Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 929

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 929, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let k≥2k\geq 2 be large and let S(k)S(k) be the minimal xx such that there is a positive density set of nn where

n+1,n+2,…,n+kn+1,n+2,\ldots,n+k

are all divisible by primes ≤x\leq x.

Estimate S(k)S(k) - in particular, is it true that S(k)≥k1−o(1)S(k)\geq k^{1-o(1)}?

Formulation. The site's wording as of 2026-09-18 (page last edited 2 December 2025). "Divisible by primes ≤x\le x" means that each n+in+i has a prime factor at most xx; S(k)S(k) is the least such xx, and it is a prime. The covering form, an elementary equivalence made here: if residue classes apa_p, one for each prime p≤xp\le x, cover [1,k][1,k], then every n≡−ap(modp)n\equiv-a_p\pmod p for all p≤xp\le x, a residue class modulo P(x)=∏p≤xpP(x)=\prod_{p\le x}p of density 1/P(x)>01/P(x)>0, has n+i≡0n+i\equiv0 modulo the pp with i≡api\equiv a_p; conversely a single nn with every n+1,…,n+kn+1,\ldots,n+k divisible by a prime ≤x\le x gives the covering ap:=−n mod pa_p:=-n\bmod p. So S(k)S(k) is the least xx with Y(x)≥kY(x)\ge k, where YY is the covering function of Problem 687; that is, SS is the inverse function of YY, and it is Erdős's B(k)B(k) of [Er79d] p. 79 and f(k)f(k) of [Er80] p. 106, both defined as the least prime cutoff whose residue classes cover an initial interval. The displayed question S(k)≥k1−o(1)S(k)\ge k^{1-o(1)} is Erdős's "It is likely that B(n)>n1−εB(n)>n^{1-\varepsilon}" and Problem 687's second question Y(x)≪x1+o(1)Y(x)\ll x^{1+o(1)}. Erdős's 1976 formulation ([Er76d], p. 26) uses L(n,k)=max⁡1≤i≤kp(n+i)L(n,k)=\max_{1\le i\le k}p(n+i), with p(m)p(m) the least prime factor, and the density α(k,ℓ)\alpha(k,\ell) of nn with L(n,k)=pℓL(n,k)=p_\ell; S(k)=pℓS(k)=p_\ell for the least ℓ\ell with α(k,ℓ)>0\alpha(k,\ell)>0. Two questions: the estimate, to which the label OPEN attaches, and the displayed question, also open.

Status. The site labels the problem OPEN. No source approaching S(k)≥k1−o(1)S(k)\ge k^{1-o(1)} was found in the search whose scope the Current assessment records, and the site's proof-claim tab was empty on 2026-10-07. One partial claim is recorded: the refereed upper bound of [FGKMT18], inverted below. Lower bounds: the site's Rosser bound S(k)>k1/2−o(1)S(k)>k^{1/2-o(1)} is Erdős's report in [Er76d] p. 26 ("Rosser proved [13] that ℓ>k1/2−ε\ell>k^{1/2-\varepsilon}", cited to the Halberstam--Richert book); the stronger S(k)≫k1/2S(k)\gg k^{1/2} is Iwaniec's Y(x)≪x2Y(x)\ll x^2 read through the equivalence, which is how [Er79d] p. 79 states it ("Iwaniec's result B(n)>cnB(n)>c\sqrt n is the best lower bound known"); the bound is the Corollary of [Iw78], p. 226, C(r)≪r2log⁡2rC(r)\ll r^2\log^2r for the longest run of consecutive integers each divisible by one of rr arbitrary primes, taken at r=π(x)r=\pi(x). Upper bounds: the trivial S(k)≤k+1S(k)\le k+1; [Er76d]'s Rankin-type bound as printed; the site's S(k)≪klog⁡3k/(log⁡2klog⁡4k)S(k)\ll k\log_3k/(\log_2k\log_4k), deduced by the site from [FGKMT18] and recorded here as the site's; and the direct inversion of [FGKMT18]'s display (1.2), S(k)≪klog⁡2k/(log⁡klog⁡3k)S(k)\ll k\log_2k/(\log k\log_3k), an authored one-line derivation recorded below and on its claim page, which is smaller than the site's display and implies it. This is a bounded negative finding, not a certificate of openness.

Source. erdosproblems.com/929, accessed 2026-09-18: the problem page (OPEN, with the site's note that the problem cannot be settled by a finite computation; last edited 2 December 2025; source key [Er76d]; commentary citing [FGKMT18] and Problem 4; a thanks line naming one contributor; no formalized statement; OEIS marked possible), its one-comment discussion thread (15 October 2025) and its empty proof-claim tab (also empty on 2026-10-07). Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #929, https://www.erdosproblems.com/929, accessed 2026-09-18.

References.

  • [Er76d] Erdős, P., Problems and results on number theoretic properties of consecutive integers and related questions. Proceedings of the Fifth Manitoba Conference on Numerical Mathematics (Winnipeg, 1975), 25--44 (1976); the L(n,k)L(n,k) passage on printed p. 26; the bibliography on p. 44. Library home: erdos_1976_problems_results_number_theoretic_properties_consecutive; result page conjecture on p. 26.
  • [FGKMT18] Ford, K., Green, B., Konyagin, S., Maynard, J. and Tao, T., Long gaps between primes. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (2018), no. 1, 65--105, DOI 10.1090/jams/876; arXiv:1412.5029v3 (14 July 2016; the journal text not compared). Definition 1, Lemma 1.1 and (1.2), p. 3; (1.3) and the Iwaniec attestation, p. 4. Library home: ford_2018_long_gaps_between_primes; result pages Theorem 1, display (1.2) and Lemma 1.1 with (1.3).
  • [Er79d] Erdős, P., Some unconventional problems in number theory. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 33 (1979), 71--80; the B(n)B(n) passage on printed p. 79. Library home: erdos_1979_unconventional_problems_number_theory; result page Section 3.
  • [Er80] Erdős, P., A survey of problems in combinatorial number theory. Ann. Discrete Math. 6 (1980), 89--115; the f(x)f(x) passage on printed p. 106. Library home: erdos_1980_survey_problems_combinatorial_number_theory.
  • [Iw78] Iwaniec, H., On the problem of Jacobsthal. Demonstratio Math. 11 (1978), no. 1, 225--231, DOI 10.1515/dema-1978-0121 (the printed pages; the Crossref record's 225--232 counts the blank page after the article). The definition of C(r)C(r) on printed p. 225 and the Theorem and Corollary on p. 226. Library home: iwaniec_1978_problem_jacobsthal; result pages Theorem and Corollary.
  • [HaRi74] Halberstam, H. and Richert, H.-E., Sieve Methods. Academic Press (1974); [Er76d]'s reference [13], cited there for Rosser's bound without a page. Not held.
  • [Ra38] Rankin, R. A., The difference between consecutive prime numbers. J. London Math. Soc. 13 (1938), 242--247; [Er76d]'s reference [15]. Not held (closed access; no request made).

Formalization. None in formal-conjectures: no file ErdosProblems/929.lean exists in google-deepmind/formal-conjectures (main when the directory FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/ had 673 entries and the recursive tree 1,740 entries, none of them this file), and the site's indicator shows no formalized statement. The community database (teorth/erdosproblems,) records the problem open (its record last updated 31 August 2025), the statement not formalized, formal_status unformalized, no formal-proof URL and OEIS "possible".

Current assessment

The question (site formulation of 2026-09-18). The statement above; OPEN, with the site's note that the problem cannot be settled by a finite computation; last edited 2 December 2025. The site's commentary makes three points, in this page's words: Rosser's sieve gives the lower bound S(k)>k1/2−o(1)S(k)>k^{1/2-o(1)}; the upper bound S(k)≤k+1S(k)\le k+1 is trivial, by taking n≡1(mod(k+1)!)n\equiv1\pmod{(k+1)!}; and the large-gap theorem of [FGKMT18], via Problem 4, gives S(k)≪klog⁡3k/(log⁡2klog⁡4k)S(k)\ll k\log_3k/(\log_2k\log_4k). The thread holds one comment of 15 October 2025, which pointed out that the trivial bound had been stated as S(k)≤kS(k)\le k with n≡1(modk!)n\equiv1\pmod{k!}, under which n+kn+k need not have a prime factor ≤k\le k, and proposed S(k)≤k+1S(k)\le k+1 with n≡1(mod(k+1)!)n\equiv1\pmod{(k+1)!}; the site notes under the comment that the page was corrected accordingly. The correction is checked here: n+i≡i+1(mod(k+1)!)n+i\equiv i+1\pmod{(k+1)!}, so i+1i+1 divides n+in+i for 1≤i≤k1\le i\le k, and every n+in+i has a prime factor at most k+1k+1. The proof-claim tab was empty on 2026-09-18 and on 2026-10-07.

The origin. [Er76d] p. 26 (result page): Erdős sets L(n,k)=max⁡1≤i≤kp(n+i)L(n,k)=\max_{1\le i\le k}p(n+i), with p(m)p(m) the least prime factor, notes that the density α(k,ℓ)\alpha(k,\ell) of the nn with L(n,k)=pℓL(n,k)=p_\ell exists for every kk and ℓ\ell (display (3)), and calls the least ℓ\ell with α(k,ℓ)>0\alpha(k,\ell)>0 "a very difficult problem". Erdős reports that Brun's method gives ℓ>kc\ell>k^c for some c>0c>0 and that "Rosser proved [13] that ℓ>k1/2−ε\ell>k^{1/2-\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 if k>k0(ε)k>k_0(\varepsilon)", conjectures "Probably in fact α(k,ℓ)>0\alpha(k,\ell)>0 implies ℓ>k1−ε\ell>k^{1-\varepsilon}", records that a result of Rankin [15] gives ℓ<ck(log⁡3k)2/(log⁡k log⁡2k log⁡4k)\ell<ck(\log_3k)^2/(\log k\,\log_2k\,\log_4k), and closes by tying the problem to the differences of consecutive primes. Reference [13] is the Halberstam--Richert book and [15] Rankin's 1938 paper (bibliography, p. 44). The same function, in the covering form, is stated in [Er79d] p. 79 as B(n)B(n), defined there as the least integer such that residues apa_p, one for each prime p≤B(n)p\le B(n), can be chosen with every positive x≤nx\le n in some class ap(modp)a_p\pmod p; Erdős remarks: "As far as I know, Iwaniec's result B(n)>cnB(n)>c\sqrt n is the best lower bound known at present. It would be very nice if one could prove that B(n)>Cn1/2B(n)>Cn^{1/2} for every CC and n>n0(C)n>n_0(C). It is likely that B(n)>n1−εB(n)>n^{1-\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 and n>n1(ε)n>n_1(\varepsilon)". In [Er80] p. 106 it is f(x)f(x) ("In particular must f(x)f(x) be significantly larger than x1/2x^{1/2}?"), with the offer that the site records on Problem 687; both passages are quoted at length on that page. The site's source key for this problem is [Er76d] alone.

The covering form and its consequences. Because S(k)S(k) is the least xx with Y(x)≥kY(x)\ge k (Formulation), every bound on YY inverts into a bound on SS; the four consequences below are one-line derivations made here and named as such. (i) Iwaniec's Y(x)≪x2Y(x)\ll x^2 (the Corollary of [Iw78], p. 226, C(r)≪r2log⁡2rC(r)\ll r^2\log^2r for the longest run of consecutive integers each divisible by one of rr arbitrary primes; Y(x)≤C(π(x))≪x2Y(x)\le C(\pi(x))\ll x^2 is a one-line step made on that result page, and [FGKMT18] p. 4 attests the bound in this form) gives S(k)≫k1/2S(k)\gg k^{1/2}: if Y(x)≤Cx2Y(x)\le Cx^2 and Y(x)≥kY(x)\ge k then x≥(k/C)1/2x\ge(k/C)^{1/2}. This is [Er79d]'s "B(n)>cnB(n)>c\sqrt n" and it is stronger than the site's k1/2−o(1)k^{1/2-o(1)}. (ii) [FGKMT18]'s display (1.2), Y(x)≥cxlog⁡xlog⁡3x/log⁡2xY(x)\ge cx\log x\log_3x/\log_2x for large xx (J. Amer. Math. Soc. 2018, refereed; the statement checked against the paper; its own claim page is Ford, Green, Konyagin, Maynard and Tao), gives S(k)≤xS(k)\le x for the least xx with cxlog⁡xlog⁡3x/log⁡2x≥kcx\log x\log_3x/\log_2x\ge k, that is

S(k) ≪ klog⁡2klog⁡k log⁡3k.S(k)\ \ll\ \frac{k\log_2k}{\log k\,\log_3k}.

(iii) The site's displayed bound S(k)≪klog⁡3k/(log⁡2klog⁡4k)S(k)\ll k\log_3k/(\log_2k\log_4k) is larger than (ii) by a factor log⁡k(log⁡3k)2/((log⁡2k)2log⁡4k)→∞\log k(\log_3k)^2/((\log_2k)^2\log_4k)\to\infty, so it is implied by (ii) and true, but it is not the inversion of (1.2); it has the shape of the prime-gap factor of Theorem 1 with XX replaced by kk. It is recorded as the site's statement, and the difference is recorded as a site-versus-source note that does not affect the label. (iv) Rankin's Y(x)≫xlog⁡xlog⁡3x/(log⁡2x)2Y(x)\gg x\log x\log_3x/(\log_2x)^2 (as [FGKMT18] p. 4 states it) inverts to S(k)≪k(log⁡2k)2/(log⁡klog⁡3k)S(k)\ll k(\log_2k)^2/(\log k\log_3k); Erdős's printed Rankin-type bounds, ℓ<ck(log⁡3k)2/(log⁡klog⁡2klog⁡4k)\ell<ck(\log_3k)^2/(\log k\log_2k\log_4k) for the index ℓ=π(S(k))\ell=\pi(S(k)) in [Er76d] and B(n)<cn(log⁡3n)2/(log⁡nlog⁡2nlog⁡4n)B(n)<cn(\log_3n)^2/(\log n\log_2n\log_4n) in [Er79d], share a shape that this inversion does not reproduce; they are recorded as printed and not reconciled here. The site-accepted AI-generated improvement of the YY bound to xlog⁡x/log⁡3xx\log x/\log_3x, recorded on Problem 687 as the site's account, would give S(k)≪klog⁡3k/log⁡kS(k)\ll k\log_3k/\log k; a lead, not a source result.

Bounds map. k1/2≪S(k)≪klog⁡2k/(log⁡klog⁡3k)k^{1/2}\ll S(k)\ll k\log_2k/(\log k\log_3k) from the sources above (the lower bound by inversion of Iwaniec's Corollary, the upper bound by inversion of a refereed statement), against the trivial S(k)≤k+1S(k)\le k+1 and the conjectured S(k)≥k1−o(1)S(k)\ge k^{1-o(1)} (Erdős 1976 and 1979; the site's displayed question). The exponent gap between 1/21/2 and 11 is untouched. Any progress on the exponent is progress on Problem 687's second question, and conversely.

Search scope (2026-09-18 UTC). None of the routes below found a lower bound with exponent above 1/21/2, an upper bound below the inversion of (1.2), or a proof claim.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; the formal-conjectures directory and tree as of 2026-09-18 (no file); the community database as of 2026-09-18.
  • arXiv: the API queries all:Jacobsthal (40 newest records), abs:"large gaps between primes" OR abs:"long gaps between primes" OR abs:"Jacobsthal function" (21 records) and abs:"residue class" AND abs:prime AND abs:(cover OR covering) AND abs:interval (one record), none on the least prime cutoff; the API searches titles and abstracts only, so these zeros are weak.
  • Semantic Scholar: the 100 records citing [FGKMT18], scanned by title; two adjacent 2025--2026 preprints, one on rough numbers between consecutive primes and one on long runs of integers with small prime factors measured through the divisor function of n!n!, neither bounding S(k)S(k) (abstracts only).
  • Crossref: the record identifying [Iw78]'s DOI; one scripted request to its landing page (HTTP 202, empty body, no PDF).
  • The primary sources: [Er76d] pp. 26 and 44; [FGKMT18] pp. 3--4; [Er79d] p. 79 and [Er80] p. 106.

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X. Not held: [HaRi74], [Ra38]. [Iw78] was not available at the time of the search; the References cite its pages. The site's proof-claim tab was also empty on 2026-10-07.

Remaining gaps. (1) The lower bound k1/2k^{1/2} rests on the Corollary of [Iw78] and on two one-line steps made on its result page and here, from C(π(x))C(\pi(x)) to Y(x)Y(x) and from Y(x)Y(x) to S(k)S(k); the paper's Theorem is cited as stated and its proof is not checked here. (2) The site's displayed upper bound and the inversion of (1.2) differ; the site's is recorded as the site's and the difference is not resolved with the site. (3) Erdős's two printed Rankin-type bounds are recorded as printed and not reconciled with the inversion. (4) The site's page does not cross-reference Problem 687, of which this problem is the inverse form; recorded here as an observation.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.