Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 177

../

claims/: The 4 claim pages of Problem 177, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Find the smallest h(d)h(d) such that the following holds. There exists a function f:N→{−1,1}f:\mathbb{N}\to\{-1,1\} such that, for every d≥1d\geq 1,

max⁡Pd∣∑n∈Pdf(n)∣≤h(d),\max_{P_d}\left\lvert \sum_{n\in P_d}f(n)\right\rvert\leq h(d),

where PdP_d ranges over all finite arithmetic progressions with common difference dd.

Status. Open, the site's label as accessed on 2026-09-04 and unchanged, when the problem's proof-claim tab was empty. The site's commentary records h(d)≪d!h(d)\ll d! from Cantor, Erdős, Schreiber and Straus, h(d)→∞h(d)\to\infty from van der Waerden's theorem, Beck's h(d)≤d8+ϵh(d)\le d^{8+\epsilon} for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0 [Be17] and Roth's h(d)≫d1/2h(d)\gg d^{1/2} [Ro64]. Erdős's 1966 report of the construction (printed p. 137) states its bound as L(d)<cdd!L(d)<c^dd!, which is weaker than the site's d!d! by the factor cdc^d. The bounds are recorded as partial claims: the construction on Cantor, Erdős, Schreiber and Straus 1966 (accepted on the journal publication alone), Beck's bound on Beck 2017 (claimed, an edited-volume chapter) and Roth's bound on Roth 1964 (accepted on the refereed publication alone). A claim of 19 September 2026, Korsky 2026, submitted on the site's proof-claim tab of Problem 178 and recorded here as a partial claim, would improve Beck's exponent to 5/2+225/2+2\sqrt2; it is unreviewed. No full claim exists, and the standing derives from the claim pages.

Source. erdosproblems.com/177, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #177, https://www.erdosproblems.com/177.

References.

  • [Be17] Beck, József, A discrepancy problem: balancing infinite dimensional vectors. Number theory-Diophantine problems, uniform distribution and applications (2017), 61-82.
  • [Er66] Erdős, Pál, Remarks on number theory. V. Extremal problems in number theory. II. Mat. Lapok (1966), 135-155.
  • [Ro64] Roth, K. F., Remark concerning integer sequences. Acta Arith. 9 (1964), 257-260.

Formalization. None recorded.

Current assessment

The question (site formulation). The statement above; OPEN, with no last-edited date shown. The commentary, in this page's words: Cantor, Erdős, Schreiber and Straus [Er66] proved that h(d)≪d!h(d)\ll d! is attainable; van der Waerden's theorem implies h(d)→∞h(d)\to\infty; Beck [Be17] showed that h(d)≤d8+ϵh(d)\le d^{8+\epsilon} is attainable for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0; and Roth's discrepancy lower bound [Ro64] implies h(d)≫d1/2h(d)\gg d^{1/2}. The proof-claim tab was empty on 2026-10-07.

Claims. The four claim pages named under Status record the bounds. The construction of 1966 gives h(d)<cdd!h(d)<c^dd!, so h(d)h(d) is finite for every dd; Erdős's report prints no proof beyond the antisymmetry remark. Roth's 1964 theorem gives, inside [1,N][1,N], a progression of difference at most N1/2N^{1/2} with discrepancy of order N1/4N^{1/4}, so no coloring has max⁡Pd∣∑f∣=O(dp)\max_{P_d}\lvert\sum f\rvert=O(d^p) for p<1/2p<1/2; the inference to h(d)h(d) is the site's. Beck's 2017 chapter gives h(d)≤d8+ϵh(d)\le d^{8+\epsilon}, and Korsky's manuscript of September 2026 claims h(d)≪d5/2+22h(d)\ll d^{5/2+2\sqrt2} by a weighted refinement of Beck's method, with the mathematical insights attributed by its author to GPT Astra. So d1/2≪h(d)≪d8+ϵd^{1/2}\ll h(d)\ll d^{8+\epsilon} on the accepted and claimed-but-published record, and h(d)≪d5/2+22h(d)\ll d^{5/2+2\sqrt2} if Korsky's claim holds.

Results without a claim page. Van der Waerden's theorem implies h(d)→∞h(d)\to\infty: a coloring with bounded sums on every progression would have, for each dd, no monochromatic progression of length exceeding h(d)h(d) and difference dd, against the theorem. Roth's bound supersedes this unquantified growth, so it gets no page. Erdős's 1966 paper also proves, in its Section I.9, that the minimax G(n)G(n) of ∣∑k≤mφ(a+kd)∣\lvert\sum_{k\le m}\varphi(a+kd)\rvert over progressions inside [1,n][1,n] is O(n1/2)O(n^{1/2}), a bound on a different quantity that settles no instance of this problem.

Remaining gaps. The order of h(d)h(d) is open between the exponents 1/21/2 and 88; the sharper upper exponent rests on an unrefereed manuscript hosted on a file-sharing service. Proof coverage is at statement level throughout, and nothing is independently reviewed by this project.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.