Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 1155

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 1155, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Construct a random graph on nn vertices in the following way: begin with the complete graph KnK_n. At each stage, choose uniformly a random triangle in the graph and delete all the edges of this triangle. Repeat until the graph is triangle-free.

Describe the typical parameters and structure of such a graph. In particular, if f(n)f(n) is the number of edges remaining, then is it true that

Ef(n)≍n3/2\mathbb{E}f(n)\asymp n^{3/2}

and that f(n)≪n3/2f(n) \ll n^{3/2} almost surely?

Formulation. The site's wording as of 2026-10-07 (page last edited 25 January 2026). The process is the random greedy triangle packing of KnK_n, and f(n)f(n) is the number of edges of the terminal triangle-free graph, the leave of that packing. The processes for different nn are not coupled, so this page reads "almost surely", as the site's own commentary does, as with probability tending to one as n→∞n\to\infty: the second question asks for a constant CC with P(f(n)≤Cn3/2)→1\mathbb P(f(n)\le Cn^{3/2})\to1. The statement has three parts: the open-ended request for the typical parameters and structure, and the two displayed questions on the order of f(n)f(n). Of the site's two source keys, the 1999 booklet's item ([Va99], 3.61) poses only the open-ended request: it describes the process and asks for the typical parameters and structure of the final graph, adding that the problem came from the task of generating a random triangle-free graph. Neither displayed question appears in it, so the two come from the site's other key, [Bo98], which is not held.

Status. Open. What is proved: f(n)=n3/2+o(1)f(n)=n^{3/2+o(1)} with high probability, that is P(n3/2−ϵ<f(n)<n3/2+ϵ)→1\mathbb P(n^{3/2-\epsilon}<f(n)<n^{3/2+\epsilon})\to1 for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0, by Bohman, Frieze and Lubetzky [BFL15], Theorem 1 (refereed; the theorem and the introduction are recorded on its library card), which settles the exponent conjectured by Bollobás and Erdős but neither of the displayed questions as asked, since both concern the order n3/2n^{3/2} itself. One partial claim is accepted: a preprint of the OpenAI mathematics release of 2026-09-25 proves f(n)/n3/2→1/(22)f(n)/n^{3/2}\to1/(2\sqrt2) in L2L^2, hence in probability and in mean, which answers both displayed questions with the sharp constant; it is recorded on its claim page as accepted on its Lean declaration, which the corpus's verification built and audited, though the manuscript has no independent review. It does not address the request for the typical structure, for which no claim is recorded, so the problem stays open. No literature search beyond the sources named on this page was made, so this page certifies no openness.

Source. erdosproblems.com/1155, accessed 2026-10-07: the problem page (OPEN; last edited 25 January 2026; source keys [Bo98], p. 231, and [Va99], 3.61; commentary citing [Gr97] and [BFL15]; no formalized statement), its one-comment discussion thread (24 January 2026) and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1155, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1155, accessed 2026-10-07.

References.

  • [BFL15] Bohman, Tom and Frieze, Alan and Lubetzky, Eyal, Random triangle removal. Adv. Math. 280 (2015), 379--438; arXiv:1203.4223. Library home: bohman_2015_random_triangle_removal (Theorem 1 and the introduction are recorded on the card).
  • [Bo98] Bollobás, Béla, To prove and conjecture: Paul Erdős and his mathematics. Amer. Math. Monthly 105 (1998), 209--237; pp. 231--232 per the site and its thread. Not held.
  • [Gr97] Grable, David A., On random greedy triangle packing. Electron. J. Combin. 4 (1997), Research Paper 11, 19 pp. Not held; its bounds are taken from the site, the introduction of [BFL15] and Section 1 of [OAI26].
  • [Va99] Various, Some of Paul's favorite problems. Booklet produced for the conference "Paul Erdős and his mathematics", Budapest, July 1999; item 3.61 in Section 3.4, Random structures. Library home: various_1999_some_pauls_favorite_problems (Kovač's public image-only scan of paired pages; the item is on the right leaf of its PDF p. 6).
  • [JoKu24] Joos, Felix and Kühn, Marcus, The hypergraph removal process. arXiv:2412.15039 (version 2). Not held; cited by [OAI26] for the conjectured constant (its Conjecture 16.2) and for the only external proof input of its argument.
  • [OAI26] OpenAI, The sharp terminal leave in random triangle removal. OpenAI Math Release preprint, 25 September 2026, in the release's repository at the revision the claim page pins; a preprint with no journal or arXiv version. Library home: openai_2026_sharp_terminal_leave_random_triangle_removal; the main result is paged at theorem_1_1.

Formalization. None in the catalogs: formal-conjectures has no file ErdosProblems/1155.lean (main,), the site's page shows no formalized statement, and the community database records the problem open (last update 23 January 2026) and unformalized (both). The OpenAI release proves its theorem in Lean against its own model of the process, the declaration OAI.SharpTerminalLeave.sharp_terminal_leave; the corpus's verification built it at the pinned revision with the toolchain leanprover/lean4:v4.34.1, found its axioms to be exactly propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound and its fingerprint identical to the comparator challenge, and audited the model against the process of the Statement, as recorded on the claim page. It certifies the three limits for the edge count and nothing about the structure of the terminal graph.

Current assessment

The question (site formulation of 2026-10-07). The statement above; OPEN; last edited 25 January 2026. The site's commentary, in this page's words: the problem is Bollobás and Erdős's, posed in 1990 at a graph theory conference in Fairbanks, Alaska, as [Bo98] tells it, and [Va99] records that the problem came from wanting to generate a random triangle-free graph; Grable [Gr97] proved P(f(n)>n7/4+ϵ)→0\mathbb P(f(n)>n^{7/4+\epsilon})\to0 for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0 (an attribution qualified below); and the theorem of Bohman, Frieze and Lubetzky [BFL15], f(n)=n3/2+o(1)f(n)=n^{3/2+o(1)} almost surely, is restated by the commentary as P(n3/2−ϵ<f(n)<n3/2+ϵ)→1\mathbb P(n^{3/2-\epsilon}<f(n)<n^{3/2+\epsilon})\to1 for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0. The thread's one comment (24 January 2026, marked as addressed by the site) reports the same theorem and the origin story from pp. 231--232 of [Bo98]. The proof-claim tab is empty.

The exponent, proved. Theorem 1 of [BFL15], as its library card records it: with high probability the process stops after n2/6−n3/2+o(1)n^2/6-n^{3/2+o(1)} steps, so the terminal graph has n3/2+o(1)n^{3/2+o(1)} edges. The upper bound tracks the counts of rooted homomorphisms from a family of glued-triangle graphs by a system of martingales, using the self-correcting drift of the process to keep every count near its random-graph trajectory down to n3/2+ϵn^{3/2+\epsilon} edges; the lower bound argues from that point that n3/2−o(1)n^{3/2-o(1)} edges survive. This improves Grable's bounds and confirms the exponent 3/23/2 conjectured by Bollobás and Erdős. It does not give Ef(n)≍n3/2\mathbb Ef(n)\asymp n^{3/2} or f(n)≪n3/2f(n)\ll n^{3/2} with probability tending to one, the two displayed questions, which ask for the order without the no(1)n^{o(1)} factor. Basis: the theorem and the introduction, as the card records them; the proof was not read.

Grable's bounds. The site and the abstract of [BFL15] credit Grable [Gr97] with f(n)≤n7/4+o(1)f(n)\le n^{7/4+o(1)} with high probability. The introduction of [BFL15] says that Grable proved n11/6+o(1)n^{11/6+o(1)} with high probability and described how similar arguments, with more delicate calculations, should extend that result to n7/4+o(1)n^{7/4+o(1)}; Section 1 of [OAI26] likewise says that Grable proved O(n11/6+ξ)O(n^{11/6+\xi}) for every fixed ξ>0\xi>0 and outlined the higher-order calculations leading to O(n7/4+ξ)O(n^{7/4+\xi}) (his Theorems 5 and 7). [Gr97] is not held, so this page records 11/611/6 as the exponent Grable proved and 7/47/4 as the one he outlined.

The sharp constant, formally verified. The release preprint [OAI26], Theorem 1.1, states E[(f(n)/n3/2−1/(22))2]→0\mathbb E[(f(n)/n^{3/2}-1/(2\sqrt2))^2]\to0, hence f(n)/n3/2→1/(22)f(n)/n^{3/2}\to1/(2\sqrt2) in probability and Ef(n)/n3/2→1/(22)\mathbb Ef(n)/n^{3/2}\to1/(2\sqrt2), the triangle case of the Joos--Kühn conjecture [JoKu24] in L2L^2 form, with the early-prefix control of [JoKu24] as its only external input. Both displayed questions therefore have the answer yes with the constant 1/(22)1/(2\sqrt2), under this page's reading of "almost surely". The claim page records the statement, the method as the manuscript outlines it, the release's Lean statement and the acceptance on it: the corpus's verification built the declaration, checked its axioms and its fingerprint against the comparator challenge, and audited the model of the process clause by clause, while the manuscript has no journal or arXiv version and no independent review. It says nothing about the typical structure of the terminal graph beyond its edge count.

Search scope (2026-10-07 UTC). The site's problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab, the formal-conjectures tree and the community database, with the library cards of [BFL15], [Va99] and [OAI26], the last with the release's comparator statement and solution module. No database, arXiv or publisher search was made for this problem. [Bo98], [Gr97] and [JoKu24] are not held; what this page says of them comes from the site, its thread, the introduction of [BFL15] and the release manuscript's own account.

Remaining gaps. (1) The displayed questions are answered by the sharp constant, accepted on its formalization alone: the refereed result gives the exponent only, and the manuscript has no outside review. (2) The request for the typical parameters and structure of the terminal graph has no result or claim recorded on this page; the release manuscript asserts no fluctuation law. (3) No literature search beyond the site's sources was made, and the proof of [BFL15] was not read. (4) There is no Lean statement of the problem in the catalogs; the release's statement models the process in its own terms, and the corpus's audit found that model faithful to the process of the Statement.

Known results

  • Bohman, Frieze and Lubetzky 2015, Theorem 1 (refereed): f(n)=n3/2+o(1)f(n)=n^{3/2+o(1)} with high probability, the exponent conjectured by Bollobás and Erdős.
  • Grable 1997 (not held): f(n)≤n11/6+o(1)f(n)\le n^{11/6+o(1)} with high probability, as the introduction of [BFL15] reports it; the site and the abstract of [BFL15] credit him with n7/4+o(1)n^{7/4+o(1)}, which [BFL15] and [OAI26] describe as outlined, not proved.
  • OpenAI 2026, Theorem 1.1 (release preprint, formally verified): f(n)/n3/2→1/(22)f(n)/n^{3/2}\to1/(2\sqrt2) in L2L^2; accepted as partial on its Lean declaration on its claim page, with no outside review of the manuscript.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.