Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 691

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 691, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Given A⊆NA\subseteq \mathbb{N} let $M_A={ n \geq 1 : a\mid n\textrm{ for some }a\in A}$ be the set of multiples of AA. Find a necessary and sufficient condition on AA for MAM_A to have density 11.

Status. Open, the site's label. The site credits Tenenbaum's 1996 theorem. For block sequences whose consecutive ratios lie between two constants above 11 and whose blocks have relative length j−αj^{-\alpha}, it proves Erdős's threshold conjecture with critical exponent log⁡2\log 2 (claim page), an accepted partial claim with refereed evidence. It does not answer the general question, so the derived standing is open with claim none. A thread note of 17 April 2026 with a Lean formalization, both produced with GPT-5.4 Pro, proves the classical Davenport--Erdős criterion: MAM_A has density 11 exactly when the densities of the multiples of A∩[1,N]A\cap[1,N] tend to 11. On 18 April 2026 its author recast it as an exposition of that known fact (equation (1.3) of Hall and Tenenbaum), so it has no claim page.

Source. erdosproblems.com/691, accessed 2026-09-04 and 2026-10-07 (problem page last edited 28 December 2025; its discussion thread held four posts and its proof-claims page listed no claim). Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #691, https://www.erdosproblems.com/691.

References.

Formalization. None recorded: the site lists no formal-conjectures statement for the problem. The Lean file of the thread note of 17 April 2026 formalizes the Davenport--Erdős criterion described in Status, not the problem.

Current assessment

The question, as the site states it (page last edited 28 December 2025): for A⊆NA\subseteq\mathbb N and MAM_A its set of multiples, find a necessary and sufficient condition on AA for MAM_A to have density 11; such an AA is called a Behrend sequence. The problem is Erdős's, from p. 77 of [Er79e].

What is known. For a set of primes, or more generally of pairwise coprime integers greater than 11, the condition is that the sum of the reciprocals diverges, by the Davenport--Erdős theorem. The general case is harder. Erdős's example is the block sequence A=⋃k(nk,(1+ηk)nk)∩ZA=\bigcup_k(n_k,(1+\eta_k)n_k)\cap\mathbb Z over a lacunary sequence n1<n2<⋯n_1<n_2<\cdots: if ∑ηk<∞\sum\eta_k<\infty, or if ηk=1/k\eta_k=1/k, the density of MAM_A exists and is less than 11, and Erdős wrote that a threshold α∈(0,1)\alpha\in(0,1) seemed certain to exist such that for ηk=k−β\eta_k=k^{-\beta} the density is 11 when β<α\beta<\alpha and less than 11 when β>α\beta>\alpha. Tenenbaum [Te96] notes that this fails as written, since for nkn_k growing fast enough the sequence is never Behrend, and that Erdős had a two-sided condition on nk+1/nkn_{k+1}/n_k in mind; his Corollary 2 then proves the two-sided conjecture with α=log⁡2\alpha=\log2 (claim page Tenenbaum 1996). The same paper gives a sufficient condition for a block sequence to be Behrend, adjacent to the necessary condition of Hall and Tenenbaum, and says that effective general criteria seem out of reach with present techniques. The general question is open.

Search scope. As of 2026-10-07 the site's discussion thread held four posts: a deleted post and the curator's reply of 31 August 2025, and the exchange of 17 and 18 April 2026 on the Davenport--Erdős criterion described in Status; its proof-claims page listed no claim. The library card of [Te96] records the statements of its Theorem 1 and Corollaries 1 and 2; nothing here is independently reviewed.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.