Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Linear rarity from regular cores and a majority on a circle


The unrestricted questions in Problem 132 remain unresolved. The results below concern substantial additional families; they do not extract a regular or circular core from arbitrary sets. All multiplicities count unordered pairs. The arguments were checked by the author and are author-recorded; no novelty claim is made.

The later cosine-incidence argument proves an asymptotic linear bound from any fixed positive fraction of concyclic points, without requiring a regular core or a majority. The quantitative regular-core proof below remains independently valid.

Results

Dense regular-core theorem. Fix C≥1C\ge1. Suppose an nn-point planar set AA contains m>k/2m>k/2 vertices of a regular kk-gon, and

n≤Cm.n\le Cm.

For all sufficiently large kk, depending only on CC,

R(A)≥k/4.(1)R(A)\ge k/4. \tag{1}

In particular, containing a regular polygon of any fixed positive fraction of the total cardinality forces linearly many rare distances. The core need not account for almost all points.

Circular-majority theorem. Fix 0<ε≤1/20<\varepsilon\le1/2. Suppose

m≥(1/2+ε)nm\ge(1/2+\varepsilon)n

points of AA lie on one circle. For all sufficiently large nn, depending only on ε\varepsilon,

R(A)≥2m−n6.(2)R(A)\ge\frac{2m-n}{6}. \tag{2}

Unlike the one-off-circle argument, this allows a positive fraction of arbitrary off-circle points. The original proof used Kneser's addition theorem; the elementary small-difference lemma below replaces that input. The review of the third independent report also gives the fully explicit bound

R(A)≥h−n2−10n6/7(A)R(A)\ge h-\frac n2-10n^{6/7} \tag{A}

when a circle contains hh points. For a fixed circular majority this is asymptotically weaker than the later circle theorem, which gives (h−1)/2−O(n2/3)(h-1)/2-O(n^{2/3}) with a uniform constant for h≥n/2h\ge n/2. Its value here is its explicit constant and elementary, self-contained proof, not a larger scope or a better circle-concentration threshold.

A cosine-grid intersection bound

For k≥3k\ge3, put

h=2πk,Ek=12(1+(2k)2/3).h=\frac{2\pi}{k},\qquad E_k=12\bigl(1+(2k)^{2/3}\bigr).

Consider the two sets

U={a−bcos⁡(jh+α):j∈Z/kZ},U′={a′−b′cos⁡(jh+α′):j∈Z/kZ},U=\{a-b\cos(jh+\alpha):j\in\mathbb Z/k\mathbb Z\}, \quad U'=\{a'-b'\cos(jh+\alpha'):j\in\mathbb Z/k\mathbb Z\},

where b,b′>0b,b'>0 and (a,b)≠(a′,b′)(a,b)\ne(a',b'). Then

∣U∩U′∣≤Ek.(3)|U\cap U'|\le E_k. \tag{3}

Fold the angular grids into [0,π][0,\pi]. Each folded grid is contained in two translates of hZh\mathbb Z. Equality of values at folded angles x,yx,y is equivalent to

y=f(x)=arccos⁡(A+Bcos⁡x),A=a′−ab′,B=bb′>0.y=f(x)=\arccos(A+B\cos x),\qquad A=\frac{a'-a}{b'},\quad B=\frac b{b'}>0.

Its domain is an interval. On the nondegenerate interior the function is strictly increasing, and the sign of f′′(x)f''(x) is the sign of

−ABcos⁡2x+(1−A2−B2)cos⁡x−AB.-AB\cos^2x+(1-A^2-B^2)\cos x-AB.

This polynomial is identically zero only for A=0,B=1A=0,B=1, excluded by the parameter hypothesis. It has at most two roots in the domain. Thus the graph splits into at most three strictly convex or strictly concave pieces. Domain endpoints can be included in adjacent pieces; an empty or singleton domain causes no difficulty.

Fix one piece and one of the four pairs of translated grids. After scaling both coordinates by k/(2π)k/(2\pi), the coincidence points lie in a translate of Z2\mathbb Z^2, increase strictly in both coordinates, and have total Manhattan span at most kk. If there are qq such points, their s=q−1s=q-1 consecutive gap vectors are positive integral vectors with distinct slopes, hence distinct vectors. At most s/2s/2 positive integral vectors have Manhattan norm at most s\sqrt s, since their number is at most

⌊s⌋(⌊s⌋−1)2≤s/2.\frac{\lfloor\sqrt s\rfloor(\lfloor\sqrt s\rfloor-1)}2\le s/2.

Consequently k≥s3/2/2k\ge s^{3/2}/2, giving

q≤1+(2k)2/3.q\le1+(2k)^{2/3}.

Summing over the three pieces and four grid pairs proves (3). This supplies the same bound used in the earlier fixed-ring argument, now with its proof included for the present application.

Few distance values force few dihedral orbits

Normalize the regular kk-gon VV to the unit circle centered at zero, and let B⊆A∩VB\subseteq A\cap V, with ∣B∣=m|B|=m. Write q=∣D(A)∣q=|D(A)| for the number of positive distances and q0=q+1q_0=q+1, allowing zero when working with squared distances.

Let HH be the number of orbits of the dihedral group DkD_k meeting A∖{0}A\setminus\{0\}. Choose a representative pi=ρieiϕip_i=\rho_i e^{i\phi_i} from each occupied orbit. Its full pinned spectrum to VV is

Ti={1+ρi2−2ρicos⁡(jh−ϕi):j∈Z/kZ}.T_i=\{1+\rho_i^2-2\rho_i\cos(jh-\phi_i):j\in\mathbb Z/k\mathbb Z\}.

Use the actual pinned subsets

Ui={∣pi−b∣2:b∈B}⊆Ti.U_i=\{|p_i-b|^2:b\in B\}\subseteq T_i.

Since ρi>0\rho_i>0, a given value has at most two preimages on the circle. Hence

m/2≤∣Ui∣≤m.m/2\le |U_i|\le m.

Every UiU_i lies in the q0q_0 nonnegative squared distances of AA. For different representatives,

∣Ui∩Uj∣≤Ek.(4)|U_i\cap U_j|\le E_k. \tag{4}

Indeed, if ρi≠ρj\rho_i\ne\rho_j, their parameter pairs (1+ρi2,2ρi)(1+\rho_i^2,2\rho_i) differ, so (3) applies to Ti,TjT_i,T_j. If the radii agree, even one common value would imply ϕi≡±ϕj(mod2π/k)\phi_i\equiv\pm\phi_j\pmod{2\pi/k}, contradicting the choice of different DkD_k-orbits. Their full spectra are then disjoint.

If d(s)d(s) counts the sets UiU_i containing a squared value ss, Cauchy--Schwarz and (4) give

H2m24≤(∑sd(s))2≤q0∑sd(s)2≤q0(Hm+H2Ek).\frac{H^2m^2}{4} \le\left(\sum_s d(s)\right)^2 \le q_0\sum_s d(s)^2 \le q_0(Hm+H^2E_k).

Thus

H(m2−4q0Ek)≤4q0m.(5)H(m^2-4q_0E_k)\le4q_0m. \tag{5}

Notice that BB need not be invariant under DkD_k. Only the full spectra TiT_i are used for overlap control; the actual UiU_i are used to count values occurring in AA.

Chords occurring only on the core circle

The occupied dihedral orbits are contained in at most 2H2H concentric regular kk-gons: each dihedral orbit is the union of at most two rotation orbits. These auxiliary polygons may contain additional points not in AA; this enlargement is used only to bound possible distance values.

Let S⊆D(B)2S\subseteq D(B)^2 be any collection of squared chord values that occur in BB. An unordered pair of auxiliary polygons, including a polygon paired with itself, has squared-distance spectrum

{ri2+rj2−2rirjcos⁡(jh+η):j∈Z/kZ}.\{r_i^2+r_j^2-2r_ir_j\cos(jh+\eta):j\in\mathbb Z/k\mathbb Z\}.

Unless both radii are one, its parameter pair differs from (2,2)(2,2). By (3), it contains at most EkE_k values of SS, since SS is contained in the full unit-polygon chord spectrum. There are at most H(2H+1)H(2H+1) unordered polygon pairs. If the center belongs to AA, pairs involving it supply at most HH further values, one per occupied radius.

After excluding these values, every remaining value in SS occurs only between points of AA on the unit circle. Its distance graph has maximum degree at most two, so it has at most nn unordered edges. Therefore

R(A)≥∣S∣−H(2H+1)Ek−H.(6)R(A)\ge |S|-H(2H+1)E_k-H. \tag{6}

Proof of the dense regular-core theorem

There are fewer than n/2n/2 rich distances, by the total pair count. Thus R(A)>q−n/2R(A)>q-n/2. If

q≥n/2+k/4,q\ge n/2+k/4,

then (1) follows. Otherwise, using n≤Cmn\le Cm and k<2mk<2m,

q0<n/2+k/4+1≤(C+1)m.q_0<n/2+k/4+1\le(C+1)m.

Since Ek=O(k2/3)=o(m)E_k=O(k^{2/3})=o(m), for all sufficiently large kk we have Ek≤m/[8(C+1)]E_k\le m/[8(C+1)]. Equation (5) then implies

H≤8q0/m≤8(C+1).H\le8q_0/m\le8(C+1).

Every chord length of VV occurs in BB. Indeed, deleting t=k−m<k/2t=k-m<k/2 vertices removes at most 2t<k2t<k edges from a nondiametral class, which originally had kk edges. When kk is even, deletion removes at most t<k/2t<k/2 edges from its diametral class, which originally had k/2k/2 edges. Hence in (6) we may take ∣S∣=⌊k/2⌋|S|=\lfloor k/2\rfloor.

Putting H0=⌈8(C+1)⌉H_0=\lceil8(C+1)\rceil now gives

R(A)≥⌊k/2⌋−H0(2H0+1)Ek−H0≥k/4R(A)\ge\lfloor k/2\rfloor-H_0(2H_0+1)E_k-H_0\ge k/4

for sufficiently large kk. An explicit, very loose sufficient threshold is

k≥[512H0(2H0+1)]3.k\ge\left[512H_0(2H_0+1)\right]^3.

To check it, use Ek≤32k2/3E_k\le32k^{2/3}. The threshold guarantees the condition in (5), bounds the EkE_k term by k/16k/16, and bounds H0+1H_0+1 by k/8k/8, including the floor loss.

More generally, if BB has mm vertices in a regular kk-gon, k≤Dmk\le Dm, and n≤Cmn\le Cm, with fixed C,DC,D, then

R(A)≥m/4R(A)\ge m/4

for sufficiently large mm. Split instead at q=n/2+m/4q=n/2+m/4. Equation (5) again bounds HH; in (6) take the actual chord spectrum of BB, which has at least (m−1)/2(m-1)/2 values by pinning one point. This does not require density greater than one half.

An elementary small-difference lemma

Lemma. Let SS be a finite nonempty subset of an abelian group, with a=∣S∣a=|S| and b=∣S−S∣<2a−1b=|S-S|<2a-1. After translating SS to contain zero, there is a finite subgroup H≤⟨S⟩H\le\langle S\rangle, of order MM, such that, if SS meets kk cosets of HH, then

M≥2a−b,b=(2k−1)M,kM−a<M/2.(B)M\ge2a-b,\qquad b=(2k-1)M,\qquad kM-a<M/2. \tag{B}

Moreover S−SS-S is a union of complete HH-cosets.

Write G=⟨S⟩G=\langle S\rangle. If S−S=GS-S=G, take H=GH=G: then GG is finite, k=1k=1, and all conclusions follow from a≤b<2a−1a\le b<2a-1. Otherwise minimize

f(X)=∣X+S∣−∣X∣f(X)=|X+S|-|X|

over nonempty finite X⊆GX\subseteq G with X+S≠GX+S\ne G. The minimum κ\kappa exists, since f(X)f(X) is a nonnegative integer, and X=−SX=-S gives κ≤b−a<a−1\kappa\le b-a<a-1. Choose a minimizer UU of least size, translated so that 0∈U0\in U.

We first justify applying submodularity to intersecting translates U,VU,V of this minimizer. If GG is infinite, their union is admissible because it is finite. If GG is finite, set E=G∖(U+S)E=G\setminus(U+S). The minimum expansion for −S-S equals κ\kappa by reflection, while

E−S⊆G∖U,∣E−S∣−∣E∣≤κ.E-S\subseteq G\setminus U,\qquad |E-S|-|E|\le\kappa.

Thus EE is a minimizer for −S-S, and −E-E is one for SS. Minimality of ∣U∣|U| gives ∣E∣≥∣U∣|E|\ge|U|, hence ∣G∣≥2∣U∣+κ|G|\ge2|U|+\kappa. If (U+S)∪(V+S)=G(U+S)\cup(V+S)=G, their intersection would have size at most κ\kappa, but it contains x+Sx+S for any x∈U∩Vx\in U\cap V, of size a>κa>\kappa. This is impossible. So U∪VU\cup V is admissible in the finite case as well.

The inclusions for sumsets of intersections and unions imply

f(U∩V)+f(U∪V)≤f(U)+f(V)=2κ.f(U\cap V)+f(U\cup V)\le f(U)+f(V)=2\kappa.

Both terms on the left are at least κ\kappa. The intersection is therefore a minimizer, and least cardinality forces U=VU=V. For every u∈Uu\in U, the sets UU and U+uU+u intersect at uu, so U+u=UU+u=U. Consequently UU is a finite subgroup HH.

Let M=∣H∣M=|H| and let kk count the occupied cosets. Then κ=(k−1)M\kappa=(k-1)M, and u=kM−au=kM-a satisfies

u<M,2a−b≤a−κ=M−u≤M.u<M,\qquad 2a-b\le a-\kappa=M-u\le M.

Here k≥2k\ge2: otherwise S⊆HS\subseteq H, so G=HG=H and H+S=GH+S=G, contrary to admissibility. Any two distinct occupied fibers have total size at least 2M−u>M2M-u>M. Their differences fill the corresponding coset of HH. At least one fiber has more than M/2M/2 points, so its self-difference fills HH too. Hence S−SS-S is a union of HH-cosets. Finally

b≥a+κ=(2k−1)M−u>(2k−2)M,b<2a≤2kM.b\ge a+\kappa=(2k-1)M-u>(2k-2)M, \qquad b<2a\le2kM.

Divisibility by MM forces b=(2k−1)Mb=(2k-1)M, and b<2ab<2a now gives u<M/2u<M/2. This proves (B). The finite-group admissibility step and the distinction between k=1k=1 and k≥2k\ge2 are essential.

From a circular majority to a dense regular core

Write b=R(A)≥1b=R(A)\ge1. Counting at least n+1n+1 pairs per rich class and at least one per rare class gives

(n2)≥(q−b)(n+1)+b,q≤n2+b−1+1−bn+1≤n2+b−1.(7)\binom n2\ge(q-b)(n+1)+b, \quad q\le\frac n2+b-1+\frac{1-b}{n+1}\le\frac n2+b-1. \tag{7}

Represent the mm points on the given circle by their angular coordinates B⊂R/ZB\subset\mathbb R/\mathbb Z. The two oriented angular differences corresponding to a chord are negatives of one another, so for d=∣B−B∣d=|B-B|,

d≤2q+1≤n+2b−1.(8)d\le2q+1\le n+2b-1. \tag{8}

Put δ=2m−n≥2εn\delta=2m-n\ge2\varepsilon n, and suppose, toward a contradiction, that b<δ/6b<\delta/6. Then (8) gives d<2m−1d<2m-1. Apply (B) to obtain a finite subgroup GG, of order gg, with BB meeting jj cosets and

d=(2j−1)g,g≥2m−d.(9)d=(2j-1)g, \qquad g\ge2m-d. \tag{9}

This replaces the original use of Kneser's theorem in precisely the small-difference regime needed here; no general sumset theorem is claimed. Equations (8)--(9) imply

d<2m,g≥2m−d≥δ−2b+1>2δ/3≥4εn/3.d<2m,\qquad g\ge2m-d\ge\delta-2b+1>2\delta/3\ge4\varepsilon n/3.

Moreover m>d/2≥(j−1/2)gm>d/2\ge(j-1/2)g. Since each occupied coset has at most gg points, every occupied coset must contain more than g/2g/2 points; otherwise their total would be at most (j−1/2)g(j-1/2)g.

A finite subgroup of R/Z\mathbb R/\mathbb Z of order gg is {0,1/g,…,(g−1)/g}\{0,1/g,\ldots,(g-1)/g\}. Choose one occupied coset. Its corresponding points form a subset of more than half the vertices of a regular gg-gon. If it contains ss points, then

s>g/2>2εn/3,n<32εs.s>g/2>2\varepsilon n/3, \qquad n<\frac{3}{2\varepsilon}s.

The dense regular-core theorem applies uniformly as n→∞n\to\infty, because g≥4εn/3g\ge4\varepsilon n/3. It gives

b≥g/4>δ/6,b\ge g/4>\delta/6,

the required contradiction. This proves (2).

Explicit transfer from shifted angular grids

Here is a checked proof of (A), rather than reliance on the independent report's unavailable companion files. Let B=A∩CB=A\cap C, ∣B∣=h|B|=h, and normalize CC to the unit circle. Taking every point of AA on CC can only strengthen (A). Suppose the angular set S⊂R/ZS\subset\mathbb R/\mathbb Z meets kk cosets of the subgroup of order MM, and S−SS-S meets ll such cosets. Define

J(M)=27M2/3+17,F=klJ(M).J(M)=27M^{2/3}+17,\qquad F=klJ(M).

Every off-circle, noncentral point pp has at most FF neighbors in BB whose distances to pp occur within BB. To check the constant, write p=ρeiϕp=\rho e^{i\phi}, with ρ>0\rho>0, ρ≠1\rho\ne1. For a source coset and a difference coset, the incidence equation is

cos⁡y=c+ρcos⁡x,c=(1−ρ2)/2.\cos y=c+\rho\cos x,\qquad c=(1-\rho^2)/2.

Fold the source angle relative to ϕ\phi into x∈[0,π]x\in[0,\pi], keeping the two semicircle branches separate. Each branch is contained in one translated grid of step 2π/M2\pi/M. Take the principal difference angle y∈[0,π]y\in[0,\pi]. Because S−SS-S is symmetric, its principal representatives still belong to its ll cosets; each target coset is contained in one grid of the same step.

On its nonsingleton domain, an interval in [0,π][0,\pi], f(x)=arccos⁡(c+ρcos⁡x)f(x)=\arccos(c+\rho\cos x) is strictly increasing. The sign of f′′f'' in the interior is the sign of

(1−c2−ρ2)cos⁡x−cρ(1+cos⁡2x).(1-c^2-\rho^2)\cos x-c\rho(1+\cos^2x).

This polynomial is not identically zero, since that would force c=0,ρ=1c=0,\rho=1. There are at most two zeros, giving at most three strictly convex or strictly concave pieces. On each piece, scale both axes by M/(2π)M/(2\pi). The coincidence points lie in a translate of Z2\mathbb Z^2, strictly increase in both coordinates, and have total Manhattan span at most MM. The distinct-gap argument proving (3) therefore bounds their number by 1+(2M)2/31+(2M)^{2/3}. The two source branches and three pieces give at most

6(1+(2M)2/3)≤J(M)6\bigl(1+(2M)^{2/3}\bigr)\le J(M)

incidences per coset pair. Endpoints may be included in adjacent pieces, only overcounting; a singleton domain gives at most two source vertices. Keeping folded branches separate also handles two vertices with the same folded angle. Summing proves the bound FF.

Put t=n−ht=n-h. Every chord class in BB has at most hh unordered pairs, and BB determines at least ⌊h/2⌋\lfloor h/2\rfloor distances. Discard the circumradius class if necessary, to avoid incidences from the center. The other old classes receive at most tF+(t2)tF+\binom t2 new pairs in total. Each that becomes rich must receive at least t+1t+1 new pairs. Thus

R(A)≥⌊h2⌋−1−tF+(t2)t+1≥h−n2−F−1.(C)R(A)\ge\left\lfloor\frac h2\right\rfloor-1 -\frac{tF+\binom t2}{t+1} \ge h-\frac n2-F-1. \tag{C}

For the second inequality when t≥1t\ge1, use ⌊h/2⌋≥(h−1)/2\lfloor h/2\rfloor\ge(h-1)/2 and (t2)/(t+1)≤(t−1)/2\binom t2/(t+1)\le(t-1)/2. If t=0t=0, (C) follows directly from R(A)≥⌊h/2⌋R(A)\ge\lfloor h/2\rfloor.

Now write s=R(A)s=R(A) and y=h−n/2−sy=h-n/2-s. Pair counting as in (7) gives

b:=∣S−S∣≤2q(A)+1≤n+2s=2h−2y.b:=|S-S|\le2q(A)+1\le n+2s=2h-2y.

If y>1/2y>1/2, (B) applies and supplies M≥2yM\ge2y, l=b/M=2k−1l=b/M=2k-1, and k≤lk\le l. Also b<2nb<2n. Since J(M)≤44M2/3J(M)\le44M^{2/3}, we obtain

F≤44(b/M)2M2/3≤176n2(2y)4/3.F\le44(b/M)^2M^{2/3} \le\frac{176n^2}{(2y)^{4/3}}.

By (C), y≤F+1y\le F+1. For y≥2y\ge2, it follows that

y7/3≤35224/3n2<107/3n2.y^{7/3}\le\frac{352}{2^{4/3}}n^2<10^{7/3}n^2.

The case y<2y<2 is immediate, proving (A).

The same transfer also verifies the report's regular-polygon bound. If mm points belong to a regular MM-gon, increase mm to the actual number of such points if necessary; proving (D) for the larger mm suffices. Let BB consist of these mm vertices. A point on the polygon's circumcircle but not a vertex has no distances to its vertices in the polygon's chord palette: equality would force its angle onto the same grid. For all other noncentral points the preceding bound applies with k=l=1k=l=1 and F=J(M)F=J(M). The pair budget gives

R(A)≥m−n2−27M2/3−18.(D)R(A)\ge m-\frac n2-27M^{2/3}-18. \tag{D}

The center exception and the strict richness cost t+1t+1 must not be omitted. Neither (C) nor (D) is a transfer principle for an arbitrary convex subset. The author checked (B), the folded-grid incidence proof, the pair budget, and the numerical constants; the argument is author-recorded.

The remaining unrestricted gap

The layer reduction forces a hypothetical bounded-RR sequence to have a positive fraction in finitely many outer convex layers. It does not make such a layer circular, regular, or a dense subset of a regular polygon. Neither (1) nor (2) fills that structural gap. No configuration refuting either unrestricted assertion, and no proof of either assertion, has been obtained.