Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 522

../

claims/: The 5 claim pages of Problem 522, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let f(z)=∑0≤k≤nϵkzkf(z)=\sum_{0\leq k\leq n} \epsilon_k z^k be a random polynomial, where ϵk∈{−1,1}\epsilon_k\in \{-1,1\} independently uniformly at random for 0≤k≤n0\leq k\leq n.

Is it true that, if RnR_n is the number of roots of f(z)f(z) in ${ z\in \mathbb{C} : \lvert z\rvert \leq 1}$, then

Rnn/2→1\frac{R_n}{n/2}\to 1

almost surely?

Status. OPEN (LEAN) (the site's label, OPEN (LEAN), 2026-10-06; page last edited 06 December 2025). The community database recorded a Lean formalization of a claimed proof on 2026-09-26 (pull request 448 of teorth/erdosproblems, merged that day), which sets the formal status to Lean and leaves the informal status open until a human reader has digested the proof, and the site derives its label from it, so a machine-checked proof is recorded and no human review has accepted it; the site's remarks cite Yakir's in-probability result [Ya21] as the progress. The derived standing is claimed/proved: five pending full claims, none accepted, assert that Rn/(n/2)→1R_n/(n/2)\to1 almost surely for {−1,1}\{-1,1\} coefficients. They are the notes on Chojecki 2026 and Kwon–Zou 2026, posted on the thread in April 2026, the Lean proof credited to Colin Snyder of Star Fleet Math and hosted in the lean-proofs repository on 2026-07-23 (Snyder 2026), and the two Lean-backed claims of September 2026, Kawada 2026 (the formalization the database recorded, with a Zenodo preprint and the one claim on the site's proof-claims tab) and Kitamura 2026 (a Lean proof of both coefficient readings, linked by formal-conjectures). None is refereed, independently reviewed, or built or audited here.

Source. erdosproblems.com/522, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #522, https://www.erdosproblems.com/522.

References.

  • [EO56] Erdős, Paul and Offord, A. C., On the number of real roots of a random algebraic equation. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) (1956), 139-160.
  • [Er61] Erdős, Paul, Some unsolved problems. Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl. (1961), 221-254.
  • [Ha67] Hayman, W. K., Research problems in function theory. (1967), vii+56.
  • [Ya21] Yakir, Oren, Approximately half of the roots of a random Littlewood polynomial are inside the disk. Studia Math. (2021), 227-240.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures (pinned at the file's last change, 2026-09-29), where erdos_522 and its {0,1} variant have been tagged research solved since 2026-09-28 (pull request 6608), linking Kitamura's Lean proof of both statements and, since 2026-09-29, two revisions of Kawada's repository; the catalog links, it does not referee. The two developments are recorded at their pinned revisions on the Kitamura and Kawada claim pages. Nothing was built or fidelity-audited here.

Current assessment

The question, as the site states it, asks whether the number RnR_n of roots of the degree-nn partial polynomial in the closed unit disk satisfies Rn/(n/2)→1R_n/(n/2)\to1 almost surely, for one infinite sequence of independent uniform signs; the site records the same ambiguity between {−1,1}\{-1,1\} and {0,1}\{0,1\} coefficients as for Problem 521, and the thread's reading of [Er61, p. 252] is that Erdős asked for the strong law, with the in-probability form as a separate weaker question. Yakir [Ya21] proved the weaker form, Rn=n/2+O(n9/10)R_n=n/2+O(n^{9/10}) with probability tending to one. The strong law is claimed five times. Four routes share Jensen's formula and differ afterwards: Chojecki's note (April 2026, AI-generated, revised after a reader found an error) through the Nazarov–Nishry–Sodin logarithmic integrability theorem and a central-limit argument for angle averages, with a power saving; Kwon and Zou's note (April 2026, AI-assisted) through a fourth-moment estimate for logarithmic integrals, with the rate n7/8+δn^{7/8+\delta}; Kawada's preprint (September 2026) through concentration at fixed degrees along the subsequence j8j^8 and Rouché's theorem in between, giving an almost-sure radial law for disks of radius 1+x/n1+x/n and the rate O(n/log⁡n)O(n/\log n), all stated to be formalized in Lean; and Kitamura's Lean development (September 2026, AI-assisted), with an AI-generated proof outline in its README and no manuscript, which proves the catalog's statements for both coefficient readings and so also settles the {0,1}\{0,1\} reading. The fifth is a Lean development credited to Colin Snyder of Star Fleet Math, hosted in the lean-proofs repository on 2026-07-23 with no write-up and announced nowhere on the site, whose final theorem is derived from a moment bound for radial cosine sums and whose route this wiki does not trace beyond its section names. Letwin announced on the thread in April 2026 a more general paper that would imply the problem, and mentioned a separate paper of Michelen and Yakir; neither has appeared. No claim has been checked by a named reader on the thread beyond the aborted check of Chojecki's first note, no refereed version exists, and this wiki has not checked any of the proofs.

Search scope: the site's problem page as exported (last edited 06 December 2025), its discussion thread (25 comments) and proof-claims tab (both read 2026-10-07), the community database entry (open, formal status Lean, 2026-09-26), the formal-conjectures file and the two pull requests that tagged it, the GitHub repositories and notes linked from the thread, the lean-proofs repository's index, and arXiv author searches for Letwin, Michelen and Yakir (no paper on this problem); no OpenAI release item names this problem. MathSciNet and zbMATH were not searched and X was not used.

Known Results

  • [Ya21]: Rn/(n/2)→1R_n/(n/2)\to1 in probability, more precisely P(∣Rn−n/2∣≥n9/10)→0\mathbb{P}(\lvert R_n-n/2\rvert\ge n^{9/10})\to0; the weaker question Erdős also asked, which also appears in Hayman's collection [Ha67].
  • Claimed, not accepted: Rn/(n/2)→1R_n/(n/2)\to1 almost surely for {−1,1}\{-1,1\} coefficients, on Chojecki 2026 (with Rn=n/2+Oω(n399/400)R_n=n/2+O_\omega(n^{399/400})), Kwon–Zou 2026 (with Rn=n/2+O(n7/8+δ)R_n=n/2+O(n^{7/8+\delta})), Snyder 2026 (a Lean proof hosted on 2026-07-23, credited to Colin Snyder of Star Fleet Math, with no write-up), Kawada 2026 (with the radial law νn(1+x/n)/n→12(1+coth⁡x−1/x)\nu_n(1+x/n)/n\to\frac12(1+\coth x-1/x) uniformly on compact sets, the rate O(n/log⁡n)O(n/\log n), and the same laws for Steinhaus, Gaussian and bounded symmetric coefficients, formalized in Lean) and Kitamura 2026 (a Lean proof, which also proves the {0,1}\{0,1\} reading).
  • Earlier postings: the site's remarks and the thread record no other result on the almost-sure question before April 2026.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.