Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 1027

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 1027, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let c>0c>0, and let nn be sufficiently large depending on cc. Suppose that F\mathcal{F} is a family of at most c2nc2^n many finite sets of size nn. Let X=∪A∈FAX=\cup_{A\in \mathcal{F}}A.

Must there exist ≫c2∣X∣\gg_c 2^{\lvert X\rvert} many sets B⊂XB\subset X which intersect every set in F\mathcal{F}, yet contain none of them?

Status. Proved. The site marks the problem proved (page last edited 1 October 2025) and credits a proof posted in its comment thread by Koishi Chan on 21 September 2025; the claim page Koishi Chan 2025 records the result, accepted on the curator's credit.

Source. erdosproblems.com/1027, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1027, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1027.

References.

Formalization. The site records a formal-conjectures statement, not a proof. At its pinned commit, the file FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1027.lean is marked solved and names as its formal proof the lean-proofs development linked from the claim page, which the corpus has not built.

Current assessment

The site's formulation asks whether, for c>0c>0 fixed and nn large, every family F\mathcal F of at most c2nc2^n sets of size nn has ≫c2∣X∣\gg_c 2^{\lvert X\rvert} subsets BB of its union XX that meet every member and contain none. The answer is yes: [[problems/set_systems/E1027/claims/2025_09_21_koishichan|Koishi Chan's comment of 21 September 2025]] gives a random greedy partial coloring whose completions are counted by a martingale, with Beck's theorem on property B finishing the last Oc(1)O_c(1) vertices, and the site's curator credits it; the problem's standing derives from that accepted claim. The proof is a forum comment, amended on 24 September 2025 after a remark by Stijn Cambie on the normalization of the edge weights, and is not refereed. One such BB alone is a proper two-coloring of F\mathcal F, that is, property B, the subject of Problem 901; the question here is the counting form.

Search scope, 2026-10-07: the site's page and discussion thread, the community database (teorth/erdosproblems), the formal-conjectures catalog and the lean-proofs catalog. No other claim on the problem was found. The claim page links one third-party Lean proof, which the corpus has not built, so no formalized evidence is listed.