Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. The second question of Problem 883 has a positive answer: for every there is such that for and every with , the coprime graph contains a complete tripartite graph on vertices. This follows from Theorem 1 of G. N. Sárközy, Complete tripartite subgraphs in the coprime graph of integers, Discrete Math. 202 (1999), no. 1-3, 227--238: there are constants such that if and , where counts the integers up to divisible by or by , that is, , then for . Since this tends to infinity with , every fixed is reached for all large . The paper poses the result as the answer to the question Erdős raised in his last problem collection after the odd-cycle theorem of Erdős and Sárközy (card), and deduces Theorem 1 from two cases split by the number of members of congruent to or modulo : Theorem 2 treats the case where that number is at most and gives of order , and Theorem 3 the case where it is at least and gives of order . The author remarks that the class of size cannot be enlarged, since for the set of integers up to divisible by or together with every complete tripartite subgraph of has a class of one vertex, and asks for the largest possible . The library card is source card. The site's commentary credits the paper with the weaker bound .
Covers. The second question, the part tripartite, for every fixed
, with the explicit growth .
Not covered: the first question, on odd cycles, which is the subject of the
pending claims of
Della Pietra
and
Pan; and the
best possible order of , which the paper leaves open.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the argument is the paper's own.
Acceptance. refereed: Discrete Mathematics is a refereed journal; the DOI
record gives volume 202, issue 1-3, pages 227--238, issued May 1999, the paper
link's date, and the print records the paper received on 16 October 1997 and
accepted on 14 September 1998. The site's curator credits the paper with the
second question in the problem's commentary, but labels the problem OPEN, so the
commentary settles nothing and gives no reviewed. The formal-conjectures
statement file (the record link) marks the second question,
erdos_883.parts.ii, as research solved with answer true and cites this
paper, which corroborates the claim and lends it no evidence; the file is a
statement without a formal proof and is not a formalization.