Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Kenta Kitamura's Lean development, announced on 11 September 2026
in the discussion thread of
Problem 873, claims a proof that
every increasing sequence has .
So no sequence has for every large , against
the suggestion of Erdős in
Some of my forgotten problems in number theory
(p. 48), repeated in the erdosproblems.com commentary, that some sequence may
meet the Erdős–Szemerédi bound for every and not
only for infinitely many. The post names formal-conjectures pull request 5544 as
the submission and the repository linked above, at the commit its web
type-checker link names, as the development. formal-conjectures registers the
development as the formal proof of its variant
erdos_873.variants.supplement_all_scale, which states that no increasing
sequence and constant have for all large .
Submission note. Posted to the erdosproblems.com forum by Kenta Kitamura on 11 September 2026:
I have submitted to Formal Conjectures a Lean-verified negative answer to the conjecture stated on this forum page: “There may be a sequence for which this holds for every .” The submission is PR #5544.
The Lean formalization was prepared by Kenta Kitamura (KitaKen1).
GitHub: https://github.com/KitaKen1/erdos-873-lean Formal Conjectures PR: https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/pull/5544 Lean4Web: open the standalone proof
Verification: no 'sorry' or 'admit'; '#print axioms' reports only 'propext', 'Classical.choice', and 'Quot.sound'.
AI Usage Disclosure: This formalization was developed with assistance from ChatGPT and OpenAI Codex, using GPT-6 (Astra).
Why it is rejected. It answers a variant, not the Statement.
Problem 873 asks whether, for
every , some gives . The development
answers instead the question the erdosproblems.com commentary raises after the
Erdős–Szemerédi bound, whether some sequence has
for every large , formal-conjectures' variant
erdos_873.variants.supplement_all_scale. Its bound,
for arbitrarily large , decides no
exponent that the Erdős–Szemerédi bound leaves open, so the
development's mathematics answers the variant and does not settle this
problem. The value disproved is its answer to that variant.
Standing. Rejected, as answering a variant. This corpus has neither read
the repository nor built the development, so it gives a formalization link and
no formalized evidence, and the axiom report above is the poster's own
statement.
Depends on. No page of this wiki.