Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source scope. Published Section 3, p. 272 (PDF), asks for the weighted version of the deletion proof. This page supplies the numerical step, with a parameter depending on the bias.

Statement. Fix 0<p≤1/20<p\le1/2 and put t=p/(1−p)t=p/(1-p). For 0<δ≤t/400<\delta\le t/40, nonempty families have one of the following slice choices: either a growth step with product at least 1+δ1+\delta times the old product, or the widening step (F1,G0∩G1)(\mathcal F_1,\mathcal G_0\cap\mathcal G_1) with product at least

bp,δ=1−δt−8δ2t2>0b_{p,\delta}=1-\frac\delta t-\frac{8\delta^2}{t^2}>0

times the old product. The growth choices are the two 11-slices or (F0,G0∪G1)(\mathcal F_0,\mathcal G_0\cup\mathcal G_1), with the same forbidden interval changes as in definitions. The families may first be interchanged.

Proof. Write f=μp(F)f=\mu_p(\mathcal F) and g=μp(G)g=\mu_p(\mathcal G); slice measures have one fewer ambient coordinate. If f1g1>(1+δ)fgf_1g_1>(1+\delta)fg, use the first growth choice. Otherwise interchange the families so a=f1/f≤b=g1/ga=f_1/f\le b=g_1/g. Thus a≤1+δa\le\sqrt{1+\delta}. If f0u>(1+δ)fgf_0u>(1+\delta)fg, where u=μp(G0∪G1)u=\mu_p(\mathcal G_0\cup\mathcal G_1), use the second growth choice. We bound the remaining case.

Set y=a−1y=a-1, z=b−1z=b-1, and x=u/g−1x=u/g-1. The slice identity and inclusion-exclusion give

f0f=1−ty,g0g=1−tz,μp(G0∩G1)g=1+(1−t)z−x.(1)\frac{f_0}f=1-ty,\quad \frac{g_0}g=1-tz,\quad \frac{\mu_p(\mathcal G_0\cap\mathcal G_1)}g =1+(1-t)z-x. \tag{1}

Since u≥max⁡(g0,g1)≥gu\ge\max(g_0,g_1)\ge g, we have x≥0x\ge0. Failure of the second growth test implies 1−ty≤1+δ1-ty\le1+\delta, hence y≥−δ/ty\ge-\delta/t. Also y≤1+δ−1≤δ/2y\le\sqrt{1+\delta}-1\le\delta/2 and z≥yz\ge y. The inequalities u≥g1,g0u\ge g_1,g_0 give

(1−ty)(1+z)≤1+δ,(1−ty)(1−tz)≤1+δ.(1-ty)(1+z)\le1+\delta,\qquad (1-ty)(1-tz)\le1+\delta.

Consequently,

−δ/t≤z≤2δ,0≤x≤δ+ty1−ty≤2δ,x≤δ+ty+2δ2,y+z≥−δ/t+tyz.(2)-\delta/t\le z\le2\delta,\quad 0\le x\le\frac{\delta+ty}{1-ty}\le2\delta,\quad x\le\delta+ty+2\delta^2,\quad y+z\ge-\delta/t+t yz. \tag{2}

For the third inequality, subtract δ+ty\delta+ty from the fraction: if y≤0y\le0 the difference is nonpositive; if y>0y>0 it is at most (δ/2)2δ≤δ2(\delta/2)2\delta\le\delta^2. All denominators are positive under the stated bound on δ\delta.

Using (1) and then (2), the widening product divided by fgfg is

(1+y)(1+(1−t)z−x)≥1−δ+(1−t)(y+z)+(1−t)yz−xy−2δ2≥1−δ/t+(1−t2)yz−xy−2δ2≥1−δ/t−8δ2/t2.\begin{aligned} (1+y)(1+(1-t)z-x) &\ge1-\delta+(1-t)(y+z)+(1-t)yz-xy-2\delta^2\\ &\ge1-\delta/t+(1-t^2)yz-xy-2\delta^2\\ &\ge1-\delta/t-8\delta^2/t^2. \end{aligned}

The last line uses ∣y∣≤δ/t|y|\le\delta/t, ∣z∣≤2δ/t|z|\le2\delta/t, 0≤x≤2δ0\le x\le2\delta, and 0<t≤10<t\le1. This also proves that the chosen product is positive. □\square

Dependencies. definitions.