Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Published p. 262, Theorem 1.5, and Section 3, p. 272 (PDF). The source gives an outline; the branching inequality and both stopping cases are expanded here, including the fixed-level reduction needed for complements.
Statement. Fix and . There is such that families avoiding an integer cross intersection satisfy
whenever
Constants may be chosen uniformly for in a compact subset of , with the same positive buffer . Thus this gives the source's two open parameter ranges for , after decreasing the buffer and taking sufficiently large.
Proof. First suppose , and put and . Apply the interval deletion algorithm of theorem_1_4, using weighted_deletion_inequality in place of its unweighted step. With fixed sufficiently small , each growth step gains and each widening step retains . The interval invariant, termination, and positivity are unchanged.
Let be the two step counts and the final ambient size. Suppose the initial product is at least . As in the unweighted proof, logarithms of the gains and the final upper bound one imply
Here and below the constants can be enlarged without changing the notation. The final product is at least . These estimates follow from Taylor bounds on a compact parameter interval; all constants are uniform when is bounded away from zero.
If the procedure stops at , its forbidden width is and . Hence (3) gives for small enough . All final cross intersections exceed . Theorem 3.1 and the entropy bound give a final product at most , contradicting the lower bound when is small. Zero ambient size is already impossible for positive families avoiding intersection zero.
If it stops at and , then . Using and (3),
Furthermore in the first expression implies for sufficiently small . All cross intersections are less than . Apply the biased small-intersection bound in product_measure_separation to the actual coordinates, with the fixed proportional gap supplied by (4). It gives an upper bound , where depends only on . Taking is a contradiction. This proves (1) for and large .
Now let . Fix . Under , the total measure of sets whose size is outside is at most , by the proved concentration estimate. If a family has measure at most twice this quantity, (1) already holds. Otherwise its typical-size part retains at least half its measure. Choose one size in that part of , and one size in that part of , each carrying at least of its part's measure.
Complement these two uniform families. For their members,
They therefore avoid . By (2) and ,
Their measures equal the original level measures exactly. The already proved case at bias bounds their product by . Since the original product is at most times that level product, it too has a fixed exponential gap. This proves the second range. Taking common compact bounds on and proves the asserted uniformity.
For the finitely many remaining , each admissible is realized by the full cube and every point has positive product measure. Thus no avoiding pair has measure product one. There are finitely many pairs and integers ; compactness of the allowed biases, or a smaller constant for a fixed bias, includes these cases.
Precision. Complementation of arbitrary nonuniform families does not send a fixed intersection to a fixed intersection. The typical-level argument above supplies that missing step. The weighted widening factor has first-order loss , not the unweighted loss ; its stopping estimate is correspondingly (3).
Dependencies. weighted_deletion_inequality, theorem_1_4, theorem_3_1, product_measure_separation, entropy_estimates.