Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 401

../

claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 401, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Is there some function f(r)f(r) such that f(r)→∞f(r)\to \infty as r→∞r\to\infty, such that, for infinitely many nn, there exist a1,a2a_1,a_2 with

a1+a2>n+f(r)log⁡na_1+a_2> n+f(r)\log n

such that a1!a2!∣n!2n3n⋯prna_1!a_2! \mid n!2^n3^n\cdots p_r^n?

Formulation. The source [ErGr80] leaves the quantifier on nn open; the site reads the problem as asking for infinitely many nn, by comparison with Problems 728 and 729, and that reading is the statement above and the target of the standing. The reading with all sufficiently large nn is false; see the Current assessment.

Status. PROVED (LEAN). The site labels the problem PROVED (LEAN) (page last edited 12 January 2026) and credits a proof by Barreto and Leeham, working with ChatGPT, recorded on its claim page; the Lean qualifier refers to the Aristotle-generated formalization of that proof in Boris Alexeev's repository, which this corpus has not built. A second route, the deduction from the Problem 729 construction that ChatGPT noticed and Nat Sothanaphan posted and checked, developed in the appendix of his write-up of Problem 728, is a pending claim on its own page. There is no refereed write-up. The standing in the frontmatter derives from the claim pages.

Source. erdosproblems.com/401, accessed 2026-09-04 and, with its discussion thread, its empty proof-claims list, the community database, the formal-conjectures statement file and the two Lean files, 2026-10-07. The site cites the problem from p. 78 of Erdős and Graham's 1980 problem book. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #401, https://www.erdosproblems.com/401.

References.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures, linked at the commit of 18 September 2026; at that commit the file states erdos_401 : answer(True) ↔ … with sorry and names as its formal proof the file Erdos401.lean of Boris Alexeev's repository; that file and its first version are linked, at pinned commits, from the claim page. This corpus has built neither.

Current assessment

The question, as the site states it (page last edited 12 January 2026): with PrP_r the product of the first rr primes, is there f(r)→∞f(r)\to\infty such that infinitely many nn admit a1,a2a_1,a_2 with a1+a2>n+f(r)log⁡na_1+a_2>n+f(r)\log n and a1!a2!∣n!Prna_1!a_2!\mid n!P_r^n? The answer is yes.

The two readings. Erdős and Graham wrote the problem without fixing whether the inequality should hold for infinitely many nn or for all large nn. For all large nn it fails: Nat Sothanaphan showed in the thread (10 January 2026, with ChatGPT) that for r≥2r\ge2 and n=pr+1k−1n=p_{r+1}^k-1 the divisibility forces a1+a2≤n+2pr+1a_1+a_2\le n+2p_{r+1}, so no f(r)→∞f(r)\to\infty can work there. The site's curator confirmed in the thread (11 January 2026) that the reading with infinitely many nn is the intended one, and the formal-conjectures statement encodes it. The refutation of the other reading is a thread post about a variant and has no claim page.

The resolution. Barreto and Leeham, with ChatGPT, proved the stated reading (11 January 2026) by the construction they had used for Problem 729: n=2mn=2m, a1=m+ka_1=m+k, a2=ma_2=m with kk of order clog⁡nc\log n, the small primes absorbed by PrnP_r^n and the large primes controlled through Kummer's theorem by a count of carries; the explicit f(r)f(r) of the Lean file grows like $p_{r+1}/\log p_{r+1}$. The claim page records the construction, the two Lean files at pinned commits and the acceptance: the site's curator credits the proof and the community database records the problem as proved with a Lean proof (last updated 11 January 2026); there is no refereed write-up, and no Lean file is built here. The same day Sothanaphan reported in the thread that ChatGPT had noticed that the Problem 729 construction implies this problem, and posted the deduction with his own check of it; the appendix of his write-up [So26] of the Problem 728 proof derives both from a density-one theorem about valuations of binomial coefficients; that route is sketched rather than proved in full and no reviewer has accepted it, so its page is a pending claim. Carl Pomerance's note extending his earlier work on divisors of the middle binomial coefficient, which [So26] compares with its Theorem 2, concerns Problem 400 and is not a result on this problem.

Search scope, 2026-10-07: the site's problem page, its discussion thread and proof-claims list, the community database, the formal-conjectures statement file and the two Lean files in Alexeev's repository, and the library's card and digest for [So26] for the appendix. The site lists no proof claim for the problem. Problem 729 is the less precise form of this question, and Problem 728 the two-factorial divisibility it extends.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.