Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 899
claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 899, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let be an infinite set such that $\lvert A\cap {1,\ldots,N}\rvert=o(N)$. Is it true that
Status. The site labels the problem PROVED (LEAN): the answer is yes. The
accepted claim is Ruzsa's 1978 theorem, which the site credits with the proof,
recorded on
its claim page
with the curator's acceptance as its evidence; the label's Lean mark refers to a
Lean development of 2026 in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository that declares
itself a formalization of Ruzsa's proof, linked on the claim page; that file is
not among the Lean the corpus has built and audited, so no formalized evidence
is listed. The sumset analogue is
Problem 245.
Source. erdosproblems.com/899, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #899, https://www.erdosproblems.com/899.
References.
- [Er82e] Erdős, Paul, Some of my favourite problems which recently have been solved. (1982), 59-79 (MR 690096); the site's source for the problem.
- [Ru78] Ruzsa, I. Z., On the cardinality of and . (1978), 933-938. The site's reference omits the venue: Combinatorics (Keszthely, 1976), Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 18, North-Holland (1978).
Formalization. Statement in
formal-conjectures,
linked at the revision of 2026-09-18 that last changed the file, marked solved
with a formal_proof link to the development in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs
repository listed on the claim page; neither file is among the Lean the corpus
has built and audited.
Current assessment
Settled by Ruzsa's 1978 theorem, accepted on the curator's credit. The site
formulation above asks whether an infinite set of density zero always has a
difference set whose counting function is infinitely often arbitrarily larger
than the set's own. The answer is yes: Ruzsa [Ru78] proved that the ratio of the
two counting functions has for every such set, and the site's
curator credits him with the proof. The result is recorded on
the claim page
as an accepted full claim with reviewed as its only evidence: the paper
appeared in a colloquium proceedings volume, and no evidence that the volume was
refereed is recorded, so no refereed is listed. The Lean development in Boris
Alexeev's lean-proofs repository that declares itself a formalization of Ruzsa's
proof, and the formal-conjectures statement file that points to it, are linked
on the claim page; neither is among the Lean the corpus has built and audited,
so the site's Lean mark gives no formalized evidence. No forum claim, release
item or lead names the problem. The sumset analogue, with in place
of , is Problem 245.