Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Two rare distances with all but three points on a circle
Theorem. Let be an -point planar set, . If points of are concyclic, then .
The other three points may be anywhere. The proof extends the two-off-circle theorem by two further regular-polygon palette lemmas and three radius-palette tests. It uses the checked small-order theorem, the unique-diameter theorem, and the elementary small-difference lemma already proved in the two-off-circle note. No asymptotic circle theorem or general near-minimum convex classification is needed.
The argument below was developed by a separate author and checked by the author; it is author-recorded. This note concerns a restricted family, not the unrestricted questions in Problem 132.
1. Two further regular-polygon palette extensions
Let be a regular -gon on the unit circle, and let be its positive chord-length palette.
Palette extension lemma. No point off the circumcircle and off its center has all distances to in in either of these cases:
- is even and is minus two vertices;
- is odd and is minus three vertices.
Write . In both cases . A noncentral pin has at most two circle points at any prescribed distance, so at least one pinned distance is repeated. Reflection in the line joining the center to the pin exchanges its two circle points. Since these points are vertices of , this line is a reflection axis of . Different reflection orbits give different pinned values. As there are at most available values, at most two singleton reflection orbits survive in .
1.1. Even order: reflection patterns
An edge-midpoint axis has no fixed vertices. If the two holes are not exchanged by reflection, every pinned orbit survives. The pin then has the same spectrum as on , contrary to the existing even full-polygon palette lemma. Thus its holes form an exchanged pair.
A vertex axis has two fixed vertices. If exactly one hole is fixed, deleting the other hole, which is one member of a pair, leaves the pinned spectrum unchanged from minus the fixed hole. The existing even one-hole lemma excludes this. If neither hole is fixed and they are not exchanged, four singletons survive, impossible. If neither is fixed and they are exchanged, both fixed vertices survive, and there are pinned values. Thus the pinned palette equals . Its maximum is , whereas , forcing . The only remaining vertex-axis case has the two fixed vertices as holes.
Put
Here .
1.2. Even order: an edge axis with exchanged holes
Orient the axis toward the pin and put . Its cosine list is
There are pinned values, so their squared palette equals
The full midpoint cosine list has range , reduced to if one endpoint is deleted. The target cosine list has range , , or , according as the omitted entry is interior, first, or last.
Suppose the nearest pair, at angle , survives. Comparing the squared-distance ranges gives
Both endpoints lie strictly between and . Indeed,
The first inequality follows from , and the second from . Therefore the smallest pinned square is
smaller than the shortest squared chord, a contradiction.
If the nearest pair is deleted, the smallest surviving angle is . Its distance is at least . Thus the shortest chord is absent from the pinned spectrum: the target omits its first entry. Range comparison now gives . But
contrary to matching the new smallest target chord.
1.3. Even order: a vertex axis with fixed holes
The cosine list is
of range . It is symmetric, so the sign of the real pin is irrelevant. If the target omits its first, last, or an interior chord, range comparison gives, respectively,
The middle case is on the circle. In the first case the smallest pinned square is , while the smallest target square is . In the last case minimum equality would require , whereas
This proves the even part of the lemma.
1.4. Odd order: reduction to one deletion in two cosine lists
There is one fixed vertex. If it is deleted and the other two holes are not exchanged, no paired pinned orbit disappears. The pin has the same spectrum as minus its fixed vertex, excluded by the existing odd one-hole lemma.
If the fixed vertex survives, the three holes must contain an exchanged pair; otherwise four singleton orbits survive. The third hole removes just one vertex of a surviving pair. Thus the pinned spectrum is the same as for minus the exchanged pair, excluded by the existing odd two-hole lemma.
The remaining holes are the fixed vertex and one exchanged pair. Normalize the fixed vertex to and write the pin as signed real , where and . Put
and
There are pinned values. Hence, for sets and each obtained from by deleting one entry,
For either deletion, use type I for an interior deletion, type F for a first-entry deletion, and type L for a last-entry deletion. Their extrema are as follows.
| Type | Maximum | Negative minimum | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | |||
| F | |||
| L |
Set and . Direct factorization gives
with
Here ensures , and .
1.5. Odd order: positive signed radius
If , the affine map in (1) strictly decreases every . Thus , forcing to have type I or L and type F. But then , forcing .
If , range comparison gives
The last inequality is .
The affine map therefore strictly increases every . Consequently , forcing type F and type I or L. Their range ratio is greater than one, again a contradiction.
1.6. Odd order: negative signed radius and the nonagon check
Put . Equal deletion types force , excluded by hypothesis. For different types,
If and , the maximum equation requires
Substitution and factorization give this finite table.
| Type of | Type of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| I | F | ||
| I | L | ||
| F | I | ||
| F | L | ||
| L | I | ||
| L | F |
For every entry is nonzero: , and all remaining displayed factors other than are positive. For , all remain nonzero except type F to type I.
In that exceptional case , , and . The last identity follows from
The source set has entries . The affine image of its middle entry is
Since , one has
The bounds on follow from , , and monotonicity of for . The first inequality for follows by substituting into its decreasing quadratic; the second follows from when . But has unchanged endpoints and middle entry either or . Neither equals . Thus (1) fails also for , proving the odd part of the lemma.
2. Adding the radius to the chord palette
Three supplementary tests handle an added point at the center.
Radius-palette lemma. Let lie on the unit circle and write . No noncentral off-circle point has all distances to in in any of these cases:
- is a regular odd polygon of order at least nine;
- is a regular even polygon of order at least eight and ;
- is a regular odd polygon of order at least nine and is minus one vertex.
2.1. A full odd polygon
Write . The pin has a repeated distance and hence lies on a reflection axis. Its spectrum has entries and equals , since an odd regular polygon has no chord of length one. Normalize its fixed vertex to and write the pin as signed . Put .
The cosine list has sum and square sum . Comparing first and second power sums of the squared palettes gives
For completeness, the target sums are and . After using the first equality, the second pinned sum is , giving the displayed formula. The first equality now gives
because numerator minus denominator is . This contradicts .
2.2. A full even polygon
Write . Again the pin lies on a reflection axis. A vertex-axis pin has distinct values and uses the full augmented palette. The sum of its squared distances is , whereas the target sum is . Thus , and the opposite vertex has distance , impossible.
An edge-axis pin has distinct values. The existing full-polygon lemma excludes using only . Thus the pin replaces one chord square , where , by . The midpoint cosine list has sum zero and square sum ; the chord cosine list has sum and square sum . The first two moments give
Eliminating yields , hence , again impossible.
2.3. An odd polygon minus one vertex
Write , with . The pin is on a reflection axis. If its fixed vertex is not the hole, removal of the hole does not remove a pinned value; Section 2.1 applies.
Otherwise put the fixed hole at and write the pin as signed . It has pinned values. The existing odd one-hole lemma excludes using only , so its squared palette replaces one chord square , where , by . Since lies between the shortest and longest chords, the target squared-distance palette has range at most that of the old squared chord palette. The squared pinned palette has range times that old range, so . Since the pin is off the circle, .
The first moment gives
The second moment, after substituting from this equality, factors as
Let . Since and , its negative root is less than . Thus is its positive root. Combining with the first moment yields
But
so the positive root is greater than . This contradiction completes the radius-palette lemma.
3. Proof of the theorem
The small-order theorem covers . Assume and . Let be the points on the chosen circle. If another point lies on that circle, the two-off-circle theorem gives a contradiction. Thus consists of three off-circle points.
The pair budget and the unique-diameter theorem give
Equivalently, . For the angle set of ,
These upper bounds are strictly below , since . The elementary small-difference lemma makes a finite subgroup of the circle group. Therefore lies in a regular -gon with
Normalize its circumradius to one. Every chord value of survives in : at most three deletions remove at most six edges from a nondiametral class, which originally has edges. At even order a diametral class survives because fewer than vertices were deleted. Write .
If , then exhausts the allowed distance count. The possibilities are an even polygon minus one or two vertices, or an odd polygon minus two or three vertices. The old palette lemmas and Section 1 exclude every noncentral point of . This is impossible since has three points.
The remaining cases are that is a full odd regular polygon, a full even regular polygon, or an odd regular polygon minus one vertex. Here has values, leaving at most one extra value.
First suppose no point of is the center. Any value outside has at most
pairs, so it is rare. There must be such a value: a noncentral pin on a full odd polygon has more pinned values than , and in the other two cases the old palette lemmas exclude using only . Thus there is exactly one new value , which must be the diameter. In particular, .
Each pin must see on , since using only is impossible. Delete its one or two -neighbors from . All remaining distances from that pin lie in . The remaining circular set is, respectively, an odd polygon minus one or two vertices, an even polygon minus one or two vertices, or an odd polygon minus two or three vertices. The old palette lemmas and Section 1 exclude the pin in every case. The thresholds apply even at : the smallest even polygon here has order eight and the smallest odd polygon has order nine.
Finally suppose the center belongs to . In the odd cases, the radius is not in , so it is the only extra value. Sections 2.1 and 2.3 exclude either noncentral pin. In the even case, if , Section 2.2 does the same. If , any new value again has at most nine pairs: the center contributes no core pairs at a value outside . The preceding new-diameter and deletion argument applies to either noncentral pin. All cases contradict , proving the theorem.
Verification and scope
The new finite algebra consists of six factored extremum identities, the explicit nonagon middle-entry check, and the three moment arguments. A separate author checked all identities, including a bounded symbolic check of the six table entries. The author checked the reflection patterns, range comparisons, nonagon inequalities, and final reduction; the argument is author-recorded. The author also checked the extension lemmas and the radius-palette lemmas with the final reduction; both audits passed without gaps.
This establishes an exact finite bound for three circular exceptions. It does not extract a large circular subset from arbitrary planar sets, and does not settle the unrestricted first assertion or asymptotic question.