Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Bounded degree graphs and hypergraphs with no full rainbow matchings

../

theorem_11: Wdowinski's theorem that for every integer Delta >= 2 some bipartite graph with a list assignment of maximum color degree Delta and all lists of size exactly Delta has no proper list edge-coloring, so Galvin's theorem does not extend to the color degree setting.

theorem_2: Wdowinski's theorem that for all integers r >= 1 and Delta >= 2 some edge-colored r-graph of maximum degree Delta has every color class of size at least r Delta - 1 and no full rainbow matching, so the bound r Delta in the Aharoni--Berger--Meshulam condition cannot be lowered.

theorem_3: Wdowinski's theorem that for all integers 1 <= t <= r and Delta >= 2 some edge-colored t-simple, r-partite r-graph of maximum degree Delta has every color class of size at least r(Delta - 1) + t - 1 and no full rainbow matching.

theorem_7: Wdowinski's three-part theorem giving properly edge-colored multigraphs with no full rainbow matching whose color classes have size at least chi' - 1 for any given multigraph H of maximum degree Delta >= 2 and chromatic index chi' (chi' when H has at most 2 Delta - 1 edges), Delta + 1 for bipartite simple graphs, and Delta + 2 with chromatic index Delta when Delta is 3 or 0 mod 4, which disproves Conjectures 5 and 6 of Delcourt and Postle.


Ronen Wdowinski, “Bounded degree graphs and hypergraphs with no full rainbow matchings,” arXiv:2401.06029, version 2 (stamped 18 December 2025). The manuscript title page is dated 19 December 2025; these are recorded as separate dates. The arXiv record gives the journal version as European Journal of Combinatorics 133 (2026), article 104316, DOI 10.1016/j.ejc.2025.104316; the statements below were checked against arXiv v2 only.

General edge-colored multi-hypergraphs

A multi-hypergraph has a vertex set and an edge multiset; parallel edges are allowed. An rr-graph has every edge of size rr, and its vertex degrees count edge multiplicity. If E1,…,EnE_1,\ldots,E_n partition the edge multiset, a full rainbow matching is a matching containing exactly one edge from each color class.

Theorem 1 (Aharoni–Berger–Meshulam) says that an rr-graph of maximum degree Δ\Delta has a full rainbow matching whenever

∑i∈I∣Ei∣≥rΔ(∣I∣−1)+1for every I⊆[n].\sum_{i\in I}|E_i|\geq r\Delta(|I|-1)+1 \quad\text{for every }I\subseteq[n].

In particular, ∣Ei∣≥rΔ|E_i|\geq r\Delta for every class suffices. Theorem 2 shows sharpness for every integer r≥1r\geq1 and Δ≥2\Delta\geq2: there is an rr-graph of maximum degree Δ\Delta with ∣Ei∣≥rΔ−1|E_i|\geq r\Delta-1 for every class and no full rainbow matching.

Theorem 3 gives the corresponding simple-intersection construction. For 1≤t≤r1\leq t\leq r and Δ≥2\Delta\geq2, there is a tt-simple, rr-partite rr-graph of maximum degree Δ\Delta with

∣Ei∣≥r(Δ−1)+t−1|E_i|\geq r(\Delta-1)+t-1

for every class and no full rainbow matching. Here tt-simple means that any two distinct edges meet in at most tt vertices, with parallel edges counted as distinct; t=1t=1 is the linear case.

The fractional Hall statement used to derive Theorem 1 is Theorem 14:

ν∗(⋃i∈IEi)>r(∣I∣−1)for every I⊆[n]\nu^*\left(\bigcup_{i\in I}E_i\right)>r(|I|-1) \quad\text{for every }I\subseteq[n]

implies a full rainbow matching, where ν∗\nu^* is the fractional matching number.

Properly edge-colored graphs

In a proper edge-coloring each color class is a matching. Theorem 7 has three parts. (1) Let HH be a multigraph of maximum degree Δ≥2\Delta\geq2 and chromatic index χ′\chi'. Then some multigraph GG associated with HH, with the same maximum degree Δ\Delta and the same chromatic index χ′\chi', has a proper edge-coloring whose classes all satisfy ∣Ei∣≥χ′−1|E_i|\geq\chi'-1 and which has no full rainbow matching. If ∣E(H)∣≤2Δ−1|E(H)|\leq2\Delta-1, the classes can instead satisfy ∣Ei∣≥χ′|E_i|\geq\chi'.

(2) For every Δ≥2\Delta\geq2, there is a bipartite graph of maximum degree Δ\Delta with a proper edge-coloring whose classes all have size at least Δ+1\Delta+1 and which has no full rainbow matching.

(3) For every integer Δ≥3\Delta\geq3 with Δ≡3\Delta\equiv3 or 0(mod4)0\pmod4, some multigraph whose maximum degree and chromatic index both equal Δ\Delta has a proper edge-coloring whose classes all have size at least Δ+2\Delta+2 and which has no full rainbow matching. If Δ∈{2m−1,2m}\Delta\in\{2^m-1,2^m\} for an integer m≥2m\geq2, the multigraph can be chosen simple.

Proposition 23 (PDF p. 10) gives the exact cyclic example: for every even integer n≥2n\geq2, Kn,nK_{n,n} has a proper edge-coloring by nn colors, each color class a perfect matching of size nn, that admits no full rainbow matching. The construction colors xiyjx_i y_j by i+ji+j in Zn\mathbb Z_n; the paper notes that the proposition equivalently gives, for every even n≥2n\geq2, a Latin square of order nn with no transversal.

List edge-colorings

For a list assignment LL on the edges of HH, the maximum color degree of (H,L)(H,L) is the largest, over colors cc, of the maximum degree of the edges whose lists contain cc. Theorem 11 (p. 4): for every integer Δ≥2\Delta\geq2, some bipartite graph HH with a list assignment LL of maximum color degree Δ\Delta and ∣L(e)∣=Δ|L(e)|=\Delta for every edge ee has no proper LL-coloring, so Galvin's theorem has no color degree version. The proof (Section 5, pp. 13--16) reduces list edge-colorings to full rainbow matchings in an auxiliary properly edge-colored graph and proves the rainbow form, Theorem 28 (p. 13).

The selected statements are from physical/printed PDF pp. 1–4, 6, 9–11, 13 and 14: Theorems 1–2 on p. 2, Theorems 3 and 7 on p. 3, Theorem 11 on p. 4, Theorem 14 on p. 6, Theorems 18–19 on p. 9, Propositions 21 and 23 on p. 10, Propositions 25–26 on p. 11, Theorem 28 on p. 13, and construction context on p. 14. Proofs and construction figures are not transcribed in full.

Results.

  • Theorem 2 (p. 2): for all r≥1r\geq1 and Δ≥2\Delta\geq2, an edge-colored rr-graph of maximum degree Δ\Delta with all classes of size at least rΔ−1r\Delta-1 and no full rainbow matching.
  • Theorem 3 (p. 3): the tt-simple, rr-partite version with classes of size at least r(Δ−1)+t−1r(\Delta-1)+t-1.
  • Theorem 7 (p. 3): properly edge-colored counterexamples, disproving Conjectures 5 and 6 of Delcourt and Postle.
  • Theorem 11 (p. 4): no color degree version of Galvin's theorem.

For explicit compilation-level transversal context only, see Edmonds's transversal and matroid-partition source. The inspected Wdowinski source does not cite that linked 1965 source. This selected statement digest carries no complete-proof credit.

Bears on. None: the paper names no Erdős problem, and no numbered problem page of the corpus is stated in terms of full rainbow matchings or list edge-colorings under degree conditions.

The copy read for this card is the arXiv v2 PDF. The arXiv record (https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06029, read 2026-10-07) names the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.