Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 747

../

claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 747, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. How large should ℓ(n)\ell(n) be such that, almost surely, a random 33-uniform hypergraph on 3n3n vertices with ℓ(n)\ell(n) edges must contain nn vertex-disjoint edges?

Formulation. The question is read as asking for the threshold up to a factor 1+o(1)1+o(1). Erdős poses it in [Er81] after recalling the Erdős–Rényi theorem that (1+ε)nlog⁡n(1+\varepsilon)n\log n edges almost surely give a random graph on 2n2n vertices a perfect matching, which is best possible; the site's commentary credits Kahn with the precise asymptotic; and the formal-conjectures statement erdos_747 asks for (1±ε)nlog⁡n(1\pm\varepsilon)n\log n. Johansson, Kahn and Vu's abstract calls their order-of-magnitude threshold a solution of Shamir's problem; under this reading it is a partial answer.

Status. Solved: the site labels the problem SOLVED, records that Shamir asked it of Erdős in 1979, so that it is known as Shamir's problem, and that Erdős saw no way to guess the answer, and credits Johansson, Kahn and Vu [JKV08] with the threshold ℓ(n)≍nlog⁡n\ell(n)\asymp n\log n and Kahn [Ka23] with the asymptotic ℓ(n)∼nlog⁡n\ell(n)\sim n\log n, for rr-uniform hypergraphs in general.

Source. erdosproblems.com/747, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #747, https://www.erdosproblems.com/747.

References.

  • [Er81] Erdős, P., On the combinatorial problems which I would most like to see solved. Combinatorica 1 (1981), 25–42.
  • [JKV08] Johansson, Anders and Kahn, Jeff and Vu, Van, [[../library/set_systems/johansson_2008_factors_random_graphs/_index|Factors in random graphs]]. Random Structures Algorithms 33 (2008), no. 1, 1-28.
  • [Ka23] Kahn, Jeff, [[../library/set_systems/kahn_2023_asymptotics_shamir_s_problem/_index|Asymptotics for Shamir's problem]]. Adv. Math. 422 (2023), Paper No. 109019, 39 pp.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures, added 2026-10-07: erdos_747, marked research solved with the threshold nlog⁡nn\log n as its answer and the proof left as sorry, with no formal_proof attribute; the community database lists the problem as formalized. No Lean proof is recorded.

Current assessment

The question, in the site's formulation, asks how many edges a random 33-uniform hypergraph on 3n3n vertices needs before it almost surely contains nn vertex-disjoint edges, a perfect matching. The standing is solved, answered, through Kahn's result. Corollary 2.6 of Johansson, Kahn and Vu's threshold of order n log n places the threshold at ℓ(n)≍nlog⁡n\ell(n)\asymp n\log n, matching the isolated-vertex lower bound up to a constant; Theorem 1 of Kahn's asymptotic for Shamir's problem shows that (1+ε)(N/r)log⁡N(1+\varepsilon)(N/r)\log N edges suffice for a perfect matching of the random rr-uniform hypergraph on NN vertices, so ℓ(n)∼nlog⁡n\ell(n)\sim n\log n and isolated vertices are asymptotically the only obstruction. The library cards (card, card) record the statements, and the corpus holds no review of either proof. The hitting-time form, that the random hypergraph process acquires a perfect matching when its last isolated vertex disappears, is stated in Kahn's paper as a consequence of a conditional strengthening of Theorem 1, proved in J. Kahn, Hitting times for Shamir's problem, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 375 (2022), no. 1, 627–668, and lies beyond the question. The formal-conjectures statement file records the answer with its proof left as sorry; no Lean proof is recorded.

Search scope, 2026-10-07: the site's problem page, discussion thread and proof-claims page, the community database entry, the formal-conjectures problem listing, the arXiv and Crossref records of both papers, and the library cards.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.