Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 1000
claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 1000, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let be an infinite sequence of integers, and let count the number of such that the fraction does not have denominator for when written in lowest form; equivalently,
for all .
Is there a sequence such that
Formulation. The site's definition counts the whose fraction in lowest terms has denominator different from every earlier . Erdős [Er64b, p. 59], following Cassels, counts instead the with for every and every integer , that is, those whose reduced denominator divides no earlier ; the formal-conjectures statement was corrected to this count on 2026-09-13. The counts differ materially: for the lower limit of is under the source's count and under the site's. The site's count is never smaller than the source's, so the site's question asks for more, and a sequence answering it also answers the source's question. The page's standing concerns the site's wording; the results of Cassels and Erdős below are stated in the source's count.
Status. Proved. The site, accessed 2026-09-04 (page last edited 2025-12-05), labels the problem PROVED (LEAN) and credits Haight's thesis [Ha]; the Lean qualifier refers to a third-party formalization linked on the Haight claim page and not built or audited here.
Source. erdosproblems.com/1000, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1000, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1000.
References.
- [Ca50b] Cassels, J. W. S., Some metrical theorems in Diophantine approximation. I. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. (1950), 209-218.
- [Er64b] Erdős, P., Problems and results on diophantine approximations. Compositio Math. (1964), 52-65.
- [Ha] Haight, John Andrew, Metric Diophantine Approximation and Related Topics. PhD thesis, University of London, Westfield College, February 1971 (the title page's date; the catalog's entry [Ha] gives no year). ProQuest record.
Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures, pinned to the commit of 2026-09-18 that last touched the file, tagged research solved and citing as its formal proof a third-party Lean development of the solution in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository (proof added 2025-12-28), which declares itself a formalization of Haight's solution; it is linked at a pinned commit on the claim page and has not been built or audited here.
Current assessment
The site records Problem 1000 as proved; it credits Cassels with the zero lower limit and Haight with the solution. Haight's thesis has no library card. No literature search beyond those sources and no independent assessment of proof coverage are recorded. The Haight claim page carries the site's acceptance as its evidence and the Lean development as a link; the frontmatter standing follows from it.
Progress
The site's entry attributes a zero-liminf example to Cassels's 1950 paper and the full limit-zero construction to Haight's thesis.
Known Results
- Cassels [Ca50b] (card cassels_1950) introduced the source's count of new fractions (see the Formulation) and constructed sequences with ; as Erdős reports it [Er64b, p. 60], Cassels showed that this lower limit is positive exactly when divergence of forces, for almost all , infinitely many with (the site's remark prints the sum as ).
- Erdős [Er64b] (card erdos_1964) expected that no sequence has limit zero. He proved that cannot tend to zero, and that forces : since , the hypothesis forces arbitrarily large primes to divide terms of , and if is the first term divisible by such a , every prime to is counted, so for arbitrarily large .
- Haight [Ha] constructed a sequence with limit zero, answering the question yes; the Haight claim page records the thesis, the thread's description of the construction (Cassels's finite sequences, scaled by constants and glued together) and the third-party Lean development.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.