Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Further restrictions on two-cover diameter graphs
All multiplicities count unordered pairs. These results extend the star-diameter theorem, but do not settle either unrestricted question.
A bound for a two-vertex diameter cover
Let be the two largest distances. Suppose the diameter graph has vertex-cover number exactly two, and choose a cover . Put
Then and
In particular, is rare if , or if and .
Normalize , and let , of diameter at most one. Both cover points have diameter neighbors in , since the graph is not a star. Write for their unit neighbors in , and put , . If is the number of globally unit-inactive vertices, then
Indeed, lies on an arc of angular width at most : its points are within one of a fixed diameter neighbor of , initially restricting them to an arc of width less than , and its extreme members are at distance at most one. The unit-circle arc lemma makes every nonextreme member isolated in the unit graph on . The same applies to . If , at least of these points are isolated on , in addition to globally inactive vertices of . Apply the diameter bound after removing these isolates and then add the unit edges touching the cover. This proves (2) when both cover vertices are active. An inactive cover vertex removes two possible extreme positions from this count, so (2) remains valid with all inactive vertices included in .
We have . Otherwise two common neighbors may be written , and the cover points as , , with . Every point lies in both unit disks about , and hence
Only lie on the boundary of the enclosing radius- disk. Thus is the unique diameter, contrary to the cover number.
There is at most one common diameter neighbor. Two such neighbors would give . Each of lies on a radius- arc of angular width less than . The radius- arc inequality in star_diameter makes every interior member of unit-inactive in ; its only possible unit neighbor in is . If , the same inequality applied to rules out that neighbor. If , the common diameter neighbor is an extreme of the arc (otherwise its distances to the two extremes give the same contradiction). The radius- circle about meets the unit disk about in an arc of angular width less than . One extreme of lies outside that disk and the other lies inside or on it. Consequently at most one interior member of lies on the unit circle about . The identical argument applies to .
The interiors of the two arcs are disjoint, so, writing ,
Now (2), , and prove (1).
A regular even polygon cannot acquire a noncentral point
A regular even -gon, , admits no new noncentral point whose distances to all its vertices belong to its chord palette. Its center is admissible exactly when .
Normalize its circumradius to one and write . A noncentral point has at most two vertices at each prescribed distance, so all chord lengths must occur exactly twice among its pinned distances. Since , averaging squares gives
There is a vertex within angle of the direction , and its squared distance from is at least
using and . This exceeds the polygon diameter. For the center, admissibility is exactly , or .
Consequently, if is even, the only diameter pairs are two disjoint pairs, and every point is second-distance-active, then . Under , the pair budget gives . Delete the four diameter endpoints to obtain , of size . Every remaining point has a supporting radius- disk containing , centered at one of its -neighbors. Thus is strictly convex, and
For , the checked Fishburn equality classification makes a regular even polygon or a regular odd polygon minus one vertex. The former admits only its center as a possible added point by the preceding lemma; the latter admits only its missing vertex by the checked palette lemma. Neither admits the four deleted points with the required palette. The smaller even orders are covered by small_orders.
The square endpoint case
Suppose the only diameter pairs are the diagonals of a unit square, and the second-largest distance is one. All remaining points lie in
Set and . The set lies in the radius- disk, meeting its boundary only at the four junctions . Let of these junctions be present and let other points lie in the interior of . Since , each nonjunction boundary point has one unit corner neighbor, each junction has two, and interior points have none. Therefore
If this class is rich, . Under that richness assumption, if two opposite junctions are present, their distance is a second rare distance. There are at most two -pairs within , all opposite junction pairs. Each nonjunction boundary point has at most one corner neighbor at distance , each junction has none, and each interior point has at most two. Hence
To check those corner bounds, equal distances to two square corners put a point on an axis or a diagonal. At its intersections with , the repeated corner radii are , , or , none equal to . Three equidistant corners force the square center, with radius .
The endpoint-specific bound shows that two disjoint diameter pairs and force their endpoints to form this square. Then forces all four junctions, so the sharp case is excluded for every order. For even , the same bound also excludes . If the minimum cross-pair unit degree is one, equality in the endpoint bound gives full activity, which was excluded above. If that minimum is two, the endpoints form a square; now gives , hence two opposite junctions and the second rare distance. The bound excludes the remaining minimum-degree-zero case directly. Likewise, is excluded at even order when some endpoint has no unit neighbor among the other diameter pair: equality in its bound again gives full activity.
Remaining cases and checks
Few diameter edges with inactive points remain untreated. At odd order, even full second-distance activity leaves the convex core one distance above its classified minimum. No general conclusion for these cases is asserted.
The author checked the cover count, both arc arguments, the enclosing-disk test, the even-polygon averaging, the square equations and corner radii, and the equality applications; the argument is author-recorded. The classification inputs were checked in the supplied full Fishburn paper by the earlier referenced proofs.