Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Lovasz 1968 graphs set systems

../

theorem_2: Lovász's counting characterization of set systems whose associated multigraph has no non-trivial circuit, generalizing v = e + c for forests.

theorem_3: Lovász's vertex count for set systems whose simple circuits all have length 2 and whose edges pairwise share at most two points, answering a question of Erdős.

theorem_4: Lovász's proof of a conjecture of Erdős: a system of triples on h with at least |h| - 1 triples contains a simple circuit of length at least three.

theorem_5: Proves by induction that the one-extra-vertex condition for every subsystem guarantees a two-coloring with no monochromatic edge.

theorem_6: Lovász's direct construction, for given natural numbers k, n and s, of a uniform k-system whose non-trivial circuits are longer than s and whose chromatic number is n.


László Lovász, “Graphs and set systems,” in Beiträge zur Graphentheorie, edited by Horst Sachs, Heinz-Jürgen Voß, and Hansjoachim Walther, B. G. Teubner, Leipzig (1968), 99–106.

The paper studies several extensions of graph-theoretic notions to finite set systems. A set system's circuits are those of the multigraph formed by complete graphs on its edges (p. 99). Theorem 2 (p. 100) characterizes the systems without non-trivial circuits by a vertex count; Theorem 3 (p. 100) gives a vertex count, through components and lobes, for systems whose simple circuits all have length 2, answering a question of Erdős; and Theorem 4 (p. 102), which the paper says Theorem 3 implies, is Erdős's conjecture that at least ∣h∣−1|h|-1 triples on hh force a simple circuit of length at least 3. Theorem 6 (p. 103) constructs, for given kk, nn, ss, a uniform kk-system whose non-trivial circuits are longer than ss and whose chromatic number is nn, a direct construction for the probabilistic theorem of Erdős and Hajnal.

For the result relevant here, Lovász calls a set system a forest if every subsystem with vertex set h′h' and edge family H′H' satisfies

∣h′∣≥∣H′∣+1,|h'|\geq |H'|+1,

a condition read for nonempty h′h', since the empty subsystem cannot meet it. Theorem 5, which the paper introduces as a conjecture of Erdős, proves by induction that every such forest is two-colorable. Apply it in the setting of Problem 1022 to a finite family F\mathcal F whose members have size at least 22 and for which fewer than ∣X∣|X| members lie in each nonempty vertex set XX. The empty family has property B trivially. Otherwise, for any nonempty subfamily K\mathcal K, take X=⋃KX=\bigcup\mathcal K to get ∣X∣≥∣K∣+1|X|\geq|\mathcal K|+1; subsystems with no edges satisfy the forest inequality automatically on every nonempty vertex set.

Lovász's 1973 paper Coverings and colorings of hypergraphs restates the result as its Theorem 3 and explicitly cites this paper as reference [2]. This identification is distinct from the site's bibliographic key [Lo68], which is Lovász's different paper On covering of graphs. The claim that [Lo68] does not contain the asserted coloring result remains attributed to the site; this compilation verified the result's presence in Graphs and set systems rather than independently checking the contents of On covering of graphs.

The copy read for this card is a complete scan of the published contribution, printed pp. 99–106. It was downloaded from a public scan of the 1968 proceedings. The scan's title, author, printed pagination, and placement in the complete volume identify the source. No notice is printed in the scan (its pp. 1--2 and 7--8 carry no copyright or license line); the hosting page (https://korandi.org/beitrage.html, read 2026-10-02) states no copyright, license or terms and names the publisher B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft Leipzig (1968), and the volume has no DOI; the term is unstated.

Sources.

Bears on. #1022: Theorem 5 gives property B to every finite family of sets of size at least 22 in which fewer than ∣X∣|X| members lie inside each nonempty set XX, that is, the problem's hypothesis with constant 11 for every t≥2t\geq2. It does not by itself decide the problem, which asks for constants ct→∞c_t\to\infty.

Results.

Read status. Claims checked for Theorems 2 to 6: each statement was read clause by clause on the print. The proof of Theorem 5, the result the corpus consumes, was rewritten and checked on its result page by its author, with no independent review recorded; the other proofs were read but not checked step by step, and Theorem 2's proof is not printed in the paper.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.