Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 115
claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 115, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. If is a polynomial of degree such that ${z : \lvert p(z)\rvert\leq 1}$ is connected then is it true that
Statement (corrected). If is a polynomial of degree such that is connected then is it true that
Notes. The site's wording puts no normalization on . The change writes , so that is monic; nothing else changes. The evidence is Erdős's own statement of the problem. [Er61], Problem IV.1, p. 246 (Some unsolved problems), opens "Let be a polynomial of degree " and asks on p. 247 whether when is connected, his (IV.1.1). Hayman's collection states the question as Problem 4.8, one of five problems on the set , the first of which, Problem 4.7, takes (Research Problems in Function Theory, the 2018 edition, which keeps the 1967 numbering), and Eremenko and Lempert state it from there with as , their (1) on p. 191. The site's own commentary fits only monic polynomials: it says the maximum is at least , with equality only for , and for with the maximum is . The defect is the site's; Erdős's text carries the normalization. The form comes from [Er61], not from the hypotheses of the theorem that settles it. No result about the site's wording is recorded.
Formulation. Erdős asked for the exact bound in place of [Er61, p. 247, (IV.1.1)], with a strict inequality, and added that (IV.1.1), if true, is best possible, as the -th Chebyshev polynomial shows. That question has the answer no for every : Eremenko and Lempert's extremal polynomial is monic, has its critical values at , so that its set is connected, and has and [ErLe94, pp. 191--192]. The site records that Szabados observed that the bound without the term is too strong; Eremenko and Lempert report that a later survey of Erdős noted that the bound must be replaced by , and Hayman's Update 4.8 records Eremenko's remark that the bound fails for Chebyshev's polynomials. The site states the problem with the term, and that question, made monic, sets the standing.
Status. Proved. The site's label is PROVED (LEAN), a label that describes the corrected Statement; its Lean marker refers to a formal proof by others, linked from the claim page, unbuilt and unaudited in this corpus. The corrected Statement is proved: Eremenko and Lempert [ErLe94] prove the sharp bound , attained by a shifted Chebyshev polynomial, refereed in the Proceedings of the AMS and credited by the site, which the corpus accepts on the claim page Eremenko and Lempert 1994.
Source. erdosproblems.com/115, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #115, https://www.erdosproblems.com/115.
References.
- [Er61] Erdős, Paul, Some unsolved problems. Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl. 6 (1961), 221–254; Problem IV.1, pp. 246–247, which opens "Let be a polynomial of degree " and poses (IV.1.1), over a connected .
- [ErLe94] Erëmenko, A. and Lempert, L., An extremal problem for polynomials. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (1994), 191-193.
- [Po59a] Pommerenke, Ch., On the derivative of a polynomial. Michigan Math. J. (1959), 373-375.
Formalization. Statement in
formal-conjectures,
marked solved there with a link to a Lean proof in the lean-proofs
repository, which the claim page records at its pinned commit; this corpus
has built and audited neither.
Current assessment
The corrected Statement asks whether a monic polynomial of degree with connected set has on ; the Notes give the evidence for the normalization, and the formal-conjectures statement also takes monic. The answer is yes: Eremenko and Lempert [ErLe94] prove , with equality only for rotations and translates of , so the constant is exact and the term, which Szabados observed to be necessary, is , about , since . The lower bound is trivial, attained only by , and the connectedness hypothesis cannot be dropped, as shows; Pommerenke [Po59a] had the bound . The accepted claim page carries the acceptance (refereed, credited by the site) and records a Lean proof of the sharp bound by others. Proof coverage: the library card records Theorem 1 and its sharpness and does not verify the proof, so the paper's proof is unverified in this corpus, and the Lean development is unbuilt and unaudited.
Search scope: the site's problem page, the community database entry
(proved with a Lean marker as of its last update), the formal-conjectures
statement and the linked lean-proofs file at its pinned commit, and the
library card
Eremenko and Lempert 1994;
no forum proof claim and no OpenAI release item names this problem. No wider
literature search was made, none being needed for a refereed answer the site
credits.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.