Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 115

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 115, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. If p(z)p(z) is a polynomial of degree nn such that ${z : \lvert p(z)\rvert\leq 1}$ is connected then is it true that

max⁡z∈C∣p(z)∣≤1∣p′(z)∣≤(12+o(1))n2?\max_{\substack{z\in\mathbb{C}\\ \lvert p(z)\rvert\leq 1}} \lvert p'(z)\rvert \leq (\tfrac{1}{2}+o(1))n^2?

Statement (corrected). If p(z)=zn+…p(z)=z^n+\ldots is a polynomial of degree nn such that {z:∣p(z)∣≤1}\{z : \lvert p(z)\rvert\leq 1\} is connected then is it true that

max⁡z∈C∣p(z)∣≤1∣p′(z)∣≤(12+o(1))n2?\max_{\substack{z\in\mathbb{C}\\ \lvert p(z)\rvert\leq 1}} \lvert p'(z)\rvert \leq (\tfrac{1}{2}+o(1))n^2?

Notes. The site's wording puts no normalization on pp. The change writes p(z)=zn+…p(z)=z^n+\ldots, so that pp is monic; nothing else changes. The evidence is Erdős's own statement of the problem. [Er61], Problem IV.1, p. 246 (Some unsolved problems), opens "Let zn+…z^n+\ldots be a polynomial of degree nn" and asks on p. 247 whether max⁡z∈Ef(n)∣f′(z)∣<n22\max_{z\in E_f^{(n)}}\lvert f'(z)\rvert<\frac{n^2}{2} when Ef(n)E_f^{(n)} is connected, his (IV.1.1). Hayman's collection states the question as Problem 4.8, one of five problems on the set Ef(n)E_f^{(n)}, the first of which, Problem 4.7, takes f(z)=zn+a1zn−1+…+anf(z)=z^n+a_1z^{n-1}+\ldots+a_n (Research Problems in Function Theory, the 2018 edition, which keeps the 1967 numbering), and Eremenko and Lempert state it from there with f(z)∼znf(z)\sim z^n as z→∞z\to\infty, their (1) on p. 191. The site's own commentary fits only monic polynomials: it says the maximum is at least nn, with equality only for p(z)=znp(z)=z^n, and for czncz^n with ∣c∣<1\lvert c\rvert<1 the maximum is n∣c∣1/n<nn\lvert c\rvert^{1/n}<n. The defect is the site's; Erdős's text carries the normalization. The form comes from [Er61], not from the hypotheses of the theorem that settles it. No result about the site's wording is recorded.

Formulation. Erdős asked for the exact bound n2/2n^2/2 in place of (12+o(1))n2(\tfrac12+o(1))n^2 [Er61, p. 247, (IV.1.1)], with a strict inequality, and added that (IV.1.1), if true, is best possible, as the nn-th Chebyshev polynomial shows. That question has the answer no for every nn: Eremenko and Lempert's extremal polynomial fn(z)=Tn(2(1−n)/nz+1)f_n(z)=T_n(2^{(1-n)/n}z+1) is monic, has its critical values at ±1\pm1, so that its set EfnE_{f_n} is connected, and has fn(0)=1f_n(0)=1 and fn′(0)=21/n−1n2>n2/2f_n'(0)=2^{1/n-1}n^2>n^2/2 [ErLe94, pp. 191--192]. The site records that Szabados observed that the bound without the o(1)o(1) term is too strong; Eremenko and Lempert report that a later survey of Erdős noted that the bound must be replaced by 12{1+o(1)}n2\tfrac12\{1+o(1)\}n^2, and Hayman's Update 4.8 records Eremenko's remark that the bound 12n2\tfrac12n^2 fails for Chebyshev's polynomials. The site states the problem with the o(1)o(1) term, and that question, made monic, sets the standing.

Status. Proved. The site's label is PROVED (LEAN), a label that describes the corrected Statement; its Lean marker refers to a formal proof by others, linked from the claim page, unbuilt and unaudited in this corpus. The corrected Statement is proved: Eremenko and Lempert [ErLe94] prove the sharp bound 21/n−1n22^{1/n-1}n^2, attained by a shifted Chebyshev polynomial, refereed in the Proceedings of the AMS and credited by the site, which the corpus accepts on the claim page Eremenko and Lempert 1994.

Source. erdosproblems.com/115, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #115, https://www.erdosproblems.com/115.

References.

  • [Er61] Erdős, Paul, Some unsolved problems. Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl. 6 (1961), 221–254; Problem IV.1, pp. 246–247, which opens "Let zn+…z^n+\ldots be a polynomial of degree nn" and poses (IV.1.1), max⁡∣f′(z)∣<n2/2\max\lvert f'(z)\rvert<n^2/2 over a connected EfE_f.
  • [ErLe94] Erëmenko, A. and Lempert, L., An extremal problem for polynomials. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (1994), 191-193.
  • [Po59a] Pommerenke, Ch., On the derivative of a polynomial. Michigan Math. J. (1959), 373-375.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures, marked solved there with a link to a Lean proof in the lean-proofs repository, which the claim page records at its pinned commit; this corpus has built and audited neither.

Current assessment

The corrected Statement asks whether a monic polynomial of degree nn with connected set Ep={∣p(z)∣≤1}E_p=\{\lvert p(z)\rvert\le1\} has ∣p′∣≤(12+o(1))n2\lvert p'\rvert\le(\tfrac12+o(1))n^2 on EpE_p; the Notes give the evidence for the normalization, and the formal-conjectures statement also takes pp monic. The answer is yes: Eremenko and Lempert [ErLe94] prove max⁡Ep∣p′∣≤21/n−1n2\max_{E_p}\lvert p'\rvert\le2^{1/n-1}n^2, with equality only for rotations and translates of Tn(2(1−n)/nz+1)T_n(2^{(1-n)/n}z+1), so the constant 12\tfrac12 is exact and the o(1)o(1) term, which Szabados observed to be necessary, is (21/n−1)/2(2^{1/n}-1)/2, about (log⁡2)/(2n)(\log2)/(2n), since 21/n−1n2=(12+12(21/n−1))n22^{1/n-1}n^2=(\tfrac12+\tfrac12(2^{1/n}-1))n^2. The lower bound nn is trivial, attained only by znz^n, and the connectedness hypothesis cannot be dropped, as z2+10z+1z^2+10z+1 shows; Pommerenke [Po59a] had the bound e2n2\tfrac e2n^2. The accepted claim page carries the acceptance (refereed, credited by the site) and records a Lean proof of the sharp bound by others. Proof coverage: the library card records Theorem 1 and its sharpness and does not verify the proof, so the paper's proof is unverified in this corpus, and the Lean development is unbuilt and unaudited.

Search scope: the site's problem page, the community database entry (proved with a Lean marker as of its last update), the formal-conjectures statement and the linked lean-proofs file at its pinned commit, and the library card Eremenko and Lempert 1994; no forum proof claim and no OpenAI release item names this problem. No wider literature search was made, none being needed for a refereed answer the site credits.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.