Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 163

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 163, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. For any d≥1d\geq 1 if HH is a graph such that every subgraph contains a vertex of degree at most dd then R(H)≪dnR(H)\ll_d n.

Formulation. The site's wording as of 2026-09-18T10:39Z (page last edited 22 January 2026). Here n=∣V(H)∣n=|V(H)|, R(H)R(H) is the least NN such that every red-blue coloring of the edges of KNK_N contains a monochromatic copy of HH, and "R(H)≪dnR(H)\ll_dn" means R(H)≤c(d) nR(H)\le c(d)\,n with c(d)c(d) depending only on dd. A graph in which every subgraph has a vertex of degree at most dd is dd-degenerate. The conjecture was stated by Burr and Erdős in 1975 for sets of graphs of bounded arboricity, adding that it "could equally well have been stated" for the edge density max⁡F⊆Ge(F)/∣V(F)∣\max_{F\subseteq G}e(F)/|V(F)|; their Lemma 3.3 places the degeneracy σ(G)=max⁡F⊆Gδ(F)\sigma(G)=\max_{F\subseteq G}\delta(F) between the edge density ρ(G)\rho(G) and 2ρ(G)2\rho(G), so the site's three forms (a union of cc forests, average degree at most dd in every subgraph, and degeneracy at most dd) are one conjecture up to the constant.

Status. Proved. The status-defining source is Theorem 1.1 of Lee, Ramsey numbers of degenerate graphs, Ann. of Math. (2) 185 (2017), 791--829 (refereed; cited from the arXiv v2 of 1 December 2016): there is an absolute constant cc such that for all dd, rr and n≥2d22crn\ge2^{d^22^{cr}}, in every two-coloring of a complete graph on at least 2d2crn2^{d2^{cr}}n vertices one color contains every dd-degenerate rr-colorable graph on at most nn vertices, so every dd-degenerate HH of chromatic number rr with ∣V(H)∣≥2d22cr|V(H)|\ge2^{d^22^{cr}} has R(H)≤2d2cr∣V(H)∣R(H)\le2^{d2^{cr}}|V(H)|. The paper's remark after the theorem settles the conjecture "since all dd-degenerate graphs have chromatic number at most d+1d+1" (p. 3); the one-line bridge to the site's wording is written in the Current assessment and named there as authored. The site credits Lee with the solution; the constant is not settled (the site records the conjecture R(H)≤2O(d)nR(H)\le2^{O(d)}n). The claim page Lee 2015 records the result, its postings and the acceptance evidence.

Source. erdosproblems.com/163, accessed 2026-09-18: the problem page (PROVED, with the site's note that it has been solved in the affirmative; last edited 22 January 2026; source keys [BuEr75], [Er82e]; commentary citing [Le17]; "Formalised statement? Yes"), its two-comment discussion thread and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #163, https://www.erdosproblems.com/163, accessed 2026-09-18.

References.

  • [Le17] Lee, Choongbum, Ramsey numbers of degenerate graphs. Ann. of Math. (2) 185 (2017), no. 3, 791--829, doi:10.4007/annals.2017.185.3.2 (Crossref record read: issue dated 1 May 2017); arXiv:1505.04773 (v2, 1 December 2016, the version cited; 35 pages; the arXiv listing carries no journal reference). Theorem 1.1 and the remarks after it, p. 3; Theorem 1.3 and the hypercube remark, p. 4; Section 7, p. 32. Library home: lee_2017_ramsey_numbers_degenerate_graphs.
  • [BuEr75] Burr, S. A. and Erdős, P., On the magnitude of generalized Ramsey numbers for graphs. Infinite and finite sets (Colloq., Keszthely, 1973), Vol. I, Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 10, North-Holland (1975), 215--240. The site's text prints no venue. The Definition and Conjecture, p. 216; σ(G)\sigma(G) and Lemma 3.3, p. 220; Section 7, pp. 238--239. Library home: burr_1975_magnitude_generalized_ramsey_numbers_graphs (the Rényi archive scan).
  • [Er82e] Erdős, Paul, Some of my favourite problems which recently have been solved. Proceedings of the International Mathematical Conference, Singapore 1981, North-Holland Math. Stud. 74 (1982), 59--79. Display (1), p. 78. Library home: erdos_1982_my_favourite_problems_which_recently_have (a scan).

Formalization. A statement file that links a third-party proof. The file ErdosProblems/163.lean of formal-conjectures, at the commit linked, declares erdos_163 : answer(True) ↔ ∀ (d : ℕ), 1 ≤ d → ∃ C > (0 : ℝ), ∀ (V : Type) [Fintype V] (H : SimpleGraph V), H.IsDegenerate d → (SimpleGraph.diagonalGraphRamsey H : ℝ) ≤ C * Fintype.card V under category research solved, with proof sorry; its docstring cites [BuEr75] and [Le17]. Since 19 September 2026 the file has carried a formal_proof attribute linking the file Erdos163.lean of Boris Alexeev's repository lean-proofs, which declares itself a formalization of Lee's solution and is recorded as a formalization link on Lee's claim page. The corpus has not built either file. The community database (teorth/erdosproblems) records the problem proved (13 September 2025), the statement formalized since 9 September 2026 and the formal status unformalized; the site's indicator reads "Formalised statement? Yes" (it read "No").

Current assessment

The question. The statement above; PROVED; last edited 22 January 2026; source keys [BuEr75] and [Er82e]. The commentary names the problem the Burr--Erdős conjecture, gives its two equivalent forms (a union of cc forests has R(H)≪cnR(H)\ll_cn; a graph whose every subgraph has average degree at most dd has R(H)≪dnR(H)\ll_dn), credits Lee [Le17] with the solution and the bounds R(H)≤22O(d)nR(H)\le2^{2^{O(d)}}n and, more precisely, R(H)≤2d2O(χ(H))nR(H)\le2^{d2^{O(\chi(H))}}n, records the conjecture R(H)≤2O(d)nR(H)\le2^{O(d)}n, places the problem as #9 in the Ramsey theory section of the graphs problem collection and points to Problem 800. The thread has two comments (24 August 2025, the expectation that the true bound is exp⁡(O(d))n\exp(O(d))n with the chromatic-number form of Lee's bound; 21 January 2026, a reference-key typo since fixed on the site) and the proof-claim tab is empty. The community database record says proved (13 September 2025), formalized statement.

Origin. [BuEr75], cited from the Rényi archive scan. The Definition and Conjecture (p. 216): a set of graphs is an LL-set if r(Gi)≤c⋅p(Gi)r(G_i)\le c\cdot p(G_i) for a constant cc, pp the number of points; "Conjecture. Any set of graphs or pairs or [sic] graphs having bounded arboricity is an LL-set" (the second "or" is printed for "of"); "The conjecture could equally well have been stated" for the edge density ρ(G)=max⁡F⊆Gq(F)/p(F)\rho(G)=\max_{F\subseteq G}q(F)/p(F). Page 220 defines σ(G)=max⁡F⊆Gδ(F)\sigma(G)=\max_{F\subseteq G}\delta(F), "In [9], a graph with σ(G)=k\sigma(G)=k is called kk-degenerate", and Lemma 3.3 gives ρ(G)<σ(G)≤2ρ(G)\rho(G)<\sigma(G)\le2\rho(G) for graphs with an edge, which is the paper's own bridge from its arboricity form to the site's degeneracy form. Section 7 (p. 238) records that the conjecture "remains unsettled" with a prize offered for settling it. [Er82e] (printed p. 78), the second "last minute" problem: for a graph G(n)G(n) whose every kk-vertex subgraph has fewer than ckck edges, "Burr and I conjectured several years ago that then (1) r^(G(n))<f(c)n\hat r(G(n))<f(c)n [sic]. In other words the ordinary diagonal Ramsey number of G(n)G(n) is less than CnCn where CC depends only on cc." (the hat in display (1) is a misprint the next sentence corrects; the size-Ramsey strengthening (2) that follows is Problem 559's passage). Erdős's 1981 survey states the same conjecture as its display (16), "if G(n)G(n) has edge density <C<C, then r(G(n),G(n))<f(C)⋅nr(G(n),G(n))<f(C)\cdot n", on the card of erdos_1981_new_problems_results_graph_theory_other (not a site key here).

Status support. Theorem 1.1 of [Le17], p. 3 of the arXiv v2, checked clause by clause: "There exists a constant cc such that the following holds for every natural number dd, rr, and nn satisfying n≥2d22crn\ge2^{d^22^{cr}}. For every edge two-coloring of the complete graph on at least 2d2crn2^{d2^{cr}}n vertices, one of the colors is universal for the family of dd-degenerate rr-colorable graphs on at most nn vertices." Applied with n=∣V(H)∣n=|V(H)| this is the abstract's R(H)≤2d2cr∣V(H)∣R(H)\le2^{d2^{cr}}|V(H)| for every dd-degenerate HH of chromatic number rr with ∣V(H)∣≥2d22cr|V(H)|\ge2^{d^22^{cr}}; the site's "R(H)≤2d2O(χ(H))nR(H)\le2^{d2^{O(\chi(H))}}n" is this bound and its "R(H)≤22O(d)nR(H)\le2^{2^{O(d)}}n" is the case r=d+1r=d+1. The bridge to the site's wording, following the paper's remark and written here as an authored deduction: a dd-degenerate graph is (d+1)(d+1)-colorable (color the vertices in the reverse of a degeneracy order; each vertex has at most dd earlier neighbors), so Theorem 1.1 with r=d+1r=d+1 gives R(H)≤2d2c(d+1)nR(H)\le2^{d2^{c(d+1)}}n for every dd-degenerate HH on n≥n0(d)=2d22c(d+1)n\ge n_0(d)=2^{d^22^{c(d+1)}} vertices; the dd-degenerate graphs on fewer than n0(d)n_0(d) vertices are finitely many up to isomorphism and each has a finite Ramsey number, so c(d)=max⁡(2d2c(d+1),max⁡∣V(H)∣<n0(d)R(H)/∣V(H)∣)c(d)=\max\bigl(2^{d2^{c(d+1)}},\max_{|V(H)|<n_0(d)}R(H)/|V(H)|\bigr) gives R(H)≤c(d) nR(H)\le c(d)\,n for all dd-degenerate HH, which is R(H)≪dnR(H)\ll_dn. The theorem's threshold n≥2d22crn\ge2^{d^22^{cr}} is part of its hypothesis. Acceptance evidence: the Annals is refereed; the Crossref record places the article in volume 185, issue 3, 1 May 2017; the version cited is the arXiv v2 and the journal text was not compared. Read depth: claims checked for Theorem 1.1 and the two remarks after it (p. 3), Theorem 1.3 with the hypercube remark (p. 4) and Section 7's "Related problems" (p. 32); no proof was read.

The constant (open, not the problem's question). Theorem 1.1's bound is doubly exponential in dd, 2d2c(d+1)n2^{d2^{c(d+1)}}n; the site records the conjecture R(H)≤2O(d)nR(H)\le2^{O(d)}n, and the paper's optimality remark (p. 3) shows only that for fixed rr the exponent d2crd2^{cr} is best possible up to the constant (a random graph of density 1/21/2 on (1−ε)2dn(1-\varepsilon)2^dn vertices and its complement both miss Kd,n−dK_{d,n-d}). The history the paper records (p. 2, on its card): Kostochka--Rödl, Kostochka--Sudakov and Fox--Sudakov had reached R(H)≤2cdlog⁡nnR(H)\le2^{c_d\sqrt{\log n}}n; the Section 7 "Related problems" (p. 32) note that graphs with (1+ε)nlog⁡n(1+\varepsilon)n\log n edges have superlinear Ramsey numbers while some graphs with cnlog⁡ncn\log n edges have linear ones (Burr and Erdős), and name the hypercubes as "an interesting test case", Problem 181. The site's "See also [800]" is [[problems/ramsey_theory/E0800/_index|Problem 800]] (subdivided graphs, Alon 1994), assessed on its own page.

Search scope. None of the routes below found a dispute of Theorem 1.1, a retraction, or a second proof; the constant's gap is the only open item.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; the community database record; the formal-conjectures statement file.
  • arXiv: the API record of 1505.04773 (v1 18 May 2015, v2 1 December 2016; no journal reference); the API search abs:Burr AND abs:degenerate AND abs:Ramsey (five records: Lee's paper; a 2008 note "Two remarks on the Burr-Erdős conjecture"; a 2015 paper on embedding degenerate graphs of small bandwidth; a 2021 paper on covering colored digraphs; a 2025 preprint on Ramsey numbers of 1-degenerate 3-graphs; none disputes or sharpens the theorem).
  • Crossref: the bibliographic query identifying [Le17]'s record (10.4007/annals.2017.185.3.2).
  • Semantic Scholar: the citation list of [Le17] (53 records, scanned by title; the 2024--2026 items concern canonical, ordered, zero-sum and multicolor variants, hypergraph and digraph analogs, and Tikhomirov's hypercube paper; none concerns the constant for degenerate graphs).
  • The Rényi archive: the bibliography index and the file 1975-26 for [BuEr75].
  • The primary sources: [Le17] pp. 1, 3, 4 and 32; [BuEr75] pp. 215, 216, 220, 238 and 239; [Er82e] p. 78.

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X. Not held: the Annals text of [Le17] (the arXiv v2 is cited); p. 240 of [BuEr75] (the scan ends at p. 239).

Remaining gaps. (1) Proof coverage is statements only: Theorem 1.1 is paged at claims checked and its proof (dependent random choice with a random greedy embedding, Sections 3--6) was not read or reviewed here; the authored bridge above is elementary and was checked here. (2) The constant c(d)c(d) is open between the conjectured 2O(d)2^{O(d)} and Lee's 2d2O(d)2^{d2^{O(d)}}; it is not the site's question, whose status is proved. (3) The Annals text was not compared with the arXiv v2 cited. (4) The formal-conjectures statement file links a third-party Lean proof that this corpus has not built.

Known results

  • Lee, Theorem 1.1 (2017, refereed): one color of every two-coloring of KNK_N, N≥2d2crnN\ge2^{d2^{cr}}n, contains every dd-degenerate rr-colorable graph on at most nn vertices once n≥2d22crn\ge2^{d^22^{cr}}; with r=d+1r=d+1 the status-defining result.
  • Burr--Erdős, Conjecture (1975): the origin, in the arboricity and edge-density forms; the degeneracy form is the paper's σ\sigma of p. 220.
  • Erdős 1982, display (1), p. 78: the conjecture restated as open (the card of erdos_1982_my_favourite_problems_which_recently_have).

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.