Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Two rare distances with all but three points on a circle


Theorem. Let AA be an nn-point planar set, n≥5n\ge5. If n−3n-3 points of AA are concyclic, then R(A)≥2R(A)\ge2.

The other three points may be anywhere. The proof extends the two-off-circle theorem by two further regular-polygon palette lemmas and three radius-palette tests. It uses the checked small-order theorem, the unique-diameter theorem, and the elementary small-difference lemma already proved in the two-off-circle note. No asymptotic circle theorem or general near-minimum convex classification is needed.

The argument below was developed by a separate author and checked by the author; it is author-recorded. This note concerns a restricted family, not the unrestricted questions in Problem 132.

1. Two further regular-polygon palette extensions

Let VV be a regular kk-gon on the unit circle, and let P(V)P(V) be its positive chord-length palette.

Palette extension lemma. No point off the circumcircle and off its center has all distances to CC in P(V)P(V) in either of these cases:

  • k≥8k\ge8 is even and CC is VV minus two vertices;
  • k≥9k\ge9 is odd and CC is VV minus three vertices.

Write M=⌊k/2⌋M=\lfloor k/2\rfloor. In both cases ∣C∣=2M−2>M|C|=2M-2>M. A noncentral pin has at most two circle points at any prescribed distance, so at least one pinned distance is repeated. Reflection in the line joining the center to the pin exchanges its two circle points. Since these points are vertices of VV, this line is a reflection axis of VV. Different reflection orbits give different pinned values. As there are at most MM available values, at most two singleton reflection orbits survive in CC.

1.1. Even order: reflection patterns

An edge-midpoint axis has no fixed vertices. If the two holes are not exchanged by reflection, every pinned orbit survives. The pin then has the same spectrum as on VV, contrary to the existing even full-polygon palette lemma. Thus its holes form an exchanged pair.

A vertex axis has two fixed vertices. If exactly one hole is fixed, deleting the other hole, which is one member of a pair, leaves the pinned spectrum unchanged from VV minus the fixed hole. The existing even one-hole lemma excludes this. If neither hole is fixed and they are not exchanged, four singletons survive, impossible. If neither is fixed and they are exchanged, both fixed vertices survive, and there are MM pinned values. Thus the pinned palette equals P(V)P(V). Its maximum is ∣p∣+1|p|+1, whereas max⁡P(V)=2\max P(V)=2, forcing ∣p∣=1|p|=1. The only remaining vertex-axis case has the two fixed vertices as holes.

Put

a=π/k,c=cos⁡a,T=cos⁡(2a),s=sin⁡a.a=\pi/k,\qquad c=\cos a,\qquad T=\cos(2a),\qquad s=\sin a.

Here 0<a≤π/8<π/60<a\le\pi/8<\pi/6.

1.2. Even order: an edge axis with exchanged holes

Orient the axis toward the pin and put r=∣p∣>0r=|p|>0. Its cosine list is

E={cos⁡((2j−1)a):1≤j≤M}∖{et}.E=\{\cos((2j-1)a):1\le j\le M\}\setminus\{e_t\}.

There are M−1M-1 pinned values, so their squared palette equals

{2−2cos⁡(2ja):1≤j≤M}∖{du2}.\{2-2\cos(2ja):1\le j\le M\}\setminus\{d_u^2\}.

The full midpoint cosine list has range 2c2c, reduced to 2cT2cT if one endpoint is deleted. The target cosine list has range 2c22c^2, 2T22T^2, or 2T2T, according as the omitted entry is interior, first, or last.

Suppose the nearest pair, at angle aa, survives. Comparing the squared-distance ranges gives

T2c≤r≤cT.\frac{T^2}{c}\le r\le\frac cT.

Both endpoints lie strictly between c−3sc-\sqrt3s and c+3sc+\sqrt3s. Indeed,

c−T2c=s2(4c2−1)c<3s,cT−c=2cs2T<3s.c-\frac{T^2}{c}=\frac{s^2(4c^2-1)}c<\sqrt3s, \qquad \frac cT-c=\frac{2cs^2}{T}<\sqrt3s.

The first inequality follows from (4c2−1)tan⁡a<3tan⁡a<3(4c^2-1)\tan a<3\tan a<\sqrt3, and the second from tan⁡(2a)<3\tan(2a)<\sqrt3. Therefore the smallest pinned square is

(r−c)2+s2<4s2,(r-c)^2+s^2<4s^2,

smaller than the shortest squared chord, a contradiction.

If the nearest pair is deleted, the smallest surviving angle is 3a3a. Its distance is at least sin⁡(3a)>2sin⁡a\sin(3a)>2\sin a. Thus the shortest chord is absent from the pinned spectrum: the target omits its first entry. Range comparison now gives r=T/cr=T/c. But

(1+r2−2rcos⁡(3a))−4sin⁡2(2a)=(T−1)(4T+3)T+1<0,\bigl(1+r^2-2r\cos(3a)\bigr)-4\sin^2(2a) =\frac{(T-1)(4T+3)}{T+1}<0,

contrary to matching the new smallest target chord.

1.3. Even order: a vertex axis with fixed holes

The cosine list is

{cos⁡(2ja):1≤j≤M−1},\{\cos(2ja):1\le j\le M-1\},

of range 2T2T. It is symmetric, so the sign of the real pin is irrelevant. If the target omits its first, last, or an interior chord, range comparison gives, respectively,

r=T,r=1,r=1+T2T.r=T,\qquad r=1,\qquad r=\frac{1+T}{2T}.

The middle case is on the circle. In the first case the smallest pinned square is 1−T21-T^2, while the smallest target square is 4(1−T2)4(1-T^2). In the last case minimum equality would require r2=2−Tr^2=2-T, whereas

r2−(2−T)=(T−1)2(4T+1)4T2>0.r^2-(2-T)=\frac{(T-1)^2(4T+1)}{4T^2}>0.

This proves the even part of the lemma.

1.4. Odd order: reduction to one deletion in two cosine lists

There is one fixed vertex. If it is deleted and the other two holes are not exchanged, no paired pinned orbit disappears. The pin has the same spectrum as VV minus its fixed vertex, excluded by the existing odd one-hole lemma.

If the fixed vertex survives, the three holes must contain an exchanged pair; otherwise four singleton orbits survive. The third hole removes just one vertex of a surviving pair. Thus the pinned spectrum is the same as for VV minus the exchanged pair, excluded by the existing odd two-hole lemma.

The remaining holes are the fixed vertex and one exchanged pair. Normalize the fixed vertex to 11 and write the pin as signed real ρ\rho, where ρ≠0\rho\ne0 and ∣ρ∣≠1|\rho|\ne1. Put

a=π/k,c=cos⁡a,t=cos⁡(2a),w=cos⁡(4a),v3=cos⁡(3a),a=\pi/k,\quad c=\cos a,\quad t=\cos(2a),\quad w=\cos(4a),\quad v_3=\cos(3a),

and

F={cos⁡(2ja):1≤j≤M}.F=\{\cos(2ja):1\le j\le M\}.

There are M−1M-1 pinned values. Hence, for sets EE and GG each obtained from FF by deleting one entry,

G=ρE+(1−ρ2)/2.(1)G=\rho E+(1-\rho^2)/2. \tag{1}

For either deletion, use type I for an interior deletion, type F for a first-entry deletion, and type L for a last-entry deletion. Their extrema are as follows.

TypeMaximumNegative minimumRange
IttccL0=t+cL_0=t+c
FwwccL1=w+cL_1=w+c
Lttv3v_3L2=t+v3L_2=t+v_3

Set u=2c−1u=2c-1 and v=4c2−2c−1v=4c^2-2c-1. Direct factorization gives

L0=(1+c)u,L1=(1+c)uv,L2=(1+c)v,L_0=(1+c)u,\qquad L_1=(1+c)uv,\qquad L_2=(1+c)v,

with

0<L1<L2<L0,0<v<u<1.0<L_1<L_2<L_0,\qquad0<v<u<1.

Here c>3/2c>\sqrt3/2 ensures v>0v>0, and u−v=4c(1−c)>0u-v=4c(1-c)>0.

1.5. Odd order: positive signed radius

If ρ>1\rho>1, the affine map in (1) strictly decreases every x<1x<1. Thus max⁡G<max⁡E\max G<\max E, forcing EE to have type I or L and GG type F. But then range⁡G<range⁡E\operatorname{range}G<\operatorname{range}E, forcing ρ<1\rho<1.

If 0<ρ<10<\rho<1, range comparison gives

ρ≥L1/L0=v>2t−1.\rho\ge L_1/L_0=v>2t-1.

The last inequality is v−(2t−1)=2(1−c)>0v-(2t-1)=2(1-c)>0.

The affine map therefore strictly increases every x≤tx\le t. Consequently max⁡G>max⁡E\max G>\max E, forcing EE type F and GG type I or L. Their range ratio is greater than one, again a contradiction.

1.6. Odd order: negative signed radius and the nonagon check

Put r=−ρ>0r=-\rho>0. Equal deletion types force r=1r=1, excluded by hypothesis. For different types,

r=range⁡Grange⁡E.r=\frac{\operatorname{range}G}{\operatorname{range}E}.

If max⁡G=f\max G=f and min⁡E=−C0\min E=-C_0, the maximum equation requires

H:=2f−2rC0−1+r2=0.H:=2f-2rC_0-1+r^2=0.

Substitution and factorization give this finite table.

Type of EEType of GGrrHH
IFvv2(c−1)(2c−1)(2c+1)(4c+1)2(c-1)(2c-1)(2c+1)(4c+1)
ILv/uv/u2(c−1)(8c3−6c+1)/u22(c-1)(8c^3-6c+1)/u^2
FI1/v1/v2(c−1)(2c−1)(2c+1)(8c3−6c−1)/v22(c-1)(2c-1)(2c+1)(8c^3-6c-1)/v^2
FL1/u1/u2(c−1)(8c3−6c+1)/u22(c-1)(8c^3-6c+1)/u^2
LIu/vu/v−2(c−1)(8c3+4c2−6c−1)/v2-2(c-1)(8c^3+4c^2-6c-1)/v^2
LFuu2(c−1)(4c2+4c−1)2(c-1)(4c^2+4c-1)

For k≥11k\ge11 every entry is nonzero: 8c3−6c=2cos⁡(3a)>18c^3-6c=2\cos(3a)>1, and all remaining displayed factors other than c−1c-1 are positive. For k=9k=9, all remain nonzero except type F to type I.

In that exceptional case M=4M=4, t=cos⁡(2π/9)t=\cos(2\pi/9), and r=1/v=2tr=1/v=2t. The last identity follows from

2tv−1=(2c−1)(8c3−6c−1)=0.2tv-1=(2c-1)(8c^3-6c-1)=0.

The source set EE has entries cos⁡(4π/9),−1/2,−c\cos(4\pi/9),-1/2,-c. The affine image of its middle entry is

z=(1+2t−4t2)/2.z=(1+2t-4t^2)/2.

Since 3/4<t<4/53/4<t<4/5, one has

0<z<cos⁡(4π/9)=2t2−1.0<z<\cos(4\pi/9)=2t^2-1.

The bounds on tt follow from t>1/2t>1/2, 4t3−3t=−1/24t^3-3t=-1/2, and monotonicity of 4x3−3x4x^3-3x for x>1/2x>1/2. The first inequality for zz follows by substituting t<4/5t<4/5 into its decreasing quadratic; the second follows from w−z=(4t−3)(2t+1)/2>0w-z=(4t-3)(2t+1)/2>0 when t>3/4t>3/4. But GG has unchanged endpoints t,−ct,-c and middle entry either cos⁡(4π/9)\cos(4\pi/9) or −1/2-1/2. Neither equals zz. Thus (1) fails also for k=9k=9, proving the odd part of the lemma.

2. Adding the radius to the chord palette

Three supplementary tests handle an added point at the center.

Radius-palette lemma. Let VV lie on the unit circle and write P=P(V)P=P(V). No noncentral off-circle point has all distances to CC in P∪{1}P\cup\{1\} in any of these cases:

  • V=CV=C is a regular odd polygon of order at least nine;
  • V=CV=C is a regular even polygon of order at least eight and 1∉P1\notin P;
  • VV is a regular odd polygon of order at least nine and CC is VV minus one vertex.

2.1. A full odd polygon

Write k=2m+1k=2m+1. The pin has a repeated distance and hence lies on a reflection axis. Its spectrum has m+1m+1 entries and equals P∪{1}P\cup\{1\}, since an odd regular polygon has no chord of length one. Normalize its fixed vertex to 11 and write the pin as signed ρ\rho. Put M=m+1M=m+1.

The cosine list {cos⁡(2πj/k):0≤j≤m}\{\cos(2\pi j/k):0\le j\le m\} has sum 1/21/2 and square sum (2m+3)/4(2m+3)/4. Comparing first and second power sums of the squared palettes gives

Mρ2−ρ−M=0,ρ2=2M(M−1)(2M−1)(M+1)<1.M\rho^2-\rho-M=0,\qquad \rho^2=\frac{2M(M-1)}{(2M-1)(M+1)}<1.

For completeness, the target sums are 2M2M and 6M−26M-2. After using the first equality, the second pinned sum is 4M+(2M+1−1/M)ρ24M+(2M+1-1/M)\rho^2, giving the displayed formula. The first equality now gives

ρ=−M(3M−1)(2M−1)(M+1)<−1,\rho=-\frac{M(3M-1)}{(2M-1)(M+1)}<-1,

because numerator minus denominator is (M−1)2>0(M-1)^2>0. This contradicts ρ2<1\rho^2<1.

2.2. A full even polygon

Write k=2mk=2m. Again the pin lies on a reflection axis. A vertex-axis pin has m+1m+1 distinct values and uses the full augmented palette. The sum of its squared distances is (m+1)(1+r2)(m+1)(1+r^2), whereas the target sum is 2m+32m+3. Thus r2=1+1/(m+1)>1r^2=1+1/(m+1)>1, and the opposite vertex has distance r+1>2=max⁡(P∪{1})r+1>2=\max(P\cup\{1\}), impossible.

An edge-axis pin has mm distinct values. The existing full-polygon lemma excludes using only PP. Thus the pin replaces one chord square 2−2b2-2b, where b=cos⁡(jπ/m)b=\cos(j\pi/m), by 11. The midpoint cosine list has sum zero and square sum m/2m/2; the chord cosine list has sum −1-1 and square sum m/2m/2. The first two moments give

m(1+r2)=2m+1+2b,m(1+r^2)=2m+1+2b, m(1+4r2+r4)=6m+5+8b−4b2.m(1+4r^2+r^4)=6m+5+8b-4b^2.

Eliminating r2r^2 yields (1+1/m)(1+2b)2=0(1+1/m)(1+2b)^2=0, hence r2=1r^2=1, again impossible.

2.3. An odd polygon minus one vertex

Write k=2m+1k=2m+1, with m≥4m\ge4. The pin is on a reflection axis. If its fixed vertex is not the hole, removal of the hole does not remove a pinned value; Section 2.1 applies.

Otherwise put the fixed hole at 11 and write the pin as signed ρ\rho. It has mm pinned values. The existing odd one-hole lemma excludes using only PP, so its squared palette replaces one chord square 2−2b2-2b, where b=cos⁡(2πj/k)b=\cos(2\pi j/k), by 11. Since 11 lies between the shortest and longest chords, the target squared-distance palette has range at most that of the old squared chord palette. The squared pinned palette has range ∣ρ∣|\rho| times that old range, so ∣ρ∣≤1|\rho|\le1. Since the pin is off the circle, ∣ρ∣<1|\rho|<1.

The first moment gives

mρ2+ρ−m−2b=0.m\rho^2+\rho-m-2b=0.

The second moment, after substituting bb from this equality, factors as

(ρ2−1)[m(m+1)ρ2+2(m+1)ρ−m(m−1)]=0.(\rho^2-1) \bigl[m(m+1)\rho^2+2(m+1)\rho-m(m-1)\bigr]=0.

Let Q(x)=m(m+1)x2+2(m+1)x−m(m−1)Q(x)=m(m+1)x^2+2(m+1)x-m(m-1). Since Q(−1)=−2<0Q(-1)=-2<0 and Q(0)<0Q(0)<0, its negative root is less than −1-1. Thus ρ\rho is its positive root. Combining Q(ρ)=0Q(\rho)=0 with the first moment yields

ρ=−2b−2mm+1<2m+1.\rho=-2b-\frac{2m}{m+1}<\frac2{m+1}.

But

Q(2m+1)=4mm+1+4−m(m−1)<8−12<0,Q\left(\frac2{m+1}\right) =\frac{4m}{m+1}+4-m(m-1)<8-12<0,

so the positive root is greater than 2/(m+1)2/(m+1). This contradiction completes the radius-palette lemma.

3. Proof of the theorem

The small-order theorem covers 5≤n≤105\le n\le10. Assume n≥11n\ge11 and R(A)=1R(A)=1. Let CC be the h=n−3h=n-3 points on the chosen circle. If another point lies on that circle, the two-off-circle theorem gives a contradiction. Thus B=A∖CB=A\setminus C consists of three off-circle points.

The pair budget and the unique-diameter theorem give

q(A)≤{n/2−1,n even,(n−1)/2,n odd.q(A)\le \begin{cases} n/2-1,&n\text{ even},\\ (n-1)/2,&n\text{ odd}. \end{cases}

Equivalently, q(A)≤⌊h/2⌋+1q(A)\le\lfloor h/2\rfloor+1. For the angle set SS of CC,

h≤∣S−S∣≤2q(A)+1≤{h+2,h odd,h+3,h even.h\le|S-S|\le2q(A)+1\le \begin{cases} h+2,&h\text{ odd},\\ h+3,&h\text{ even}. \end{cases}

These upper bounds are strictly below 3h/23h/2, since h≥8h\ge8. The elementary small-difference lemma makes S−SS-S a finite subgroup of the circle group. Therefore CC lies in a regular kk-gon VV with

{h≤k≤h+2,h odd,h≤k≤h+3,h even.\begin{cases} h\le k\le h+2,&h\text{ odd},\\ h\le k\le h+3,&h\text{ even}. \end{cases}

Normalize its circumradius to one. Every chord value of VV survives in CC: at most three deletions remove at most six edges from a nondiametral class, which originally has k≥8k\ge8 edges. At even order a diametral class survives because fewer than k/2k/2 vertices were deleted. Write P=P(V)P=P(V).

If ⌊k/2⌋=⌊h/2⌋+1\lfloor k/2\rfloor=\lfloor h/2\rfloor+1, then PP exhausts the allowed distance count. The possibilities are an even polygon minus one or two vertices, or an odd polygon minus two or three vertices. The old palette lemmas and Section 1 exclude every noncentral point of BB. This is impossible since BB has three points.

The remaining cases are that CC is a full odd regular polygon, a full even regular polygon, or an odd regular polygon minus one vertex. Here PP has ⌊h/2⌋\lfloor h/2\rfloor values, leaving at most one extra value.

First suppose no point of BB is the center. Any value outside PP has at most

2∣B∣+(∣B∣2)=9≤n2|B|+\binom{|B|}{2}=9\le n

pairs, so it is rare. There must be such a value: a noncentral pin on a full odd polygon has more pinned values than ∣P∣|P|, and in the other two cases the old palette lemmas exclude using only PP. Thus there is exactly one new value DD, which must be the diameter. In particular, D>max⁡PD>\max P.

Each pin must see DD on CC, since using only PP is impossible. Delete its one or two DD-neighbors from CC. All remaining distances from that pin lie in PP. The remaining circular set is, respectively, an odd polygon minus one or two vertices, an even polygon minus one or two vertices, or an odd polygon minus two or three vertices. The old palette lemmas and Section 1 exclude the pin in every case. The thresholds apply even at n=11n=11: the smallest even polygon here has order eight and the smallest odd polygon has order nine.

Finally suppose the center belongs to BB. In the odd cases, the radius 11 is not in PP, so it is the only extra value. Sections 2.1 and 2.3 exclude either noncentral pin. In the even case, if 1∉P1\notin P, Section 2.2 does the same. If 1∈P1\in P, any new value again has at most nine pairs: the center contributes no core pairs at a value outside PP. The preceding new-diameter and deletion argument applies to either noncentral pin. All cases contradict R(A)=1R(A)=1, proving the theorem.

Verification and scope

The new finite algebra consists of six factored extremum identities, the explicit nonagon middle-entry check, and the three moment arguments. A separate author checked all identities, including a bounded symbolic check of the six table entries. The author checked the reflection patterns, range comparisons, nonagon inequalities, and final reduction; the argument is author-recorded. The author also checked the extension lemmas and the radius-palette lemmas with the final reduction; both audits passed without gaps.

This establishes an exact finite bound for three circular exceptions. It does not extract a large circular subset from arbitrary planar sets, and does not settle the unrestricted first assertion or asymptotic question.