Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 1023
claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 1023, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let be the maximal size of a family of subsets of such that no set in this family is the union of other members of the family. Is it true that there is a constant such that
Formulation. The printed source [Er71, item 18] states the unpublished Erdős–Kleitman bounds and the conjectured asymptotic both with the exponent in place of ; the site prints and reads the printed exponent as a misprint, since the middle layer alone gives . With the exponent the conjecture is false; the Statement carries the site's exponent .
Status. The site labels the problem SOLVED (LEAN) and credits Hunter's observation in its thread that the solution of Problem 447 settles it: the answer is yes, , so .
Source. erdosproblems.com/1023, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1023, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1023.
References.
- [Er71] Erdős, P., Some unsolved problems in graph theory and combinatorial analysis. Combinatorial Mathematics and its Applications (Proc. Conf., Oxford, 1969) (1971), 97-109.
- [Kl71] Kleitman, Daniel, Collections of subsets containing no two sets and their union. Proceedings of the LA Meeting AMS (1971), 153-155.
Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures, marked solved there as of its commit of 18 September 2026 and pointing at a third-party Lean proof, linked from the claim page, which this corpus has not built.
Current assessment
The question is whether , the largest size of a family of subsets of with no member the union of other members, is asymptotic to a constant times . It is answered yes. The middle layer gives , and such a family is union-free in the sense of Problem 447, so Kleitman's theorem [Kl71] gives ; hence . The accepted claim is Hunter's deduction from Kleitman's theorem, whose page records the argument, the curator's acceptance and the third-party Lean file that formalizes Kleitman's proof and the deduction; the site's Lean qualification is that file, which the corpus has not built. Erdős and Kleitman's unpublished bounds , which the site records from [Er71], are the historical state of the problem and have no page: they were never published, and the corrected form of their conjecture is the claim above. The printed statement is on the card Erdős 1971. As of 2026-10-06 the site's thread held five comments and the site listed no proof claim; the community database has recorded the problem as solved (Lean) since 2026-02-10.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.