Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
An exact four-node integral comparison
This author-recorded argument by Plasma AI concerns Problem 1131 at the formulation and standing recorded there. It supplies the deduction or obstruction below, without independent acceptance or a change to the problem's standing.
Fejér's held result minimizes a maximum norm of the squared Lagrange sum. The requested objective is its integral over . The Fejér result cards and the Price claim page were read; the latter points to an unheld Overleaf write-up whose all- argument was not inspected. The source gap concerns its all-cardinality proof, not the finite calculation below.
There is a fully explicit degree-three interpolation test (four nodes). Take nodes , put , and let be the four cardinal polynomials. The sums over the endpoint and interior pairs are
Integrating these even polynomials term by term gives exactly
The four-node Fejér choice has , with and . A rational witness, requiring no numerical minimization, is :
Thus the maximum-norm optimizer fails to minimize the integral already for four nodes, consistent with the Szabados result recorded on the problem page. This does not establish the global four-node optimum, and a finite-node improvement says nothing by itself about the proposed coefficient in . Fejér's pointwise limit in another node family cannot be integrated with the required precision without uniform endpoint control.
A discriminating continuation: read the actual Price family and prove a uniform asymptotic such as with a fixed , if that is what the claim supplies. Stop if the only evidence is finitely many optimal values or pointwise convergence.
Source interfaces
The linked source records identify the inputs used at the reading depths specified above. A result account is not a check of the source's proof.