Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 404
claims/: The 3 claim pages of Problem 404, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. For which integers and primes is there a finite upper bound on those such that there are with
If is the greatest such , how does this function behave?
Is there a prime and an infinite sequence such that if is the highest power of dividing then $m_k\to \infty$?
Status. Open. The site labels the problem OPEN (page last edited 29 September 2025) and credits Lin [Li76] with , a pending partial claim on its claim page; the exact values of for and of at some pairs with posted in the thread in July 2026 are pending partial claims on their page for p = 2 and their page for odd primes; the September 2025 comments in the thread are posts without a manuscript and have none. The standing in the frontmatter derives from the claim pages.
Source. erdosproblems.com/404, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #404, https://www.erdosproblems.com/404.
References.
- [Li76] Lin, S., On two problems of Erdős concerning sums of distinct factorials. Bell Laboratories internal memorandum (1976); the site's citation prints 1960, a misprint (see Problem 403).
Formalization. None recorded: formal-conjectures has no statement file for the problem, and the community database lists it as not formalized. The Lean certificates of particular values of are linked from Kitamura's claim pages; this corpus has not built them.
Current assessment
The questions, as the site states them (page last edited 29 September 2025): for which and primes is the exponent of in a sum of distinct factorials beginning with bounded; how does the largest exponent behave; and is there a prime and an infinite increasing sequence whose partial factorial sums are divisible by ever higher powers of ? All three are open. The site's commentary records one result, Lin's from his 1976 memorandum, so the first question has the answer yes at . Kitamura's two repositories of July 2026 compute exactly for every , with (so Lin's bound is sharp), for odd , and the largest value in the range, and compute exactly at some pairs with ; each exact value answers the first question yes at its pair. Their lower-bound witnesses, such as , decide nothing. Tao's thread posts of 29 September 2025 observe that appears very large and possibly infinite, and give a lemma for lifting a lower bound on from to when the subset sums of consecutive factorials cover the residues modulo the relevant power of ; the posts are comments without a manuscript and have no pages. No result on the behavior of beyond these values, and nothing on the third question, is recorded; no refereed result is known.