Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. In the letters of Problem 1079: a graph GG on nn vertices with at least ex(n;Kr)\mathrm{ex}(n;K_r) edges, r≥3r\ge3, either is the Turán graph Tr−1(n)T_{r-1}(n) or has a vertex xx of degree d>n(1−1r−1−11+r−1)d>n\bigl(1-\frac1{r-1}-\frac1{1+\sqrt{r-1}}\bigr) whose neighborhood contains at least ex(d;Kr−1)+1\mathrm{ex}(d;K_{r-1})+1 edges. This is the Theorem (p. 111) of B. Bollobás and A. Thomason, Dense neighbourhoods and Turán's theorem, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 31 (1981), no. 1, 111--114, which writes rr for the number of parts of the Turán graph, one less than the problem's rr, and tr(n)t_r(n) for its number of edges. It answers the question yes for every r≥4r\ge4 with an explicit constant cr=1−1r−1−11+r−1c_r=1-\frac1{r-1}-\frac1{1+\sqrt{r-1}} (about 0.300.30 at r=4r=4), with one qualification recorded on the result page: the printed proof gives this explicit constant for n≥(r−1)(1+r−1)2/2n\ge(r-1)(1+\sqrt{r-1})^2/2 in the problem's indexing, where its last inequality holds (with equality at the threshold, the step before it being strict), and for every nn some positive crc_r, since the vertex found lies in a triangle, which is all the question needs. The Turán graph itself meets the site's conclusion with equality, since the neighborhood of any of its vertices induces Tr−2(d)T_{r-2}(d) with exactly ex(d;Kr−1)\mathrm{ex}(d;K_{r-1}) edges and d≥(r−2)⌊n/(r−1)⌋d\ge(r-2)\lfloor n/(r-1)\rfloor, and every other graph has the vertex with the "+1+1" of Erdős's own wording. Erdős asked for graphs with fr(n)=ex(n;Kr)+1f_r(n)=\mathrm{ex}(n;K_r)+1 edges and a star spanning at least fr−1(m)=ex(m;Kr−1)+1f_{r-1}(m)=\mathrm{ex}(m;K_{r-1})+1 edges; such a graph is not the Turán graph, so the theorem answers that formulation too, and with it the neighborhood contains a Kr−1K_{r-1} and the graph a KrK_r, the generalization of Turán's theorem Erdős had in mind. The paper attributes the conjecture to Erdős's 1975 survey. The proof (pp. 112--114) counts triangles against the degree sequence, with equality exactly for complete multipartite graphs.

Formalization. The file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos1079.lean of Boris Alexeev's repository plby/lean-proofs, linked above at the commit of 15 September 2026 that formal-conjectures cites (the file was first added on 2026-08-17), declares itself a Lean formalization of a solution to Problem 1079 and names Béla Bollobás and Andrew Thomason as its informal authors and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as its formal authors, so it is a link on this page and not an independent claim. Under the toolchain Lean v4.33.0 it proves erdos_problem_1079: for r≥4r\ge4, n≥2n\ge2 and a graph on nn vertices with at least ex(n;Kr)\mathrm{ex}(n;K_r) edges, some vertex vv of maximum degree has n≤2deg⁡vn\le2\deg v and at least ex(deg⁡v;Kr−1)\mathrm{ex}(\deg v;K_{r-1}) edges in its neighborhood; it does not except the Turán graph, since a maximum-degree vertex always meets the non-strict conclusion (the Bondy claim page). It also proves erdos_1079, the strict form above the threshold, which the formal-conjectures statement file ErdosProblems/1079.lean names as the formal_proof of its variant erdos_1079.variants.bondy. The file carries no sorry and prints the axioms of both theorems. The corpus has not built or audited it, so it gives no formalized evidence.

Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the argument is self-contained.

Acceptance. Refereed: Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B (the Crossref record: volume 31, issue 1, pp. 111--114, issued August 1981; the day is the issue's nominal first day, used for this page's date). Reviewed: the site's curator, T. F. Bloom, labels the problem solved and names this paper as the proof, and Bondy restates the theorem as a known result in his refereed note of 1983 (Theorem 1), crediting it also to an independent proof by Erdős and Sós in a preprint, which is not a source of this page. The source card cites the publication, describes the publisher's open-archive version and holds no file; it records four observations on the printed proof. Nothing is independently reviewed. The acceptance recorded here rests on the publication, the restatement and the site's acceptance, not on a local review. The site labels the problem SOLVED; since the result is an affirmative proof, the claim value here is proved, and the problem page's Status sentence keeps the site's label. Bondy's own strengthening has the page Bondy.