Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 1031

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 1031, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. If GG is a graph on nn vertices which contains no trivial (empty or complete) subgraph on ≥10log⁡n\geq 10\log n many vertices, then must GG contain an induced non-trivial regular subgraph on ≫log⁡n\gg \log n many vertices?

Formulation. A trivial subgraph is a complete or an empty induced subgraph, so the hypothesis says that GG has no clique and no independent set on 10log⁡n10\log n or more vertices. This is the site's reading: its commentary says that by Ramsey's theorem every graph on nn vertices has a trivial subgraph on ≫log⁡n\gg\log n vertices. It is also the reading of [Er93], which calls a graph trivial when it is complete or empty and states Ramsey's theorem in those terms (Chapter II, printed p. 337), and whose t(n)t(n) on p. 340, the largest trivial subgraph every G(n)G(n) must contain, is a Ramsey quantity. Read as the site words it, with subgraphs that need not be induced, every graph on n≥10log⁡nn\ge10\log n vertices has an empty subgraph on all its vertices, so the hypothesis fails for all large nn and the question holds vacuously. The answer is yes on both readings, on the induced one by [PrRo99] as the claim page records, so the standing does not change.

Status. Proved. The site credits Prömel and Rödl [PrRo99], whose theorem is stronger than the question: for every c>0c>0, a graph on nn vertices with no trivial subgraph on clog⁡nc\log n vertices contains every graph on Oc(log⁡n)O_c(\log n) vertices as an induced subgraph, among them a cycle, which is regular and non-trivial. The paper (J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 88 (1999), 379--384; refereed) is not held; its statement is known through its signed zbMATH review and the site, and the claim page Prömel and Rödl records it as accepted on the refereed venue and the curator's acceptance after the forum comment of 13 September 2025, with the zbMATH review as the source of the statement's wording; the proof-claim tab is empty and nothing is independently reviewed here.

Source. erdosproblems.com/1031, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1031, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1031.

References.

  • [Er93] Erdős, Paul, Some of my favorite solved and unsolved problems in graph theory. Quaestiones Math. 16 (1993), 333--350. Chapter II, printed p. 340: "Fajtlowicz, Staton and I further asked: Suppose G(n)G(n) contains no trivial subgraph of size say 10log⁡n10\log n, must it then contain an induced non trivial regular subgraph of size clog⁡nc\log n? Perhaps very much more is true but we could not even prove this seemingly weak result", the problem's question stated without proof or reference. Library home: erdos_1993_my_favorite_solved_unsolved_problems_graph_theory.
  • [PrRo99] Prömel, Hans Jürgen and Rödl, Vojtěch, Non-Ramsey graphs are clog⁡nc\log n-universal. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 88 (1999), no. 2, 379--384.

Formalization. No formal-conjectures statement file ErdosProblems/1031.lean existed at main on 2026-10-07, and the site's indicator and the community database (teorth/erdosproblems, data/problems.yaml,) record no formalized statement. The file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos1031.lean of Boris Alexeev's plby/lean-proofs repository declares itself a formalization of Prömel and Rödl's solution, with Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as formal authors; it is a formalization link on the claim page, not built or audited here, so the claim gains no formalized evidence.

Current assessment

The question is answered yes, in a form stronger than asked. Prömel and Rödl [PrRo99] prove that for every c>0c>0 a graph on nn vertices with no clique or independent set on clog⁡nc\log n vertices contains every graph on Oc(log⁡n)O_c(\log n) vertices as an induced subgraph. Taking the target graph to be a cycle on that many vertices gives an induced regular subgraph that is neither empty nor complete, which is what the question asks for with c=10c=10; the deduction is written on the claim page Prömel and Rödl. The paper is not held, its theorem is known through the signed zbMATH review and the site's commentary, and nothing is independently reviewed here.

Search scope. None of the routes below found a correction, retraction or dispute of [PrRo99], or a proof claim.

  • The site: problem page (PROVED; source key [Er93, p. 340]), discussion thread (two comments of 13 September 2025) and proof-claim tab (empty); the community database (proved; no formalized statement); formal-conjectures at main (no file 1031).
  • The Crossref record of [PrRo99] (issued November 1999; no correction or update notice attached) and the zbMATH review Zbl 0934.05090 (R. J. Faudree), which states the theorem as recorded under Known results.
  • The OpenAlex list of works citing [PrRo99] (40 records, by title; none a correction or dispute); arXiv API: abs:"induced regular subgraph" (2 records, neither on this question) and abs:"non-Ramsey" AND abs:"universal" (no relevant record).

Not searched: MathSciNet, Google Scholar, the full texts of the citing works. Not held: [PrRo99].

Known results

  • [Er93], p. 340: the question, posed with Fajtlowicz and Staton, without proof or reference.
  • [PrRo99] (refereed, not held; the theorem as the signed zbMATH review Zbl 0934.05090 states it): for every c1>0c_1>0 there is c2>0c_2>0 such that every graph GG on nn vertices in which neither GG nor its complement contains a complete graph on c1log⁡2nc_1\log_2 n vertices contains every graph on c2log⁡2nc_2\log_2 n vertices as an induced subgraph; the accepted claim, recorded on the claim page Prömel and Rödl.
  • The file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos1031.lean of Boris Alexeev's plby/lean-proofs repository, a formalization of Prömel and Rödl's solution carried as a formalization link on that claim page; not built or audited here, so it gives no formalized evidence.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.