Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 361
claims/: The 4 claim pages of Problem 361, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let and be some large integer. What is the size of the largest such that is not a sum of a subset of ? Does this depend on in an irregular way?
Formulation. The source, Erdős and Graham (1980, p. 59), asks how many integers less than , for fixed and large , can be chosen with not a sum of a subset of them, and whether this depends on "in an irregular way". The site's set with real extends , up to the endpoint . Neither source defines irregular. This page and its claims read the second question as asking whether fails to converge, the reading Beyer de Ryke's note states as its interpretation.
Status. Open. Writing for the largest size, Alon's refereed Corollary 2.6 of 1987 gives along even (claim page), and three partial claims of 2026 are pending: a proof claim filed as full by Principia Math (using GPT 5.6 and Opus 4.8, as the proof-claims tab names them) on 23 July 2026, whose theorem says that does not converge for and that for , and which its thread records, with the claimant's agreement, as answering the second question and not the first ([[problems/integer_sequences/E0361/claims/2026_07_23_principia_math|claim page]]); Beyer de Ryke's note of 25 July 2026 in the same thread, proving the same non-convergence with explicit limits along arithmetic subsequences ([[problems/integer_sequences/E0361/claims/2026_07_25_beyer_de_ryke|claim page]]); and Principia Math's second result, announced in the thread on 8 August 2026, an inverse zero-sum theorem giving along the multiples of not divisible by the least non-divisor of , for , with its representation theorem for and stated in Lean ([[problems/integer_sequences/E0361/claims/2026_08_08_principia_math|claim page]]). The site's label is OPEN (page last edited 17 October 2025; thread and proof-claims tab accessed 2026-10-07).
Source. erdosproblems.com/361, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #361, https://www.erdosproblems.com/361.
Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures.
Current assessment
No independent assessment of proof coverage is recorded. The frontmatter standing is derived from the four claim pages, one accepted and three pending partial claims, so the problem is open: the first question, the size of the largest set, is determined exactly by the claims only for , and asymptotically along some arithmetic subsequences of for (Alon's Corollary 2.6 at , Beyer de Ryke's limits and Principia Math's second claim); no claim determines for every when . Search scope, 2026-10-07: the site's page, its discussion thread and its proof-claims tab with the comments under the claim, the claimant's repository, the note linked in the thread and the papers these cite.
Known Results
Alon's refereed Corollary 2.6 of 1987
(claim page) gives
the largest subset of with no subset summing to as
, that is along even , which settles a
problem of Erdős and Graham. Three pending claims of 2026 follow, none adopted
here: two answer the second question and the third bears on the first. Principia
Math's manuscript (23 July 2026; the
[[problems/integer_sequences/E0361/claims/2026_07_23_principia_math|claim
page]]) proves that does not converge for every : along odd
the even integers give , while
along even Alon's bounded zero-sum theorem forces a bound strictly below
; for pairing with gives $f_c(n)=\lfloor
cn\rfloor-\lceil n/2\rceil$, so . Its Lean 4 development
states both results and reports the standard axioms, with records in its tree
that disagree about whether Alon's theorem is proved or assumed; it was neither
built nor audited here. Beyer de Ryke's note (25 July 2026; the
claim page)
proves the same non-convergence with limits along arithmetic subsequences
depending on the small divisors of , for instance along
odd and along even not divisible by , arbitrarily many
subsequential densities in the fixed-parameter formulation, and the same exact
formula for ; it leaves the exact behavior for general and open.
Principia Math's second manuscript (8 August 2026; the
[[problems/integer_sequences/E0361/claims/2026_08_08_principia_math|claim
page]]) proves that for , the least positive
integer not dividing , and , every $A\subseteq{1,\ldots,\lfloor
xT\rfloor}$ with has a subset summing to once
is large, so that along with for
; its Lean theorem basile71_unconditional states the case ,
, neither built nor audited here. The site's discussion thread
(October 2025) records computed values at for
(), the trivial value for , and candidate
extremal constructions from the multiples of the least prime power not dividing
and from intervals , which already show that the extremal set
depends on the arithmetic of . None of the three 2026 claims has a refereed
version, site acceptance or independent review.