Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Conditioned endpoint blocks
This is a finite obstruction, not a counterexample to Problem 25. It defeats a proposed scale-by-scale charging inequality. An amortized argument would have to account for the earlier sieve which prepares each block, not only the new endpoints and their incremental Haar measure.
Statement
For each fixed integer , put . For arbitrarily large multiples of , there is a finite distinct-modulus singleton sieve using only moduli below , with at least first-kill endpoints . The sum of the full first-kill densities of these new endpoint classes satisfies
Consequently there are no absolute and positive function for which every such block satisfies
Choose with and fix .
The earlier congruences need not themselves have private endpoints. Thus this does not disprove a version of (2) imposing that additional condition on the entire earlier family.
Preparing a protected set with uniformly distributed empty residues
Fix and set
We take sufficiently large in terms of , so . Install the classes
Their full survivor set is exactly . For each future modulus , write
Every effective modulus satisfies , and a given arises from at most original moduli. Indeed with .
Select by retaining each integer independently with probability . For each distinct effective modulus , let
The indicators of are independent as varies with fixed, since their sets of sampled integers are disjoint. If , their means are . We have
so all these means are at least for large .
Put and . With probability tending to one, simultaneously for all the effective , all with , and all ,
Here and below the absolute constants in this -notation can be fixed independently of .
To verify the expectation in (3), the row lengths have only two consecutive values. The longer rows form a cyclic interval of residues modulo . Its intersection counts in classes modulo differ by at most one. Thus if , then
For a sum of independent Bernoulli variables, the exponential-moment bound gives $\Pr(|Y-\mathbb EY|>\epsilon\mathbb EY) \le2\exp(-\epsilon^2\mathbb EY/3)$ for . Apply this to all these counts and to . There are at most counts, while each error probability is exponentially small in a positive power of . The expectation error of at most one is also negligible relative to . This proves (3) by a union bound. The same inequality gives with probability tending to one. Fix an with all these properties.
Making the full survivor measure small
Independently for each original modulus , choose a uniform and install
For , condition (4) is equivalent to , because . Every point of avoids all these classes and the earlier digit classes.
Let be Haar-random and write
We claim
If , CRT and (3) give
The total contribution of these covariances is . The number of ordered original pairs with is at most
For such a pair, (3) bounds the joint expectation by
For an upper variance bound its covariance is no larger than this. Therefore
which implies (5), since .
The mean is more precisely
This follows by expanding and using harmonic sums in the resulting divisibility classes.
Conditional on , independent choices in (4) leave it uncovered with probability . Consequently the expected full periodic survivor density of the old sieve (the digit classes and (4)) is at most
By (5)--(6), some finite choice of the residues therefore has full survivor density
It still preserves every point of .
Appending the endpoint block and checking activation
Choose exactly points from , and for each chosen append the zero class modulo . Every appended modulus exceeds every old modulus, and they are all distinct. The endpoint avoids every old full class by construction. It also avoids every other appended class of smaller modulus: two distinct integers in cannot divide one another. Thus it is first killed by its own congruence, active exactly at .
There are exactly such endpoints. The full first-kill cells of the appended classes are disjoint subsets of the old full survivor set. Their total Haar mass is consequently at most , proving (1).
One can also keep the global survivor density at least : replace every pair in this finite construction by . This confines all deletions to the even integers, preserves activation exactly, and halves both the endpoint block fraction and the selected Haar mass. Thus a positive global survivor density does not repair (2).
The construction does not arrange infinitely many such preparations at bounded total Haar cost while preserving positive logarithmic endpoint mass. Nor do its individual endpoint windows have positive normalized logarithmic weight as . These are the missing requirements for a counterexample to the original problem.
Why independent protection does not extend to a logarithmic epoch
The last continuation tested replacing the dyadic protected window by an interval , with fixed . For independent positive-density protection, there is a precise obstruction.
Let be an integer, , and . Retain each integer of independently with probability , obtaining . If , then
Indeed, each residue class modulo contains at least points of . The probability all are omitted is at most the indicated power of . There are possible classes, so the union bound proves (8).
For , the right side tends to zero. With probability tending to one, every class at every preparatory modulus therefore meets . All those congruences would be active at the intersecting points, because the protected interval starts at . Consequently no such class can be installed while preserving all of . This prevents the direct Bernoulli empty-residue construction from protecting a fixed positive density across a polynomial epoch.
The same obstruction applies inside the fixed fiber used above. Select quotient integers independently on . Every class modulo compatible with induces one quotient class modulo . Repeating the proof bounds the probability of any compatible empty class by
For fixed and , this also tends to zero. Incompatible classes can be installed but remove no part of the fiber and so cannot supply the intended preparation within it.
Equations (8)--(9) concern independent sampling at a fixed positive retention probability. They do not rule out a correlated protected set, a growing preparatory fiber, or interleaved preparation using moduli larger than . The overlapping-parent preparation still lacks distinct appended congruences with sufficiently long protected active traces. Its pointwise conditional Haar estimates do not establish the required trace statement.