Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

The Ramsey Turnaround Numbers

Library card.


Nóra Almási, "The Ramsey Turnaround Numbers," master's thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 2023.

The library card is Library card; page locators below are the thesis's printed page numbers.

Scope and reading status

Claims checked. This digest covers Chapter 8, especially §8.2, "Lower bound via balanced colorings" (pp. 40--42), Definition 8.5 and Example 8.6 (pp. 40--41), Lemma 8.7 (p. 41), and Theorems 8.8, 8.10, and 8.12 (pp. 41--42). The statements and displayed parameter conditions were checked against the printed pages; the proofs were read for their common construction, but were not independently verified. Chapter 10, §10.1 (p. 51) supplies the thesis's classification of these strategies as offline Builder strategies.

Lemma 8.7 is not original to the thesis: it is explicitly presented as Erdős--Gyárfás, Theorem 5 in reference [20]. The thesis is therefore a useful secondary exposition and application, not the authoritative source for that balanced-coloring result.

Balanced-coloring template

Definition 8.5 (p. 40) calls an rr-edge-coloring of KNK_N a balanced (r,s)(r,s)-coloring when every set of ⌈N/r⌉\lceil N/r\rceil vertices contains a monochromatic KsK_s in each one of the rr colors. For s=2s=2, this says that every such vertex set induces at least one edge of every color.

Lemma 8.7 (p. 41) reads: "If a finite projective plane of order r+1r+1 exists, then Kr2+r+1K_{r^2+r+1} has a balanced (r,2)(r,2)-coloring." In the equivalent form used later, every r+2r+2 vertices induce an edge of each color. The thesis does not reproduce the incidence construction proving the lemma; it records the projective-plane input, notes immediately after the lemma that projective planes exist at prime-power orders, and uses the resulting coloring as a template.

Theorem 8.8 (p. 41) gives that use explicitly. Starting with the tt-color template on Kt2+t+1K_{t^2+t+1}, Builder blows every template vertex up to a part of Tt2+t+1(n)T_{t^2+t+1}(n) and assigns every cross-edge the color of its corresponding template edge. Builder exposes all cross-edges and forbids the assigned color. Any exposed Kt+2K_{t+2} must use distinct parts, while the balanced property says that its corresponding t+2t+2 template vertices contain an edge assigned each color. Consequently it cannot be monochromatic in any Painter color. Grouping actual colors into sets of size at most ff extends the same forbidden-label strategy from tt colors to f<q≤tff<q\le tf, yielding

∥Tt2+t+1(n)∥<Rf(Kt+2,n,q)\lVert T_{t^2+t+1}(n)\rVert < \mathfrak{R}_f(K_{t+2},n,q)

when n≥r(Kt+2,q)n\ge r(K_{t+2},q) and the required projective plane exists.

This is a use in an online Ramsey-type game, but the strategy itself is static: the exposed graph and forbidden labels are fixed in advance. Chapter 10, §10.1 (p. 51) expressly describes the strategies of its Sections 7, 8 and 9 as offline Builder strategies. No adaptive response to Painter is used in Theorem 8.8.

Removing the prime-power restriction

Theorem 8.10 (p. 42), using the Bertrand--Chebyshev prime lemma 8.9, chooses a nearby prime order and restricts the resulting balanced coloring to obtain, for n≥r(Kt+1,q)n\ge r(K_{t+1},q), the displayed universal bound

∥T(t/2)2+t/2+1(n)∥<Rf(Kt+1,n,q),f<q≤tf2.\left\lVert T_{(t/2)^2+t/2+1}(n) \right\rVert < \mathfrak{R}_f(K_{t+1},n,q), \qquad f<q\le \frac{tf}{2}.

Theorem 8.12 (p. 42) makes the same move with the short-prime-interval result in Lemma 8.11. For sufficiently large tt, it chooses t′t' with t′+1t'+1 prime and t−t0.525−1≤t′<tt-t^{0.525}-1\le t'<t, applies Theorem 8.8 at t′t', and weakens the forbidden target from Kt′+2K_{t'+2} to Kt+2K_{t+2}. Its displayed conclusion is

∥T(t−t0.525−1)2+(t−t0.525−1)+1(n)∥<Rf(Kt+2,n,q)\left\lVert T_{(t-t^{0.525}-1)^2+(t-t^{0.525}-1)+1}(n) \right\rVert < \mathfrak{R}_f(K_{t+2},n,q)

for f<q≤(t−t0.525−1)ff<q\le (t-t^{0.525}-1)f, n≥r(Kt+2,q)n\ge r(K_{t+2},q) and t>x0t>x_0, with x0x_0 from Lemma 8.11.

The thesis leaves integer rounding implicit in both Turán part counts when t/2t/2 or t−t0.525−1t-t^{0.525}-1 is not integral. In the proof of Theorem 8.10 it also invokes pt−1≥t/2p_t-1\ge t/2 after Lemma 8.9 has only been stated as providing pt∈[t/2,t]p_t\in[t/2,t]. These displayed forms therefore need an explicit rounding choice and the strict form of the prime-interval input before being reused as literal all-integer statements.

Relation to Problem 617

Problem 617 asks whether every rr-coloring of Kr2+1K_{r^2+1} has an (r+1)(r+1)-vertex set whose induced edges miss a color. Lemma 8.7 has the same balanced-coloring vocabulary but different parameters: conditionally on a projective plane, it gives an rr-coloring of Kr2+r+1K_{r^2+r+1} in which every (r+2)(r+2)-vertex set sees every color. Both the host order and the tested subset size differ from E0617. Theorem 8.8 and its prime-interval variants then consume that analogue to bound a Ramsey turnaround number, rather than resolve the ordinary coloring question in E0617.