Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. The answer to Problem 230 is no, with a power saving in the relative error. Theorem 4 of Bombieri and Bourgain states that for every and every there is a polynomial with frequencies in and coefficients of modulus one such that, uniformly in ,
where Remark 5 says the may be replaced by a power of ; Theorem 7 makes the construction effective, with the same conclusion as Theorem 4 (error ) and coefficients given by elementary expressions in Legendre and Jacobi symbols, and Remark 8 refines the effective version's to , short of the power of available for Theorem 4. The relative error tends to zero, so for every and every large the maximum of on the circle is below , which refutes the constant asked for in Problem 230. The paper's polynomial has coefficients where the site's has ; replacing by changes the ratio by , and a shift of the index range changes nothing on the circle. The result sharpens Kahane's relative error on the accepted Kahane page and is the quantitative resolution the site's commentary names. The card bombieri_2009_kahane_ultraflat_polynomials digests the statements (printed pp. 628--630), the construction through a smoothed quadratic-phase core, a partition of unity on an auxiliary scale, a blockwise Bernoulli construction and the Körner correction, and the derandomization through modified Jacobi-symbol sequences with Weil and Deligne bounds. The coefficients remain general points of the unit circle: the auxiliary signs select randomizing choices and do not become the coefficients, so the paper does not touch the real-sign question of Problem 1150, as the card explains.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki: the construction is self-contained in the paper.
Acceptance. A refereed sharpening of Kahane's disproof, named by the site's curator. Refereed: E. Bombieri and J. Bourgain, On Kahane's ultraflat polynomials, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 11 (2009), no. 3, 627--703, received 3 September 2008, published 30 June 2009. Reviewed: the site's curator, Thomas Bloom, names the paper in the problem's commentary as the sharpening of Kahane's construction to a polynomial within of on the whole circle (page last edited 23 January 2026). The card digests the paper; its arguments are not independently rederived. No formalization of this result is known here.