Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Linear rarity from regular cores and a majority on a circle
The unrestricted questions in Problem 132 remain unresolved. The results below concern substantial additional families; they do not extract a regular or circular core from arbitrary sets. All multiplicities count unordered pairs. The arguments were checked by the author and are author-recorded; no novelty claim is made.
The later cosine-incidence argument proves an asymptotic linear bound from any fixed positive fraction of concyclic points, without requiring a regular core or a majority. The quantitative regular-core proof below remains independently valid.
Results
Dense regular-core theorem. Fix . Suppose an -point planar set contains vertices of a regular -gon, and
For all sufficiently large , depending only on ,
In particular, containing a regular polygon of any fixed positive fraction of the total cardinality forces linearly many rare distances. The core need not account for almost all points.
Circular-majority theorem. Fix . Suppose
points of lie on one circle. For all sufficiently large , depending only on ,
Unlike the one-off-circle argument, this allows a positive fraction of arbitrary off-circle points. The original proof used Kneser's addition theorem; the elementary small-difference lemma below replaces that input. The review of the third independent report also gives the fully explicit bound
when a circle contains points. For a fixed circular majority this is asymptotically weaker than the later circle theorem, which gives with a uniform constant for . Its value here is its explicit constant and elementary, self-contained proof, not a larger scope or a better circle-concentration threshold.
A cosine-grid intersection bound
For , put
Consider the two sets
where and . Then
Fold the angular grids into . Each folded grid is contained in two translates of . Equality of values at folded angles is equivalent to
Its domain is an interval. On the nondegenerate interior the function is strictly increasing, and the sign of is the sign of
This polynomial is identically zero only for , excluded by the parameter hypothesis. It has at most two roots in the domain. Thus the graph splits into at most three strictly convex or strictly concave pieces. Domain endpoints can be included in adjacent pieces; an empty or singleton domain causes no difficulty.
Fix one piece and one of the four pairs of translated grids. After scaling both coordinates by , the coincidence points lie in a translate of , increase strictly in both coordinates, and have total Manhattan span at most . If there are such points, their consecutive gap vectors are positive integral vectors with distinct slopes, hence distinct vectors. At most positive integral vectors have Manhattan norm at most , since their number is at most
Consequently , giving
Summing over the three pieces and four grid pairs proves (3). This supplies the same bound used in the earlier fixed-ring argument, now with its proof included for the present application.
Few distance values force few dihedral orbits
Normalize the regular -gon to the unit circle centered at zero, and let , with . Write for the number of positive distances and , allowing zero when working with squared distances.
Let be the number of orbits of the dihedral group meeting . Choose a representative from each occupied orbit. Its full pinned spectrum to is
Use the actual pinned subsets
Since , a given value has at most two preimages on the circle. Hence
Every lies in the nonnegative squared distances of . For different representatives,
Indeed, if , their parameter pairs differ, so (3) applies to . If the radii agree, even one common value would imply , contradicting the choice of different -orbits. Their full spectra are then disjoint.
If counts the sets containing a squared value , Cauchy--Schwarz and (4) give
Thus
Notice that need not be invariant under . Only the full spectra are used for overlap control; the actual are used to count values occurring in .
Chords occurring only on the core circle
The occupied dihedral orbits are contained in at most concentric regular -gons: each dihedral orbit is the union of at most two rotation orbits. These auxiliary polygons may contain additional points not in ; this enlargement is used only to bound possible distance values.
Let be any collection of squared chord values that occur in . An unordered pair of auxiliary polygons, including a polygon paired with itself, has squared-distance spectrum
Unless both radii are one, its parameter pair differs from . By (3), it contains at most values of , since is contained in the full unit-polygon chord spectrum. There are at most unordered polygon pairs. If the center belongs to , pairs involving it supply at most further values, one per occupied radius.
After excluding these values, every remaining value in occurs only between points of on the unit circle. Its distance graph has maximum degree at most two, so it has at most unordered edges. Therefore
Proof of the dense regular-core theorem
There are fewer than rich distances, by the total pair count. Thus . If
then (1) follows. Otherwise, using and ,
Since , for all sufficiently large we have . Equation (5) then implies
Every chord length of occurs in . Indeed, deleting vertices removes at most edges from a nondiametral class, which originally had edges. When is even, deletion removes at most edges from its diametral class, which originally had edges. Hence in (6) we may take .
Putting now gives
for sufficiently large . An explicit, very loose sufficient threshold is
To check it, use . The threshold guarantees the condition in (5), bounds the term by , and bounds by , including the floor loss.
More generally, if has vertices in a regular -gon, , and , with fixed , then
for sufficiently large . Split instead at . Equation (5) again bounds ; in (6) take the actual chord spectrum of , which has at least values by pinning one point. This does not require density greater than one half.
An elementary small-difference lemma
Lemma. Let be a finite nonempty subset of an abelian group, with and . After translating to contain zero, there is a finite subgroup , of order , such that, if meets cosets of , then
Moreover is a union of complete -cosets.
Write . If , take : then is finite, , and all conclusions follow from . Otherwise minimize
over nonempty finite with . The minimum exists, since is a nonnegative integer, and gives . Choose a minimizer of least size, translated so that .
We first justify applying submodularity to intersecting translates of this minimizer. If is infinite, their union is admissible because it is finite. If is finite, set . The minimum expansion for equals by reflection, while
Thus is a minimizer for , and is one for . Minimality of gives , hence . If , their intersection would have size at most , but it contains for any , of size . This is impossible. So is admissible in the finite case as well.
The inclusions for sumsets of intersections and unions imply
Both terms on the left are at least . The intersection is therefore a minimizer, and least cardinality forces . For every , the sets and intersect at , so . Consequently is a finite subgroup .
Let and let count the occupied cosets. Then , and satisfies
Here : otherwise , so and , contrary to admissibility. Any two distinct occupied fibers have total size at least . Their differences fill the corresponding coset of . At least one fiber has more than points, so its self-difference fills too. Hence is a union of -cosets. Finally
Divisibility by forces , and now gives . This proves (B). The finite-group admissibility step and the distinction between and are essential.
From a circular majority to a dense regular core
Write . Counting at least pairs per rich class and at least one per rare class gives
Represent the points on the given circle by their angular coordinates . The two oriented angular differences corresponding to a chord are negatives of one another, so for ,
Put , and suppose, toward a contradiction, that . Then (8) gives . Apply (B) to obtain a finite subgroup , of order , with meeting cosets and
This replaces the original use of Kneser's theorem in precisely the small-difference regime needed here; no general sumset theorem is claimed. Equations (8)--(9) imply
Moreover . Since each occupied coset has at most points, every occupied coset must contain more than points; otherwise their total would be at most .
A finite subgroup of of order is . Choose one occupied coset. Its corresponding points form a subset of more than half the vertices of a regular -gon. If it contains points, then
The dense regular-core theorem applies uniformly as , because . It gives
the required contradiction. This proves (2).
Explicit transfer from shifted angular grids
Here is a checked proof of (A), rather than reliance on the independent report's unavailable companion files. Let , , and normalize to the unit circle. Taking every point of on can only strengthen (A). Suppose the angular set meets cosets of the subgroup of order , and meets such cosets. Define
Every off-circle, noncentral point has at most neighbors in whose distances to occur within . To check the constant, write , with , . For a source coset and a difference coset, the incidence equation is
Fold the source angle relative to into , keeping the two semicircle branches separate. Each branch is contained in one translated grid of step . Take the principal difference angle . Because is symmetric, its principal representatives still belong to its cosets; each target coset is contained in one grid of the same step.
On its nonsingleton domain, an interval in , is strictly increasing. The sign of in the interior is the sign of
This polynomial is not identically zero, since that would force . There are at most two zeros, giving at most three strictly convex or strictly concave pieces. On each piece, scale both axes by . The coincidence points lie in a translate of , strictly increase in both coordinates, and have total Manhattan span at most . The distinct-gap argument proving (3) therefore bounds their number by . The two source branches and three pieces give at most
incidences per coset pair. Endpoints may be included in adjacent pieces, only overcounting; a singleton domain gives at most two source vertices. Keeping folded branches separate also handles two vertices with the same folded angle. Summing proves the bound .
Put . Every chord class in has at most unordered pairs, and determines at least distances. Discard the circumradius class if necessary, to avoid incidences from the center. The other old classes receive at most new pairs in total. Each that becomes rich must receive at least new pairs. Thus
For the second inequality when , use and . If , (C) follows directly from .
Now write and . Pair counting as in (7) gives
If , (B) applies and supplies , , and . Also . Since , we obtain
By (C), . For , it follows that
The case is immediate, proving (A).
The same transfer also verifies the report's regular-polygon bound. If points belong to a regular -gon, increase to the actual number of such points if necessary; proving (D) for the larger suffices. Let consist of these vertices. A point on the polygon's circumcircle but not a vertex has no distances to its vertices in the polygon's chord palette: equality would force its angle onto the same grid. For all other noncentral points the preceding bound applies with and . The pair budget gives
The center exception and the strict richness cost must not be omitted. Neither (C) nor (D) is a transfer principle for an arbitrary convex subset. The author checked (B), the folded-grid incidence proof, the pair budget, and the numerical constants; the argument is author-recorded.
The remaining unrestricted gap
The layer reduction forces a hypothetical bounded- sequence to have a positive fraction in finitely many outer convex layers. It does not make such a layer circular, regular, or a dense subset of a regular polygon. Neither (1) nor (2) fills that structural gap. No configuration refuting either unrestricted assertion, and no proof of either assertion, has been obtained.