Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Colored modules


Proved necessary conditions, not a resolution. Let an rr-coloring of Kr2+1K_{r^2+1}, r≥3r\ge3, have color graphs GiG_i with α(Gi)≤r\alpha(G_i)\le r. A colored module is a vertex set SS such that, for every x∉Sx\notin S, all edges from xx to SS have the same color; that color may depend on xx.

There is no colored module with 2≤∣S∣≤r22\le |S|\le r^2. In particular, no ordinary nontrivial substitution or blowup of an edge-colored complete graph can be a counterexample. This does not exclude constructions that color edges between fibers nonuniformly.

A coupled inequality for common nonneighbors

Let OO be a vertex set of order mm, and for each color choose Wi⊆OW_i\subseteq O with α(Gi[Wi])≤bi\alpha(G_i[W_i])\le b_i. Omit terms for which bi=0b_i=0; those sets must be empty. Put

L=∑i∣Wi∣,B=∑ibi.L=\sum_i|W_i|,\qquad B=\sum_i b_i.

When L>0L>0, also B>0B>0, and

2L2B−(r+1)L≤m(m−1).(1)\boxed{\frac{2L^2}{B}-(r+1)L\le m(m-1).} \tag{1}

Indeed, the localized independence inequality and ω(Gi)≤r\omega(G_i)\le r give

2e(Gi[Wi])≥2∣Wi∣2bi−(r+1)∣Wi∣.2e(G_i[W_i])\ge\frac{2|W_i|^2}{b_i}-(r+1)|W_i|.

Sum, use Cauchy--Schwarz, and note that the counted edges of different colors are disjoint subsets of (O2)\binom O2. The input inequality is Theorem 2.2 of Abiad--Kumar--Pragada, evaluated at the uniform vector. Its relevant statement and proof were checked, as the linked note records.

Quantitative separation of two color neighborhoods

For distinct u,vu,v, define

k(u,v)=∣{x∉{u,v}:c(ux)≠c(vx)}∣.k(u,v)=|\{x\notin\{u,v\}:c(ux)\ne c(vx)\}|.

Then

2k(u,v)2(r−1)2−3(r+1)k(u,v)+r2−1≤0,(2)\boxed{\frac{2k(u,v)^2}{(r-1)^2} -3(r+1)k(u,v)+r^2-1\le0,} \tag{2}

and therefore

k(u,v)≥⌈r/3⌉.(3)\boxed{k(u,v)\ge\lceil r/3\rceil.} \tag{3}

To prove this, take O=V∖{u,v}O=V\setminus\{u,v\} and let WiW_i consist of vertices sending neither incident edge to u,vu,v in color ii. If c(uv)=jc(uv)=j, the independence capacities are bj=r−1b_j=r-1 and bi=r−2b_i=r-2 for i≠ji\ne j: append one or both of u,vu,v to an independent set in WiW_i, as appropriate. Thus

m=r2−1,B=(r−1)2,L=(r−1)m−k(u,v).m=r^2-1,\quad B=(r-1)^2,\quad L=(r-1)m-k(u,v).

An agreeing outside vertex belongs to r−1r-1 sets WiW_i and a disagreeing one belongs to r−2r-2. Substituting in (1) gives (2). For 0≤k≤(r−1)/30\le k\le(r-1)/3, the constant minus the linear term in (2) is nonnegative and its quadratic term is positive unless k=0k=0, when the constant is positive. This proves (3).

This argument does not require the full-palette conclusion. In particular, it directly excludes two-vertex colored modules.

Excluding every proper nontrivial module

Suppose SS is a colored module. Write

t=∣S∣,m=r2+1−t,ai=α(Gi[S]),bi=r−ai.t=|S|,\quad m=r^2+1-t,\quad a_i=\alpha(G_i[S]),\quad b_i=r-a_i.

Let WiW_i consist of vertices outside SS whose common color to SS is not ii. Independent sets in SS and WiW_i combine in color ii, so bib_i is a valid capacity. Here L=(r−1)mL=(r-1)m, and (1) implies

B≥2(r−1)2mm+r2−2.(4)B\ge\frac{2(r-1)^2m}{m+r^2-2}. \tag{4}

Complementary Turan on SS gives

2e(Gi[S])≥t2/ai−t.2e(G_i[S])\ge t^2/a_i-t.

Summing over colors and applying Cauchy--Schwarz gives

∑i1ai≤t+r−1t,∑iai≥r2tt+r−1,B≤r2(r−1)t+r−1.(5)\sum_i\frac1{a_i}\le\frac{t+r-1}{t},\qquad \sum_i a_i\ge\frac{r^2t}{t+r-1},\qquad B\le\frac{r^2(r-1)}{t+r-1}. \tag{5}

For t=2t=2 the preceding separation theorem is enough. Suppose t≥3t\ge3. Every vertex sees every color, by the established critical-component reduction. An outside vertex sees only one color on SS and at most m−1m-1 colors on the other outside vertices, so m≥rm\ge r. Also m≤r2−2m\le r^2-2.

Combining (4)--(5) requires F(m)≤0F(m)\le0, where

F(m)=2(r−1)m(r2+r−m)−r2(m+r2−2).F(m)=2(r-1)m(r^2+r-m)-r^2(m+r^2-2).

This polynomial is concave, but its two endpoint values are

F(r)=r2(r−1)(r−2)>0,F(r2−2)=2(r−2)(r2−2)>0.F(r)=r^2(r-1)(r-2)>0,\qquad F(r^2-2)=2(r-2)(r^2-2)>0.

It is therefore positive throughout the required interval, a contradiction. The known cases 3≤r≤113\le r\le11 may simply be treated as inputs; the full-palette reduction supplies the nonvacuous conditional argument for the remaining range.

A shorter structural proof for the remaining range

For r≥4r\ge4, two disjoint full cliques of one color already exclude all nontrivial proper modules. Such cliques are supplied by the least-color packing reduction.

First, a module SS with at least two vertices cannot be disjoint from a full color-ii clique QQ. Partition QQ into sets QjQ_j according to their common color to SS. For j≠ij\ne i, the independent-set bound gives ∣Qj∣≥α(Gj[S])|Q_j|\ge\alpha(G_j[S]). Any two vertices of SS consequently give

r≥∑j≠i∣Qj∣≥∑j≠iα(Gj[S])≥2r−3>r.r\ge\sum_{j\ne i}|Q_j| \ge\sum_{j\ne i}\alpha(G_j[S])\ge2r-3>r.

Thus SS meets two disjoint full color-ii cliques Q,RQ,R. If q∈Q∖Sq\in Q\setminus S, the module condition makes qq complete to SS in color ii. The full-clique outsider cap then gives ∣R∩S∣=1|R\cap S|=1. Every vertex of R∖SR\setminus S is likewise complete to SS in color ii. A vertex of Q∩SQ\cap S now has r−1≥2r-1\ge2 color-ii neighbors in RR, again contradicting that cap. Hence Q⊆SQ\subseteq S. For an outside vertex xx, the (r+1)(r+1)-set Q∪{x}Q\cup\{x\} uses at most two colors, the final contradiction.

The general inequality, endpoint arithmetic, and structural proof were checked by the author and are author-recorded. None forces a module to exist in an arbitrary coloring, so none proves the quantified assertion.