construction-family exclusions, not positive cases of the unrestricted problem. Set N=r2+1N=r^2+1. A hypothetical counterexample has α(Gi)≤r\alpha(G_i)\le r for every color. A least color contains a KrK_r, by the checked localized independence inequality in Packing tools. Distinct monochromatic KrK_r's have disjoint edge sets, even when their colors differ.

1. No vertex-transitive action, even with permuted colors

Suppose a group Γ\Gamma acts transitively on vertices and permutes the colors. Choose a full clique in a least color and let its Γ\Gamma-orbit have MM members. Transitivity gives a common vertex incidence tt and

rM=Nt.rM=Nt.

Since gcd⁡(r,N)=1\gcd(r,N)=1, N∣MN\mid M. Edge disjointness gives

M(r2)≤(N2),M≤Nrr−1<2N.M\binom r2\le\binom N2, \qquad M\le\frac{Nr}{r-1}<2N.

Thus M=NM=N. If ℓ\ell is the orbit size of the chosen color, its ℓ\ell isomorphic least colors each contain N/ℓN/\ell of these cliques. Hence

ℓ∣N,Nℓ(r2)≤rN2,r−1≤ℓ≤r.\ell\mid N,\qquad \frac{N}{\ell}\binom r2\le\frac{rN}{2}, \qquad r-1\le\ell\le r.

For r≥4r\ge4, neither rr nor r−1r-1 divides NN: N≡1(modr)N\equiv1\pmod r and N≡2(modr−1)N\equiv2\pmod{r-1}.

For r=3r=3, necessarily ℓ=2\ell=2. These two least colors each have at least 15 edges, so all three colors have exactly 15 edges. The remaining color is Γ\Gamma-invariant and thus 3-regular on ten vertices. Its forbidden K4K_4 and Brooks's theorem yield an independent four-set, again a contradiction.

This excludes all vertex-transitive constructions, not merely those in which translations preserve each individual color graph.

2. Abelian-equivariant one-point extensions

Theorem. Let r≥101r\ge101 and let AA be any abelian group of order r2r^2. There is no counterexample on A∪{∞}A\cup\{\infty\} equivariant under the regular action of AA on itself, fixing ∞\infty and possibly permuting colors. No old-edge coloring is prescribed.

This strengthens the earlier prime-field exclusion to every abelian regular action of the stated order, including all prime-power affine translation actions. It still excludes only a construction family.

The star action must be transitive on colors

Let tt be the number of colors used at ∞\infty. These colors form one orbit of the color action. The localized independence bound gives

2e(Gi)≥L:=r3−r2+3r−1+2/r2e(G_i)\ge L:=r^3-r^2+3r-1+2/r

for each star color. For any nonstar color, ∞\infty is isolated, so its old graph has independence at most r−1r-1. Applying the same bound to its r2r^2 old vertices gives

2e(Gj)≥U:=r3+r2+2r2r−1.2e(G_j)\ge U:=r^3+r^2+\frac{2r^2}{r-1}.

Here the clique-number bound is rr in both applications. Since U>LU>L, if t≤r/2t\le r/2 then

∑i2e(Gi)≥r2(L+U)>r4+r2,\sum_i2e(G_i)\ge\frac r2(L+U)>r^4+r^2,

contrary to the total edge count. Thus t>r/2t>r/2.

Suppose t<rt<r. The common stabilizer HH of a star color has order h=r2/th=r^2/t, where r<h≤2r−2r<h\le2r-2 (the upper bound follows from t≥⌊r/2⌋+1t\ge\lfloor r/2\rfloor+1). Consider a full clique QQ of a star color. If a nonzero s∈Hs\in H stabilizes QQ, then QQ lies in one HH-coset: for any x,y∈Qx,y\in Q, the edges {x,x+s}\{x,x+s\} and {y,y+s}\{y,y+s\} have the same color, so the translation y−xy-x fixes that color and belongs to HH. All HH-translates of QQ then lie in one hh-set. Any two intersect in at least 2r−h≥22r-h\ge2 vertices, so are equal by full-clique intersection rigidity. This would make QQ HH-invariant, impossible because h>rh>r.

A full clique containing ∞\infty cannot occur either. Its translation stabilizer acts freely on its r−1r-1 old points, so its order divides both r−1r-1 and r2r^2 and is one. Its r2r^2 distinct translates would use r2(r−1)>r2r^2(r-1)>r^2 distinct edges at ∞\infty.

Consequently a star-color full clique, if one existed, would have trivial stabilizer in AA: its stabilizer must preserve its color and therefore lie in HH. Its r2r^2 translates consume r2(r2)r^2\binom r2 pairwise disjoint edges, all in star colors. Only r2(r+1)/2r^2(r+1)/2 edges remain, fewer than U/2U/2 needed by even one nonstar color. Thus no star color contains a full clique.

Using clique number at most r−1r-1 improves its bound to

2e(Gi)≥L′=r3+3r+2/r.2e(G_i)\ge L'=r^3+3r+2/r.

For r≥3r\ge3, U>L′U>L', so already ∑i2e(Gi)≥rL′>r4+r2\sum_i2e(G_i)\ge rL'>r^4+r^2, a contradiction. We have proved t=rt=r. Hence HH has order rr, fixes every color, and every color has exactly r(r2+1)/2r(r^2+1)/2 edges.

A free orbit gives an independent transversal

No full clique contains ∞\infty, as proved above. If every full clique were HH-fixed, it would be an HH-coset. Each old vertex would then lie in full cliques of at most one color, contrary to ∑vm(v)≥2(r2+1)\sum_v m(v)\ge2(r^2+1) from Packing tools. Choose a non-HH-fixed full clique QQ. The same edge-translation argument shows its HH-stabilizer is trivial: a nontrivial stabilizer would place its rr vertices in one HH-coset and therefore make it HH-fixed. Its orbit consists of rr edge-disjoint cliques of one color.

Let mm be the number of HH-cosets missed by QQ. The union of these cosets consists of mrmr vertices outside all orbit cliques. Turán's lower bound on this union and the internal orbit-clique edges give

r(m2)+r(r2)≤r(r2+1)2,m(m−1)≤r+1.r\binom m2+r\binom r2\le\frac{r(r^2+1)}2, \qquad m(m-1)\le r+1.

If an occupied coset contains kk points of QQ, each such point lies in kk orbit cliques. The occupancies sum to rr over r−mr-m cosets; hence their excess over one totals mm, and at most 2m2m points in each orbit clique are shared. Delete the shared points and its at most one neighbor of ∞\infty in this color. The remaining rr parts are disjoint, avoid Ni(∞)N_i(\infty), and have size at least

w=r−2m−1≥r−2r−3.w=r-2m-1\ge r-2\sqrt r-3.

Their cross edges lie outside the orbit-clique edge sets and number at most B=r(r+1)/2B=r(r+1)/2. For r≥100r\ge100, w≥0.77rw\ge0.77r and B≤0.505r2<w2B\le0.505r^2<w^2. Independent uniform representatives have expected target-edge count at most B/w2<1B/w^2<1. Some choice is an independent rr-set, which ∞\infty augments to a forbidden (r+1)(r+1)-set.

The orbit, stabilizer, edge-budget, and numerical steps received a separate check. Nothing here excludes arbitrary asymmetric colorings or unrestricted nonabelian one-point actions. The latter limitation is removed by the following theorem.

3. Arbitrary transitive one-point extensions

Theorem. For r≥100r\ge100, no E617 counterexample admits a group fixing a vertex ∞\infty, acting transitively on the other r2r^2 vertices, and possibly permuting colors. No regular subgroup is assumed.

Write E0=r(r2+1)/2E_0=r(r^2+1)/2. We use the full palettes and safe-clique deletion lemma from Critical components, the localized independence inequality, and the full-clique extension lemma with overlaps. The last lemma extends an independent set II outside ff full cliques by one representative from each whenever ∣I∣+f≤r|I|+f\le r. Its representatives are chosen only among vertices private to their clique in the family; ordinary greedy selection on overlapping cliques would not suffice.

Star fibers and clique orbits

Every color occurs at ∞\infty. Transitivity on the old vertices therefore implies transitivity on colors. Every color has E0E_0 edges, each star fiber Si=Ni(∞)S_i=N_i(\infty) has order rr, and its color stabilizer HiH_i is transitive on SiS_i. Every color has a full clique: otherwise its average degree rr and clique number at most r−1r-1 would give α(Gi)≥(r2+1)/r>r\alpha(G_i)\ge(r^2+1)/r>r.

No full clique contains ∞\infty. If its orbit has LL members, old-vertex transitivity gives L(r−1)=r2tL(r-1)=r^2t for a positive integer tt. Hence r2∣Lr^2\mid L. The orbit cliques have disjoint star-edge sets, so L(r−1)≤r2L(r-1)\le r^2, a contradiction.

Suppose a full color-ii clique meets SiS_i. It meets it exactly once, by the outsider cap at ∞\infty. Every clique in its HiH_i-orbit does likewise. Transitivity on SiS_i gives orbit size L=rtL=rt with t≥1t\ge1. Since L(r2)≤E0L\binom r2\le E_0, one has L<2rL<2r and therefore L=rL=r.

Let DD be the number of old vertices outside the union of these rr cliques. It is also their total overlap, since their total vertex incidence is r2r^2. Tur'an on the uncovered vertices gives

r(r2)+D2/r−D2≤E0.r\binom r2+\frac{D^2/r-D}{2}\le E_0.

Thus x=D/rx=D/r satisfies x(x−1)≤r+1x(x-1)\le r+1, and x≤r+1x\le\sqrt r+1. Orbit transitivity makes the shared-vertex count hh the same in each clique. If dvd_v counts orbit cliques through a vertex, then

rh=∑dv≥2dv≤2D,h≤2x.rh=\sum_{d_v\ge2}d_v\le2D, \qquad h\le2x.

Remove the shared vertices and the unique vertex in SiS_i from each clique. The rr remaining disjoint parts have order at least

w=r−2x−1≥r−2r−3≥0.77r.w=r-2x-1\ge r-2\sqrt r-3\ge0.77r.

Their cross edges lie outside all orbit-clique edge sets, so number at most r(r+1)/2≤0.505r2<w2r(r+1)/2\le0.505r^2<w^2. Uniform independent representatives have expected conflict count below one. Some transversal is independent and avoids SiS_i; adjoining ∞\infty is a contradiction.

Consequently all color-ii full cliques lie in

Ui=V∖(Si∪{∞}),∣Ui∣=r(r−1),α(Gi[Ui])≤r−1.(1)U_i=V\setminus(S_i\cup\{\infty\}), \qquad |U_i|=r(r-1),\quad \alpha(G_i[U_i])\le r-1. \tag{1}

Divisible overlap forces disjointness

Let F>0F>0 be the common number of full cliques per color and let uu be the common order of their union. Old-vertex transitivity makes the number cc of these color unions through an old vertex constant. Counting gives ru=r2cru=r^2c, hence u=rcu=rc. Thus the total same-color overlap

M=rF−uM=rF-u

is a nonnegative multiple of rr.

If F≥r−2F\ge r-2, choose r−2r-2 full cliques in UiU_i with overlap M′M'. The overlap extension lemma makes their remainder have independence at most one: an independent pair would extend to rr vertices in UiU_i. That remainder has order r+M′r+M'. The clique cap forces M′=0M'=0 and makes the remainder a KrK_r. Thus UiU_i partitions into r−1r-1 full cliques. Any other full clique, if different from all these blocks, meets each block in at most one vertex and cannot have order rr. These are therefore all the full cliques, and they are disjoint.

If F≤r−3F\le r-3, remove all full cliques from UiU_i and put s=r−1−F≥2s=r-1-F\ge2. The remainder RR satisfies

∣R∣=rs+M,α(R)≤s,ω(R)≤r−1.|R|=rs+M,\qquad \alpha(R)\le s,\qquad \omega(R)\le r-1.

The first independence bound again uses extension at total size rr, not r+1r+1. The localized inequality gives

2e(R)≥r2s+3rM+2M2/s.2e(R)\ge r^2s+3rM+2M^2/s.

The rr star edges and the edge-disjoint clique-internal edges give

2e(R)≤r(r2+1)−2r−Fr(r−1).2e(R)\le r(r^2+1)-2r-Fr(r-1).

Upper minus lower is

r(r−1+F−3M)−2M2/s,r(r-1+F-3M)-2M^2/s,

negative if M≥rM\ge r. Divisibility forces M=0M=0. Thus every color's full cliques are disjoint, and (1) gives F≤r−1F\le r-1.

Safe isolation and the final incidence equation

In each color sequentially delete all edges leaving its full cliques, leaving those pairs uncolored. The safe-clique lemma preserves independence at most rr; the budget only decreases, and same-color disjointness preserves every other full clique. The outsider cap and hereditary caps persist. Every original full clique becomes a component.

A foreign full clique is an independent rr-set in the target color. It must meet every target full component, since omitting a component would allow one more independent vertex. The intersections have order exactly one.

The original invariant family has rFrF cliques of order rr on r2r^2 old vertices. Old-vertex transitivity gives exactly FF full cliques through each old vertex, now known to have distinct colors. Counting intersecting pairs of differently colored full cliques gives

(r2)F2=r2(F2).\binom r2 F^2=r^2\binom F2.

As F>0F>0, this forces F=rF=r, contradicting F≤r−1F\le r-1.

The full proof, including the removal of the regular-action assumption, was checked by the author and is author-recorded. It excludes the nonabelian one-point template in Construction attempts for every r≥100r\ge100. It does not exclude asymmetric colorings or prove any new unrestricted positive case of E617.