Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Geometric boundary


Write G=Z^G=\widehat{\mathbb Z}, Cq=[aq]qC_q=[a_q]_q, U=⋃qCqU=\bigcup_q C_q, and K=G∖UK=G\setminus U. The Haar measures are β=μ(U)\beta=\mu(U) and δ=μ(K)\delta=\mu(K). The actual excluded set is

B={n≥1:∃q≤n, n≡aq(modq)}.B=\{n\ge1:\exists q\le n,\ n\equiv a_q\pmod q\}.

The boundary model below does not alone settle the problem. It does give a sufficient condition for natural density, uniform under common profinite affine transformations of the residues.

Location of a possible logarithmic defect

The ambient measures

λX=1H⌊X⌋∑n≤X1nδ(log⁡n/log⁡X, n)\lambda_X=\frac1{H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}} \sum_{n\le X}\frac1n \delta_{(\log n/\log X,\,n)}

on [0,1]×G[0,1]\times G converge weakly to dt dμdt\,d\mu. For a fixed residue class modulo LL and 0≤s<t≤10\le s<t\le1, harmonic summation between XsX^s and XtX^t gives the required mass (t−s)/L+o(1)(t-s)/L+o(1). Finite unions of such product sets, or approximation of continuous functions by them, prove the assertion.

Replace the sum by its restriction to n∈Bn\in B, obtaining λXB\lambda_X^B. Every subsequential weak limit λB\lambda^B has the form

dλB=1U(z) dt dμ(z)+ρ(t,z)1∂U(z) dt dμ(z),0≤ρ≤1.(1)d\lambda^B =\mathbf1_U(z)\,dt\,d\mu(z) +\rho(t,z)\mathbf1_{\partial U}(z)\,dt\,d\mu(z), \qquad0\le\rho\le1. \tag{1}

Indeed 0≤λXB≤λX0\le\lambda_X^B\le\lambda_X implies domination of the limit by dt dμdt\,d\mu. Every compact subset of UU is covered by a fixed finite set of cylinders. Away from t=0t=0, these are all active for large XX, so the limit agrees with the ambient measure on [0,1]×U[0,1]\times U. No deleted integer lies in G∖U‾G\setminus\overline U; open-set approximation makes the limit zero there. The slice t=0t=0 has zero ambient measure. These observations prove (1).

In particular, a positive discrepancy from β\beta requires μ(∂U)>0\mu(\partial U)>0. If μ(∂U)=0\mu(\partial U)=0, the analogous ordinary counting argument already gives natural density. Formula (1) locates the possible defect; it does not prove that ρ=0\rho=0.

A local reciprocal criterion

Define the closed set

D={x∈G: for every L≥1,∑q:aq≡x(mod(q,L))1q=∞}.(2)D=\left\{x\in G:\ \text{for every }L\ge1, \sum_{\substack{q\,: a_q\equiv x\pmod{(q,L)}}}\frac1q=\infty\right\}. \tag{2}

The compatibility condition in the sum is exactly Cq∩[x]L≠∅C_q\cap[x]_L\ne\varnothing. The complement of DD is open: a clopen fiber witnessing convergence does so for all its points. On any such fiber, only a reciprocal-summable collection of classes can contribute. The ordinary activated union bound therefore gives finite-periodic approximation on that fiber. In (1), the defect is consequently supported on [0,1]×(K∩D)[0,1]\times(K\cap D) as well.

Theorem. If μ(K∩D)=0\mu(K\cap D)=0, the delayed survivor set has natural density δ\delta. Convergence is uniform when all residues are changed simultaneously by

aq⟼uaq+z(modq),u∈Z^×,z∈Z^.(3)a_q\longmapsto ua_q+z\pmod q, \qquad u\in\widehat{\mathbb Z}^{\times},\quad z\in\widehat{\mathbb Z}. \tag{3}

Proof. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose a clopen O⊃K∩DO\supset K\cap D with μ(O)<ε\mu(O)<\varepsilon. The compact set K∖OK\setminus O has a finite cover by clopen fibers whose intersecting cylinder families have convergent reciprocal sums. Their union VV satisfies

∑q:Cq∩V≠∅1q<∞.\sum_{q:C_q\cap V\ne\varnothing}\frac1q<\infty.

The compact set W=G∖(O∪V)W=G\setminus(O\cup V) is contained in UU, so a finite prefix, with moduli at most Q0Q_0, covers WW. Choose Q≥Q0Q\ge Q_0 such that

∑q>Q:Cq∩V≠∅1q<ε,β−μ(U≤Q)<ε.\sum_{\substack{q>Q\,: C_q\cap V\ne\varnothing}}\frac1q <\varepsilon,\qquad \beta-\mu(U_{\le Q})<\varepsilon.

Every actual deletion outside the prefix has a witnessing modulus q>Qq>Q. It cannot lie in WW, since n≥q>Q0n\ge q>Q_0 makes the old covering class there active. If PP is a period of OO, then

∣(B∖B≤Q)∩[1,N]∣≤μ(O)N+P+N∑q>Q:Cq∩V≠∅1q≤2εN+P.(4)|(B\setminus B_{\le Q})\cap[1,N]| \le \mu(O)N+P+ N\sum_{\substack{q>Q\,: C_q\cap V\ne\varnothing}}\frac1q \le2\varepsilon N+P. \tag{4}

The bound N/qN/q per class is exact for delayed classes; there is no accumulated inactive-root error. Finite-prefix counting and (4) prove natural density β\beta for BB.

Under (3), transport O,V,WO,V,W by x↦ux+zx\mapsto ux+z. Their measures, periods, cylinder intersections, and reciprocal sums are unchanged. The finite-prefix counting error is uniform over these transformations, as is (4). Thus the conclusion is uniform in (u,z)(u,z). □\square

A noncoherent example with unbounded prime rank

Let RjR_j be the product of the first jj odd primes and set Mj=22jRjM_j=2^{2j}R_j. Choose cj(modMj)c_j\pmod{M_j} with

cj≡22j−1(mod22j),cj≡0(modRj).c_j\equiv2^{2j-1}\pmod{2^{2j}},\qquad c_j\equiv0\pmod{R_j}.

The cylinders Wj=[cj]MjW_j=[c_j]_{M_j} are pairwise disjoint. For every jj and every prime p∤Mjp\nmid M_j, use modulus MjpM_jp, with residue cjc_j modulo MjM_j and any chosen residue modulo pp. All moduli are distinct: their 22-adic valuations distinguish different jj, and within a fixed jj the prime pp distinguishes them. They can therefore be enumerated strictly increasingly.

For a fixed jj, independent prime coordinates and ∑p∤Mj1/p=∞\sum_{p\nmid M_j}1/p=\infty show that these classes cover WjW_j almost everywhere. Hence

β=∑j≥11Mj<13.\beta=\sum_{j\ge1}\frac1{M_j}<\frac13.

Moreover

D⊆⋃jWj ∪ {x:x2=0}.D\subseteq\bigcup_j W_j\ \cup\ \{x:x_2=0\}.

To see this, a point of finite 22-adic valuation can have a neighborhood meeting only its matching WjW_j, if there is one. If it is outside that WjW_j, refine the neighborhood to avoid it too. The last displayed 22-adic zero set is Haar-null, and K∩WjK\cap W_j is null for each jj. Thus the theorem gives natural density 1−∑j1/Mj1-\sum_j1/M_j, uniformly under (3). The reciprocal sum diverges, the survivor density is positive, and both modulus prime rank and pairwise-gcd prime rank are unbounded. The residues need not be coherent.

The geometric argument permits multi-residue families as well, with reciprocal sums counting congruence pairs with multiplicity. The next example shows that its local reciprocal hypothesis is not automatic, even for primitive zero-residue singleton families whose natural density exists.

Positive natural density with D=GD=G: proved obstruction

For every 0<ε<10<\varepsilon<1, there is a primitive family of distinct zero-residue moduli such that

μ(K)>1−ε,D=G,∂U=K,(5)\mu(K)>1-\varepsilon,\qquad D=G,\qquad\partial U=K, \tag{5}

and the original delayed survivor set nevertheless has natural density μ(K)\mu(K). Thus positive survivor measure, primitivity, and even actual natural-density existence do not force local reciprocal summability on any positive-measure part of the survivor set.

Construction and Haar measure

Choose sufficiently large integers kj→∞k_j\to\infty such that

∑j1kj<∞,∑jexp⁡(−(2log⁡2−1)kj+kj−3)<ε.(6)\sum_j\frac1{k_j}<\infty, \qquad \sum_j\exp\bigl(-(2\log2-1)k_j+k_j^{-3}\bigr)<\varepsilon. \tag{6}

For example, a sufficiently large multiple of 2j2^j works. Choose pairwise disjoint finite prime blocks PjP_j, all primes in PjP_j larger than kj3k_j^3, with

kj≤λj:=∑p∈Pj1p<kj+kj−3.(7)k_j\le\lambda_j:=\sum_{p\in P_j}\frac1p <k_j+k_j^{-3}. \tag{7}

They can be chosen successively, beyond all primes already used, by stopping when the prime reciprocal sum first reaches kjk_j.

Let Qj\mathcal Q_j consist of all products of 2kj2k_j distinct primes from PjP_j, and install the zero class at every q∈⋃jQjq\in\bigcup_j\mathcal Q_j. All moduli are distinct and primitive: within a block they are squarefree of the same rank, and different blocks use disjoint prime sets. They therefore admit the required strictly increasing enumeration.

Let Uj=⋃q∈QjqGU_j=\bigcup_{q\in\mathcal Q_j}qG and βj=μ(Uj)\beta_j=\mu(U_j). For Haar-random zz, let Yj(z)Y_j(z) count the primes of PjP_j dividing zz. Then Uj={Yj≥2kj}U_j=\{Y_j\ge2k_j\}, and independent prime coordinates give

βj≤2−2kjE2Yj=2−2kj∏p∈Pj(1+1/p)≤exp⁡(−(2log⁡2−1)kj+kj−3).(8)\beta_j \le 2^{-2k_j}\mathbb E2^{Y_j} =2^{-2k_j}\prod_{p\in P_j}(1+1/p) \le\exp\bigl(-(2\log2-1)k_j+k_j^{-3}\bigr). \tag{8}

Consequently μ(U)≤∑jβj<ε\mu(U)\le\sum_j\beta_j<\varepsilon.

Reciprocal divergence in every neighborhood

The reciprocal sum of one block is

∑q∈Qj1q=e2kj((1/p)p∈Pj)=(1+O(kj−2))λj2kj(2kj)!.(9)\sum_{q\in\mathcal Q_j}\frac1q =e_{2k_j}\bigl((1/p)_{p\in P_j}\bigr) =\bigl(1+O(k_j^{-2})\bigr) \frac{\lambda_j^{2k_j}}{(2k_j)!}. \tag{9}

To check the approximation, draw 2kj2k_j primes independently with probabilities (1/p)/λj(1/p)/\lambda_j. The probability of no collision is (2kj)!e2kj/λj2kj(2k_j)!e_{2k_j}/\lambda_j^{2k_j}. Each draw has maximal point mass at most kj−4k_j^{-4}, so the union bound over pairs gives collision probability O(kj−2)O(k_j^{-2}). Stirling's formula shows that the right side of (9) tends to infinity. Increase the initial choice of the kjk_j if necessary so that every block reciprocal sum is at least one.

Fix a modulus LL. All sufficiently late blocks consist entirely of primes coprime to LL. For every qq in these blocks, the cylinder qGqG meets every residue fiber modulo LL, by CRT. Summing (9) over these blocks proves divergence in every fiber. This is exactly D=GD=G. The same observation shows that UU is dense in GG. Since UU is open, ∂U=G∖U=K\partial U=G\setminus U=K, establishing (5).

Uniform counting bound for one block

Fix one block, abbreviating k=kjk=k_j, P=PjP=P_j, and λ=λj\lambda=\lambda_j. For an integer X≥1X\ge1, let

ZX(n)=∑p∈Pp≤X1p∣n,λX=∑p∈Pp≤X1p,Z_X(n)=\sum_{\substack{p\in P\\p\le\sqrt X}}\mathbf1_{p\mid n}, \qquad \lambda_X=\sum_{\substack{p\in P\\p\le\sqrt X}}\frac1p,

and let ss be the number of primes in this sum. Average over 1≤n≤X1\le n\le X. Exact floor counts imply

λX−s/X≤EZX≤λX,EZX2≤λX+λX2.\lambda_X-s/X\le\mathbb E Z_X\le\lambda_X, \qquad \mathbb E Z_X^2\le\lambda_X+\lambda_X^2.

Therefore

E(ZX−λX)2≤λX+2λXs/X≤λ+1,(10)\mathbb E(Z_X-\lambda_X)^2 \le\lambda_X+2\lambda_Xs/X \le\lambda+1, \tag{10}

using λX≤s/2\lambda_X\le s/2 and s≤Xs\le\sqrt X.

If a positive integer n≤Xn\le X is deleted by a modulus in this block, that modulus divides nn and hence is at most XX. At most one of its 2k2k prime factors can exceed X\sqrt X. Thus ZX(n)≥2k−1Z_X(n)\ge2k-1. By (7), for sufficiently large kk, 2k−1−λX≥k/22k-1-\lambda_X\ge k/2. Chebyshev's inequality and (10) give the uniform bound

1X#{n≤X:∃q∈Qj, q∣n}≤Ckj,(11)\frac1X\#\{n\le X:\exists q\in\mathcal Q_j,\ q\mid n\} \le\frac{C}{k_j}, \tag{11}

with an absolute constant CC.

Natural-density conclusion and activation

For zero residues, a positive full hit q∣nq\mid n automatically has n≥qn\ge q, so original activation introduces no exception at all. By (11), the union of blocks after JJ has at most

CX∑j>J1kjCX\sum_{j>J}\frac1{k_j}

hits below XX, uniformly in XX. For each XX only finitely many distinct moduli can be active, so this countable union bound follows directly from the finite one. Its normalized upper bound tends to zero as J→∞J\to\infty by (6).

Every finite union of blocks is periodic, and its Haar measure tends to μ(U)\mu(U) as the blocks exhaust the family. The last tail estimate therefore proves natural density μ(U)\mu(U) for the excluded set and μ(K)>1−ε\mu(K)>1-\varepsilon for its complement. This construction is an obstruction to making the local reciprocal criterion automatic, not a counterexample to the target density statement.