Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Bounded prime rank


The later one-unbounded-prime-power theorem allows arbitrary exponents at one distinguished prime per modulus and bounded complementary Ω\Omega. In particular it proves natural density for arbitrary singleton residues with ω(q)≤2\omega(q)\le2, without coherence. The subsequent squarefull-kernel theorem extends this to all bounded-ω\omega singleton systems, and more generally to bounded numbers of prime factors occurring to exponent exactly one.

Theorem: proved

Write Ω(q)\Omega(q) for the number of prime factors of qq, counted with multiplicity. If sup⁡iΩ(ni)<∞\sup_i\Omega(n_i)<\infty, the delayed survivor set in Problem 25 has natural density, equal to its finite-periodic candidate δ\delta. More precisely, the delayed excluded union has finite-periodic approximation in upper natural density.

The proof actually permits several residues at each modulus. It therefore does not address the distinctive difficulty of unbounded-rank singleton families. Duplicate congruence pairs can be discarded, so each modulus has only finitely many distinct normalized residues. No theorem from an external source is required below.

A finite counting and harmonic estimate

Let Ci=[ai]qiC_i=[a_i]_{q_i} be finitely many full congruence classes, with 0≤ai<qi0\le a_i<q_i, and let

Bi=Ci∩[qi,∞),B=⋃iBi,β=μ(⋃iCi),B_i=C_i\cap[q_i,\infty),\qquad B=\bigcup_iB_i, \qquad \beta=\mu\left(\bigcup_iC_i\right),

where μ\mu is Haar probability on Z^\widehat{\mathbb Z}, equivalently periodic density for this finite family. Define

κ(q)=∑d∣qφ(d)d=∏pe∥q(1+e(1−1/p)).\kappa(q)=\sum_{d\mid q}\frac{\varphi(d)}d =\prod_{p^e\Vert q}\left(1+e(1-1/p)\right).

Then, for every X≥1X\ge1,

∣B∩[1,X]∣≤βXmax⁡iκ(qi),HB(X)≤βH⌊X⌋max⁡iκ(qi).(1)|B\cap[1,X]|\le \beta X\max_i\kappa(q_i), \qquad H_B(X)\le \beta H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}\max_i\kappa(q_i). \tag{1}

In particular Ω(qi)≤r\Omega(q_i)\le r gives the constant 2r2^r, since κ(q)≤τ(q)≤2Ω(q)\kappa(q)\le\tau(q)\le2^{\Omega(q)}.

Proof. Partition the actually deleted integers among their first covering classes, obtaining disjoint sets Ei⊆BiE_i\subseteq B_i. In the counting version put ci=∣Ei∩[1,X]∣/Xc_i=|E_i\cap[1,X]|/X and α=∑ici\alpha=\sum_i c_i. For every divisor-face [b]d[b]_d put

Sd,b=∑i:d∣qiai≡b(modd)ci.S_{d,b}=\sum_{\substack{i:d\mid q_i\\a_i\equiv b\pmod d}}c_i.

All points counted by this sum lie in the delayed class {n≥d:n≡b(modd)}\{n\ge d:n\equiv b\pmod d\}: activation gives n≥qi≥dn\ge q_i\ge d. Consequently Sd,b≤1/dS_{d,b}\le1/d.

On Haar space set Z=∑iqici1CiZ=\sum_i q_i c_i\mathbf1_{C_i}. Then EZ=α\mathbb EZ=\alpha and ZZ vanishes off a set of measure β\beta. Compatible pairs of classes have intersection measure 1/lcm⁡(qi,qj)1/\operatorname{lcm}(q_i,q_j); incompatible pairs have empty intersection. Using gcd⁡(qi,qj)=∑d∣qi,qjφ(d)\gcd(q_i,q_j)=\sum_{d\mid q_i,q_j}\varphi(d),

EZ2=∑i,j: ai≡aj(modgcd⁡(qi,qj))cicjgcd⁡(qi,qj)≤∑dφ(d)∑b mod dSd,b2≤∑dφ(d)d∑b mod dSd,b=∑iκ(qi)ci.(2)\begin{aligned} \mathbb EZ^2 &=\sum_{\substack{i,j:\ a_i\equiv a_j\pmod{\gcd(q_i,q_j)}}} c_ic_j\gcd(q_i,q_j)\\ &\le\sum_d\varphi(d)\sum_{b\bmod d}S_{d,b}^2\\ &\le\sum_d\frac{\varphi(d)}d\sum_{b\bmod d}S_{d,b} =\sum_i\kappa(q_i)c_i. \tag{2} \end{aligned}

The first inequality can be strict: an incompatible pair may agree modulo a proper divisor of its gcd and hence contribute to the right side. Cauchy--Schwarz now gives α2≤βEZ2≤β(max⁡iκ(qi))α\alpha^2\le\beta\mathbb EZ^2\le\beta(\max_i\kappa(q_i))\alpha, proving the counting statement.

For the harmonic statement instead take ci=HEi(X)/H⌊X⌋c_i=H_{E_i}(X)/H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}. The same argument applies because

∑n≤X, n≥dn≡b(modd)1n≤1dH⌊X/d⌋≤1dH⌊X⌋.\sum_{\substack{n\le X\,,\ n\ge d\\n\equiv b\pmod d}}\frac1n \le\frac1d H_{\lfloor X/d\rfloor} \le\frac1d H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}.

Thus (2) and Cauchy--Schwarz remain valid. □\square

The more informative form of (2) is α2≤β∑iκ(qi)ci\alpha^2\le\beta\sum_i\kappa(q_i)c_i; replacing its weighted factor by a universal constant is not justified.

Proof of the theorem

We prove by induction on rr that every family of congruence pairs with Ω(q)≤r\Omega(q)\le r has finite-periodic approximation in upper natural density. Multiple distinct residues per modulus are allowed in the inductive statement. The case r=0r=0 has only modulus 11 and is immediate.

Let UU be the union of the full cylinders and β=μ(U)\beta=\mu(U). If β=1\beta=1, finite truncations already force the delayed excluded union BB to have natural density 11. If FF is a finite subfamily, then d(B∖BF)=1−d(BF)d(B\setminus B_F)=1-d(B_F), which tends to zero as finite truncations exhaust the family. This proves the desired approximation in this case.

Suppose β<1\beta<1. For N≥2N\ge2, let UNU_N be the union of those full classes whose moduli have no prime factor at most NN, and let BNB_N be their actual delayed union. On the product of independent prime-adic Haar coordinates, UNU_N depends only on primes greater than NN. The sets UNU_N decrease, and their intersection is a prime-coordinate tail event. Kolmogorov's zero--one law and μ(⋂NUN)≤β<1\mu(\bigcap_N U_N)\le\beta<1 give

μN:=μ(UN)⟶0.(3)\mu_N:=\mu(U_N)\longrightarrow0. \tag{3}

Here the zero--one law follows because the tail event is independent of every finite set of prime coordinates, hence of the whole product sigma-field and therefore of itself. For each fixed XX, only finitely many of these classes can be active: their moduli are at most XX, and there are finitely many residues per modulus. Applying (1) to those classes gives the uniform bound

∣BN∩[1,X]∣≤2rμNX.(4)|B_N\cap[1,X]|\le2^r\mu_N X. \tag{4}

It remains to handle the nonrough moduli, for a fixed NN. Partition their classes according to a chosen prime divisor p≤Np\le N and the residue b=ai mod pb=a_i\bmod p, where 0≤b<p0\le b<p. There are finitely many such groups. In one group write

qi=pmi,ai=b+pci.q_i=pm_i,\qquad a_i=b+pc_i.

The substitution n=b+ptn=b+pt identifies its delayed exclusions exactly with

t≥mi,t≡ci(modmi).(5)t\ge m_i,\qquad t\equiv c_i\pmod{m_i}. \tag{5}

Indeed b+pt≥pmib+pt\ge pm_i is equivalent to t≥mit\ge m_i, because 0≤b<p0\le b<p. Moreover Ω(mi)≤r−1\Omega(m_i)\le r-1. By induction the quotient family has finite-periodic natural approximation. Its image under t↦b+ptt\mapsto b+pt has the same property, with densities divided by pp. Finite unions of these groups retain that property: the omitted union is bounded by the sum of the omitted upper densities.

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, first choose NN so that 2rμN<ε/22^r\mu_N<\varepsilon/2. Then choose finitely many classes in each nonrough group so that the sum of their omitted upper densities is less than ε/2\varepsilon/2. The union FF of these finite selections satisfies

d‾(B∖BF)<ε\overline d(B\setminus B_F)<\varepsilon

by (4). An original finite initial segment can include FF. Thus BB has natural density β\beta, and its complement has natural density 1−β=δ1-\beta=\delta. Natural density implies logarithmic density by partial summation. □\square

Coherent bounded distinct-prime rank

A further proved case allows unbounded exponents. Suppose the residues come from one α∈Z^\alpha\in\widehat{\mathbb Z} and ω(qi)≤r\omega(q_i)\le r, where ω\omega counts distinct prime factors. Then the same natural-density conclusion holds.

For an integer E≥2E\ge2, a modulus divisible by pEp^E has its full class contained in α(modpE)\alpha\pmod{p^E}. Its delayed hits have n≥qi≥pEn\ge q_i\ge p^E. The union over moduli with any exponent at least EE therefore has, uniformly in XX, at most

X∑pp−EX\sum_p p^{-E}

hits below XX. This tends to zero after division by XX as E→∞E\to\infty. All remaining moduli have Ω(qi)≤r(E−1)\Omega(q_i)\le r(E-1) and are covered by the theorem. Finite-periodic approximation follows by truncating EE and then using that theorem. Coherence is essential to this particular high-power bound: without it, the projected residues modulo pEp^E need not be the same.

Bounded pairwise common rank

Two further natural-density cases follow by a summable-tail reduction. For any fixed k≥0k\ge0:

  • Arbitrary residues are allowed if Ω((qi,qj))≤k\Omega((q_i,q_j))\le k whenever i≠ji\ne j.
  • Coherent residues are allowed if ω((qi,qj))≤k\omega((q_i,q_j))\le k whenever i≠ji\ne j.

For the first assertion, retain the moduli with Ω(q)≤k+1\Omega(q)\le k+1; the established bounded-Ω\Omega theorem applies. For each remaining qq, let dd be the product of its k+1k+1 smallest prime factors, counting multiplicity, and let pp be the largest prime factor of dd. No two moduli can have the same dd, since then their gcd would have at least k+1k+1 prime factors counted with multiplicity. Also q≥dpq\ge dp. Consequently

∑Ω(q)≥k+21q≤∑p1≤⋯≤pk+11p1⋯pkpk+12≤∑m≥2Hmkm2<∞.\sum_{\Omega(q)\ge k+2}\frac1q \le\sum_{p_1\le\cdots\le p_{k+1}} \frac1{p_1\cdots p_k p_{k+1}^2} \le\sum_{m\ge2}\frac{H_m^k}{m^2}<\infty.

The removed family is therefore covered by the summable case.

For the second assertion use the k+1k+1 smallest distinct prime factors of every modulus with ω(q)≥k+2\omega(q)\ge k+2. The same injection and convergent majorant apply. The retained coherent family has bounded ω\omega and is covered by the preceding theorem. In both cases the two subfamilies have finite-periodic natural approximation, so their union does too.

This reduction does not extend the theorem to arbitrary residues with bounded ω(q)\omega(q). Indeed the fixed-rank product obstruction shows that even at ω(q)≤3\omega(q)\le3, distinctness and all divisor-face capacities alone cannot supply the needed uniform bound. Its abstract weights have not been realized as first-kill masses.