Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Branch separated centers


Theorem: proved

Partition a family of globally distinct moduli into blocks DbD_b, indexed by distinct integers b∈Zb\in\mathbb Z, using the residue b(modq)b\pmod q throughout DbD_b, and suppose

∣b∣<min⁡Db.(1)|b|<\min D_b. \tag{1}

Assume there is a fixed integer R≥1R\ge1 such that, for every prime pp and every residue u(modp)u\pmod p, at most RR centers bb satisfy both

b≡u(modp),p∣q for some q∈Db.(2)b\equiv u\pmod p, \qquad p\mid q\text{ for some }q\in D_b. \tag{2}

Then the delayed union, with the original activation n≥qn\ge q, has logarithmic density equal to its full Haar union measure. It has finite-periodic approximation in upper logarithmic density.

Write HB(X)=∑n≤X, n∈B1/nH_B(X)=\sum_{n\le X,\ n\in B}1/n, and let HNH_N be the ordinary harmonic sum. For a finite such system of Haar union measure β<1\beta<1, and every X≥1X\ge1,

HB(X)H⌊X⌋≤min⁡{1,Rlog⁡(1/(1−β))}.(3)\frac{H_B(X)}{H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}} \le\min\{1,R\log(1/(1-\beta))\}. \tag{3}

This is a different extension of the bounded-prime-overlap block theorem: arbitrarily many blocks may use a prime, provided their centers have bounded multiplicity in each first-digit branch.

Corollary. For every fixed C>0C>0, the delayed union for arbitrary normalized residues 0≤aq<q0\le a_q<q has logarithmic density if

min⁡(aq,q−aq)<CP−(q)(q>1).(4)\min(a_q,q-a_q)<C P^-(q)\qquad(q>1). \tag{4}

There is no coherence assumption. In particular the one-sided condition aq<CP−(q)a_q<C P^-(q) suffices. Modulus one is trivial and can be handled separately.

Choose the representative bq≡aq(modq)b_q\equiv a_q\pmod q of smallest absolute value, breaking a possible tie consistently. Then ∣bq∣<q|b_q|<q, and (4) gives ∣bq∣<Cp|b_q|<Cp whenever p∣qp\mid q. In the open interval (−Cp,Cp)(-Cp,Cp), a fixed residue modulo pp has at most ⌈2C⌉\lceil2C\rceil integer representatives. Thus (2) holds with that RR. For the one-sided condition use bq=aq≥0b_q=a_q\ge0 and R=⌈C⌉R=\lceil C\rceil.

A one-coordinate inequality

Let xpx_p have Haar law on Zp\mathbb Z_p. Suppose finitely many nonnegative functions fb(xp)f_b(x_p) have the following property: for each bb, there is a constant cb≥0c_b\ge0 such that

fb=cb outside [b]p,0≤fb≤cb everywhere.(5)f_b=c_b\text{ outside }[b]_p,\qquad 0\le f_b\le c_b\text{ everywhere}. \tag{5}

Suppose each branch modulo pp has at most RR assigned functions. Then

Ep∏bfb≤∏b(EpfbR)1/R.(6)\mathbb E_p\prod_b f_b \le\prod_b(\mathbb E_p f_b^R)^{1/R}. \tag{6}

To prove this, group the functions by their branch uu, and write hu=∏b≡u(p)fbh_u=\prod_{b\equiv u(p)}f_b, Cu=∏b≡u(p)cbC_u=\prod_{b\equiv u(p)}c_b. If a baseline is zero both sides are zero. Otherwise put tu=Ep(Cu−hu)/Cut_u=\mathbb E_p(C_u-h_u)/C_u. The depressions from the baselines have disjoint supports, so

Ep∏uhu=∏uCu(1−∑utu)≤∏uCu∏u(1−tu)=∏uEphu.\mathbb E_p\prod_u h_u =\prod_u C_u\left(1-\sum_u t_u\right) \le\prod_u C_u\prod_u(1-t_u) =\prod_u\mathbb E_p h_u.

Apply Hölder within each group of at most RR factors, padding with constant-one factors when needed, to get (6). This argument allows arbitrary variation within each branch; it does not assume that different centers in the same branch have nested deeper balls.

For a product of prime-coordinate spaces, (6) can be iterated. If a factor satisfies (5) at every coordinate on which it depends, replacing it by (EpfbR)1/R(\mathbb E_p f_b^R)^{1/R} preserves (5) at all other coordinates: their pointwise baseline upper bounds survive integration and taking positive roots. The RR-norm operations commute across independent coordinates. Thus

E∏bfb≤∏b(EfbR)1/R.(7)\mathbb E\prod_b f_b \le\prod_b(\mathbb E f_b^R)^{1/R}. \tag{7}

Factors independent of a coordinate can be taken outside its integral.

Apply the inequality to block survivors

For a finite subsystem put

Ub=⋃q∈Db[b]q,βb=μ(Ub),fb=1G∖Ub,U_b=\bigcup_{q\in D_b}[b]_q,\qquad \beta_b=\mu(U_b),\qquad f_b=\mathbf1_{G\setminus U_b},

where G=Z^G=\widehat{\mathbb Z}. With all other coordinates fixed, fbf_b is constant outside [b]p[b]_p, and cannot increase on that branch. Classes in DbD_b not divisible by pp may make it zero everywhere; this is the zero-baseline case already included. Condition (2) therefore permits (7), giving

1−β=μ(⋂bUbc)≤∏b(1−βb)1/R.(8)1-\beta=\mu\Bigl(\bigcap_b U_b^c\Bigr) \le\prod_b(1-\beta_b)^{1/R}. \tag{8}

For countable systems, exhaust finitely many classes in finitely many blocks and pass to the limit. If the full survivor measure δ=1−β\delta=1-\beta is positive, (8) implies

∑bβb≤∑b−log⁡(1−βb)≤Rlog⁡(1/δ)<∞.(9)\sum_b\beta_b \le\sum_b-\log(1-\beta_b) \le R\log(1/\delta)<\infty. \tag{9}

Exact harmonic control of a signed-center block

For every block satisfying (1), with delayed union BbB_b,

HBb(X)≤βbH⌊X⌋.(10)H_{B_b}(X)\le\beta_b H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}. \tag{10}

For b≥0b\ge0, the block is exactly b+M(Db)b+M(D_b): every generator exceeds bb, and its active points are b+tqb+tq, t≥1t\ge1. Subtracting bb does not increase the cutoff or decrease a harmonic weight, so (10) follows from the exact multiples inequality.

For b=−c<0b=-c<0, let PbP_b be the primitive core of DbD_b. Since c<min⁡Dbc<\min D_b, the exact identity is

Bb=(M(Db)∖Pb)−c.(11)B_b=(M(D_b)\setminus P_b)-c. \tag{11}

Indeed, a point m=n+cm=n+c divisible by a generator qq is active unless m=qm=q and there is no proper generator divisor of mm. These exceptional points are exactly PbP_b; any proper generator divisor is at most m/2m/2, and m−q≥q>cm-q\ge q>c makes its deletion active at n=m−cn=m-c.

Each point of M(Db)∩(X,X+c]M(D_b)\cap(X,X+c] has a primitive divisor in Pb∩[1,X+c]P_b\cap[1,X+c]. Different points cannot choose the same divisor: every primitive divisor is greater than cc, whereas the points differ by less than cc. Hence

∣Bb∩[1,X]∣=∣M(Db)∩[1,X+c]∣−∣Pb∩[1,X+c]∣≤∣M(Db)∩[1,X]∣.|B_b\cap[1,X]| =|M(D_b)\cap[1,X+c]|-|P_b\cap[1,X+c]| \le |M(D_b)\cap[1,X]|.

Partial summation and the exact multiples inequality again give (10). For integer cutoffs this argument is literal; real cutoffs follow by taking integer parts.

Each fixed signed-center block has finite-periodic logarithmic approximation. For nonnegative centers this is the multiples theorem and fixed translation. For negative centers, primitive sets are logarithmically null, so (11) gives the same conclusion. More explicitly, if F⊂DbF\subset D_b is finite, then

Bb(Db)∖Bb(F)⊆((M(Db)∖M(F))−c)∪(P(F)−c),B_b(D_b)\setminus B_b(F) \subseteq ((M(D_b)\setminus M(F))-c)\cup(P(F)-c),

whose second term is finite. Finite approximation for multiples therefore transfers to the delayed block.

Finish the density theorem

For δ>0\delta>0, (9)--(10) show that all blocks outside any finite selection have normalized harmonic mass at most the omitted sum of their βb\beta_b. This tends to zero as the selection grows. Approximate each of the finitely many retained blocks by finitely many of its congruences. Finite unions preserve upper logarithmic approximation, proving the theorem. Any such finite selection is contained in an original finite initial segment of increasing moduli.

If δ=0\delta=0, finite delayed prefixes already imply natural survivor density zero. For a finite family, summing (10) and using (9) proves (3). One can also write the constant-factor consequence

HB(X)≤β1−e−1/RH⌊X⌋.H_B(X)\le\frac{\beta}{1-e^{-1/R}}H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}.

This follows by splitting at β=1−e−1/R\beta=1-e^{-1/R} and using monotonicity of −log⁡(1−β)/β-\log(1-\beta)/\beta.

The theorem makes no assertion of natural density when 0<δ<10<\delta<1, and it does not control arbitrary moving residues with unbounded primewise collision multiplicities.

A sharper prime-power overlap criterion

Condition (2) can be weakened. For every block bb using a prime pp, put

ep,b=min⁡{vp(q):q∈Db, p∣q},Vp,b=[b]pep,b⊆Zp.e_{p,b}=\min\{v_p(q):q\in D_b,\ p\mid q\}, \qquad V_{p,b}=[b]_{p^{e_{p,b}}}\subseteq\mathbb Z_p.

It suffices that the balls Vp,bV_{p,b}, counted once for each block, have pointwise overlap at most RR for every prime pp. The theorem and its finite bound (3) then remain valid with this RR. Condition (2) implies this criterion, because Vp,b⊆[b]pV_{p,b}\subseteq[b]_p.

To verify the extension, fix the other coordinates. The block survivor factor is constant outside Vp,bV_{p,b}, and is at most this baseline everywhere. A finite family of pp-adic balls with overlap at most RR can be colored using RR colors so that balls of the same color are disjoint. Indeed, order the balls from larger to smaller, allowing repeated balls; all previously colored balls meeting a new ball contain it. At most R−1R-1 such balls exist, so greedy coloring works.

Let GjG_j be the product of the factors in color jj, padding with empty products if necessary. Hölder and the disjoint-support inequality used above give

Ep∏bfb≤∏j=1R(EpGjR)1/R≤∏b(EpfbR)1/R.\mathbb E_p\prod_b f_b \le\prod_{j=1}^R(\mathbb E_p G_j^R)^{1/R} \le\prod_b(\mathbb E_p f_b^R)^{1/R}.

The second inequality applies to the factors fbRf_b^R within each color. Integration and positive roots preserve the baseline and the suppression property outside each remaining prime's prescribed ball. Thus the coordinate induction proving (7), and all subsequent steps, apply unchanged. Infinite blocks follow by finite truncation: the balls needed for a truncation are contained in the displayed Vp,bV_{p,b}.