Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 444

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 444, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let A⊆NA\subseteq\mathbb{N} be infinite and dA(n)d_A(n) count the number of a∈Aa\in A which divide nn. Is it true that, for every kk,

lim sup⁡x→∞max⁡n<xdA(n)(∑n∈A∩[1,x)1n)k=∞?\limsup_{x\to \infty} \frac{\max_{n<x}d_A(n)}{\left(\sum_{n\in A\cap[1,x)}\frac{1}{n}\right)^k}=\infty?

Status. Proved. The site labels the problem PROVED; the Erdős–Sárközy theorem that max⁡n≤xdA(n)\max_{n\le x}d_A(n) exceeds exp⁡(c(log⁡fA(x))2)\exp(c(\log f_A(x))^2) infinitely often, with fA(x)f_A(x) the reciprocal sum, answers the question yes for every kk, as the claim page below records.

Source. erdosproblems.com/444, accessed 2026-09-04. The site cites the problem from Erdős and Graham's 1980 problem book [ErGr80] and credits [ErSa80]. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #444, https://www.erdosproblems.com/444.

References.

Formalization. None recorded.

Current assessment

The question is the site's formulation of 2026-09-04: for an infinite A⊆NA\subseteq\mathbb{N}, whether the largest number of elements of AA dividing a single n<xn<x exceeds every fixed power of ∑a∈A, a<x1/a\sum_{a\in A,\,a<x}1/a along a sequence of xx. The answer is yes.

Erdős and Graham posed the question in their 1980 problem book, p. 88, where they record the k=1k=1 case as proved by Erdős and Sárközy and the general case as something they believed but could not prove (card). The Erdős–Sárközy series on generalized divisor functions settles it: Part I proves lim sup⁡DA(x)/fA(x)=∞\limsup D_A(x)/f_A(x)=\infty for every infinite AA, and Part II (J. Number Theory 15 (1982), 115–136) proves that fA(x)→∞f_A(x)\to\infty implies lim sup⁡DA(x)/exp⁡(c1(log⁡fA(x))2)=∞\limsup D_A(x)/\exp(c_1(\log f_A(x))^2)=\infty, a bound beyond every fixed power of fA(x)f_A(x). The site credits Part IV [ErSa80], whose introduction restates both results and whose own Theorem 2 concerns the smallest yy with DA(y)>ΩfA(x)D_A(y)>\Omega f_A(x) (card). The claim page Erdős and Sárközy records the theorem, the refereed venues and the curator's credit, and the problem's standing derives from it.

Nothing in the question remains open. The true order of DA(x)D_A(x) against fA(x)f_A(x), and the smallest y(x)y(x) with DA(y(x))/fA(x)→∞D_A(y(x))/f_A(x)\to\infty, are the series' further questions and not part of this problem. No formalization is recorded, and this repository has not checked the proofs independently; the account rests on the site page, the problem book, Part IV's introduction and the journal records of Parts I to III.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.