Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 748

../

claims/: The 4 claim pages of Problem 748, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let f(n)f(n) count the number of sum-free $A\subseteq {1,\ldots,n}$, i.e. AA contains no solutions to a=b+ca=b+c with a,b,c∈Aa,b,c\in A. Is it true that

f(n)=2(1+o(1))n2?f(n)=2^{(1+o(1))\frac{n}{2}}?

Formulation. The displayed question asks only for the exponent, f(n)=2(1+o(1))n/2f(n)=2^{(1+o(1))n/2}, that is log⁡2f(n)/n→1/2\log_2f(n)/n\to1/2. The site's commentary names the Cameron–Erdős conjecture, which is the stronger bound f(n)=O(2n/2)f(n)=O(2^{n/2}) (Conjecture 1 of [Gr04], after [CaEr90]). The exponent form was settled in 1990–91: Calkin [Ca90] and Alon [Al91] proved f(n)=2n/2+o(n)f(n)=2^{n/2+o(n)} independently, and Erdős and Granville proved it in unpublished work, as the introduction of [Gr04] records (its display (1) and Proposition 12). The bound O(2n/2)O(2^{n/2}) and the two-valued asymptotic below are the later results of Green and Sapozhenko.

Status. The site labels the problem PROVED and credits Green [Gr04] and Sapozhenko [Sa03], who independently proved the stronger bound f(n)≪2n/2f(n)\ll2^{n/2} of the Cameron–Erdős conjecture, and in fact the asymptotic f(n)∼cn2n/2f(n)\sim c_n2^{n/2} with cnc_n taking one of two values according to the parity of nn. The displayed statement itself dates from Calkin [Ca90] and Alon [Al91]: with the trivial lower bound f(n)≥2⌈n/2⌉f(n)\ge2^{\lceil n/2\rceil} from the subsets of (n/2,n](n/2,n], each of their upper bounds 2n/2+o(n)2^{n/2+o(n)} gives f(n)=2(1+o(1))n/2f(n)=2^{(1+o(1))n/2}. Problem 877 is the maximal case. Claim pages: Calkin 1990 (accepted, refereed in Bull. London Math. Soc.), Alon 1991 (accepted, refereed in Israel J. Math.), and, as the later and stronger results, [[problems/integer_sequences/E0748/claims/2003_04_04_green|Green 2003]] (accepted, refereed in Bull. London Math. Soc. 2004) and [[problems/integer_sequences/E0748/claims/2003_01_01_sapozhenko|Sapozhenko 2003]] (accepted, refereed in Discrete Math. 2008 after a Doklady note of 2003; neither held here). The unpublished proof of Erdős and Granville has no posting and so no claim page.

Source. erdosproblems.com/748, accessed 2026-09-04 and 2026-09-05: PROVED, header keys [CaEr90], [Er94b], [Er98], no last-edited line, an empty discussion thread and an empty proof-claim tab, no formalized statement, OEIS A007865. At the access of 2026-10-07 the page shows the same label and commentary, the thread and the tab still empty, and links the formal-conjectures statement with its formal proof (see Formalization). Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #748, https://www.erdosproblems.com/748.

References.

  • [Gr04] Green, B., The Cameron-Erdős conjecture. Bull. London Math. Soc. 36 (2004), no. 6, 769--778, DOI 10.1112/S0024609304003650.
  • [Sa03] Sapozhenko, A. A., The Cameron-Erdős conjecture. Dokl. Akad. Nauk 393 (2003), no. 6, 749--752.
  • [Sa08] Sapozhenko, A. A., The Cameron–Erdős conjecture. Discrete Math. 308 (2008), no. 19, 4361--4369, DOI 10.1016/j.disc.2007.08.103; the full version of [Sa03].
  • [Ca90] Calkin, N. J., On the Number of Sum-Free Sets. Bull. London Math. Soc. 22 (1990), no. 2, 141--144, DOI 10.1112/blms/22.2.141.
  • [Al91] Alon, N., Independent sets in regular graphs and sum-free subsets of finite groups. Israel J. Math. 73 (1991), no. 2, 247--256, DOI 10.1007/BF02772952.
  • [CaEr90] Cameron, P. J. and Erdős, P., On the number of sets of integers with various properties. Number theory (Banff, AB, 1988), de Gruyter, Berlin, 1990, 61--79.
  • [Er94b] Erdős, P., Some problems in number theory, combinatorics and combinatorial geometry. Math. Pannon. 5 (1994), no. 2, 261--269.
  • [Er98] Erdős, P., Some of my new and almost new problems and results in combinatorial number theory. Number theory (Eger, 1996), de Gruyter, Berlin, 1998, 169--180.

Formalization. The statement Erdos748.erdos_748 in formal-conjectures, added 2026-09-20 and amended 2026-09-22 (the commit linked), formalizes the displayed question as log⁡2f(n)/n→1/2\log_2f(n)/n\to1/2, carries the category research solved, and points its formal_proof at Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository, Erdos748.lean, whose header calls the file a Lean formalization of a solution to the problem, names Green and Sapozhenko as its informal authors and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as its formal authors. Its theorem erdos_748 proves log⁡2f(n)/n→1/2\log_2f(n)/n\to1/2, the exponent form only, by a graph-container argument on a cyclic link graph; it does not prove the bound O(2n/2)O(2^{n/2}) or the two-valued asymptotic, which the formal-conjectures file states as further variants without proof. The community database records the statement as formalized (last update 2026-09-20). This corpus has not built or audited that Lean, so the Green and Sapozhenko claim pages carry it as a formalization link and list no formalized evidence.

Current assessment

  • The displayed exponent: Calkin [Ca90] and Alon [Al91] independently proved f(n)=2n/2+o(n)f(n)=2^{n/2+o(n)}, which with the trivial lower bound f(n)≥2⌈n/2⌉f(n)\ge2^{\lceil n/2\rceil} from the subsets of (n/2,n](n/2,n] gives f(n)=2(1+o(1))n/2f(n)=2^{(1+o(1))n/2}; Erdős and Granville proved the same bound in unpublished work, as the introduction of [Gr04] records. Claim pages: Calkin 1990 and Alon 1991.
  • The Cameron–Erdős conjecture: Green [Gr04] and Sapozhenko [Sa03], [Sa08] independently proved f(n)≪2n/2f(n)\ll2^{n/2} and the asymptotic f(n)∼cn2n/2f(n)\sim c_n2^{n/2}, with cnc_n one of two constants according to the parity of nn; the site's label PROVED credits both. Claim pages: Green 2003 and Sapozhenko 2003; library home green_2004_cameron_erdos_conjecture.
  • Lean: Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs file Erdos748.lean proves the exponent form log⁡2f(n)/n→1/2\log_2f(n)/n\to1/2 only, naming Green and Sapozhenko as its informal authors and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as its formal authors; not built or audited by this corpus, it is a formalization link on the Green and Sapozhenko claim pages (see Formalization above).

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.