Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 599

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 599, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let GG be a (possibly infinite) graph and A,BA,B be disjoint independent sets of vertices. Must there exist a family PP of disjoint paths between AA and BB and a set SS which contains exactly one vertex from each path in PP, and such that every path between AA and BB contains at least one vertex from SS?

Status. Proved. The site's commentary credits Aharoni and Berger, and the frontmatter standing is derived from the accepted claim page Aharoni and Berger's infinite Menger theorem, accepted on its refereed publication and the site's credit.

Source. erdosproblems.com/599, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #599, https://www.erdosproblems.com/599.

References.

  • [AhBe09] Aharoni, Ron and Berger, Eli, Menger's theorem for infinite graphs. arXiv:math/0509397v4 (3 December 2007); Invent. Math. 176 (2009), 1--62, DOI 10.1007/s00222-008-0157-3.

Formalization. The formal-conjectures file, read at the commit linked, contains statement-only declarations for the exact problem and a stronger variant. Both have sorry bodies and no formal_proof attribute, so the file is a statement record and is not linked as a formalization.

Current assessment

The recorded resolution applies Aharoni--Berger's stronger directed theorem to the undirected question by the bidirected-edge transfer below. The inspected material covers the statement and conventions in arXiv v4; the paper's proof is not rewritten here, and the journal version was not compared with those bytes. No current-status search or independent review of that full proof is recorded here.

Claims. The settling result is Aharoni and Berger's theorem (arXiv 2005, Inventiones Mathematicae 2009), refereed and credited by the site's curator; the claim page records the directed statement and the bidirected-edge transfer to the undirected question. No other claim on the problem is recorded: on 2026-10-07 the site's thread showed no comments and its proof-claims page no claims, and the formal-conjectures file holds statements only.

Progress

Aharoni--Berger's Theorem 1.6 proves a stronger directed result. For arbitrary vertex sets A,BA,B in a possibly infinite digraph, there are a family P\mathcal P of disjoint AA--BB paths and an AA--BB separator SS obtained by choosing precisely one vertex from every path in P\mathcal P.

Their conventions make the comparison exact. Definition 1.3 says that every AA--BB path meets an AA--BB separator. Notation 1.4 and Section 2.4 use "disjoint" for vertex-disjoint paths. Section 2.3 defines an AA--BB path to be finite and simple, beginning in AA and ending in BB; singleton paths are allowed.

Replace each undirected edge of GG by both orientations. Traversing an undirected finite simple path from its AA endpoint to its BB endpoint gives a directed AA--BB path, and forgetting orientations gives the reverse correspondence. Both operations preserve vertex sets, pairwise vertex disjointness, and whether a separator meets every path. Since the problem assumes A∩B=∅A\cap B=\varnothing, no singleton AA--BB path occurs. Independence of AA and BB is unnecessary for the theorem. Thus Theorem 1.6 implies the exact assertion in Problem 599.

Known Results

  • Aharoni--Berger, Theorem 1.6. The directed theorem above, together with the checked definitions and the bidirected-edge transfer, proves Problem 599. The inspected artifact is the 53-page arXiv:math/0509397v4 final-submission version dated 3 December 2007, on pp. 1--2 and 5--6. The separate journal record is Inventiones Mathematicae 176 (2009), 1--62, published online 5 December 2008. The Version of Record was not compared with the arXiv bytes.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.