Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 666

../

claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 666, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let QnQ_n be the nn-dimensional hypercube graph (so that QnQ_n has 2n2^n vertices and n2n−1n2^{n-1} edges). Is it true that, for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0, if nn is sufficiently large, every subgraph of QnQ_n with

≥ϵn2n−1\geq \epsilon n2^{n-1}

many edges contains a C6C_6?

Status. DISPROVED (LEAN). The site answers the question with no and credits Chung [Ch92] and Brouwer, Dejter and Thomassen [BDT93] with an edge-partition of QnQ_n into four subgraphs none containing a C6C_6, so a class with a quarter of the edges avoids C6C_6; each paper is recorded as an accepted claim, on the refereed venue and the site's acceptance, on Chung's claim page and the Brouwer--Dejter--Thomassen claim page, from which the frontmatter standing is derived. The site's label is "DISPROVED (LEAN)"; the formalization its Lean qualification refers to is linked on both claim pages and described under Formalization below.

Source. erdosproblems.com/666, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #666, https://www.erdosproblems.com/666.

References.

  • [BDT93] Brouwer, A. E. and Dejter, I. J. and Thomassen, C., Highly symmetric subgraphs of hypercubes. J. Algebraic Combin. 2 (1993), 25-29.
  • [Ch92] Chung, Fan R. K., Subgraphs of a hypercube containing no small even cycles. J. Graph Theory (1992), 273-286.
  • [Er91] Erdős, P., Problems and results in combinatorial analysis and combinatorial number theory. Graph theory, combinatorics, and applications, Vol. 1 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1988) (1991), 397-406.

Formalization. A Lean 4 file in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository, with Aristotle and Alexeev as its formal authors, proves the negation of the statement from the four-part partition and names Chung and Brouwer, Dejter and Thomassen as its informal authors; Alexeev reported it on the site's thread on 6 February 2026. It is a formalization link on both claim pages; the corpus has not built or audited it, so it gives no formalized evidence. The formal-conjectures statement file, tagged research solved, names the lean-proofs development as its formal proof; it states the problem and is not itself a formalization of a result.

Progress

Not yet compiled.

Known Results

Not yet compiled.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.