Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 454

../


Statement. Let

f(n)=min⁡i<n(pn+i+pn−i),f(n) = \min_{i<n} (p_{n+i}+p_{n-i}),

where pkp_k is the kkth prime. Is it true that

lim sup⁡n(f(n)−2pn)=∞?\limsup_n (f(n)-2p_n)=\infty?

Formulation. The minimum is taken over 1≤i<n1\le i<n. Pomerance [Po79] defines the same quantity over 0<i<n0<i<n and proves f(n)>2pnf(n)>2p_n for infinitely many nn, so the lim sup⁡\limsup is at least 22, as the site's commentary records; McNew's quantity (23) and the formal-conjectures statement also take 1≤i<n1\le i<n. Admitting i=0i=0 would give f(n)≤2pnf(n)\le 2p_n for every nn and the trivial answer no, so the site's min⁡i<n\min_{i<n} is read as the sources read it.

Status. Open.

Source. erdosproblems.com/454, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #454, https://www.erdosproblems.com/454.

References.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures, at the linked commit of 18 September 2026, which defines f n as the infimum over 0<i<n0<i<n and carries no formal_proof annotation; its variant two_le_limsup, the Pomerance bound, is marked research solved with a sorry proof.

Progress

Not yet compiled.

Known Results

Not yet compiled.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.