Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

A chromatic graph GnG_n is a set of nn points with every pair joined by an edge colored red or blue, that is, a two-coloring of the edges of KnK_n; a monochromatic triangle is a set of three points whose three joining edges have one color; two triangles are disjoint when they share no point; and μ(Gn)\mu(G_n) is the largest number of mutually disjoint monochromatic triangles in GnG_n (printed p. 259). [x][x] is the greatest integer not exceeding xx.

Theorem (printed p. 259). For every chromatic graph GnG_n on nn points,

(1)[13n]−1 ≤ μ(Gn) ≤ [13n];(1)\qquad \Bigl[\tfrac13n\Bigr]-1\ \le\ \mu(G_n)\ \le\ \Bigl[\tfrac13n\Bigr];

and if n≡2(mod3)n\equiv2\pmod3 and n≥8n\ge8, then

(2)μ(Gn)=[13n].(2)\qquad \mu(G_n)=\Bigl[\tfrac13n\Bigr].

The note adds (p. 261) that the reader can construct examples showing (1) best possible whenever n≥3n\ge3 and (2) does not apply, and prints none.

In the problem's notation (an observation made here). Problem 1015's f(n,3)f(n,3), the largest number of vertices that some two-coloring of KnK_n leaves uncovered by any family of disjoint monochromatic triangles, is the maximum of n−3μ(Gn)n-3\mu(G_n). By (2), f(n,3)=2f(n,3)=2 for n≡2(mod3)n\equiv2\pmod3 and n≥8n\ge8; by (1), f(n,3)≤n−3[13n]+3f(n,3)\le n-3[\tfrac13n]+3, which is 33 for n≡0(mod3)n\equiv0\pmod3, 44 for n≡1(mod3)n\equiv1\pmod3 and 55 for n≡2(mod3)n\equiv2\pmod3, with equality exactly for the colorings of the unprinted remark; (2) lowers the last value to 22 once n≥8n\ge8, and at n=5n=5 the pentagon coloring (Figure 1) has no monochromatic triangle, so all five vertices stay uncovered and f(5,3)=5f(5,3)=5. For n≢2(mod3)n\not\equiv2\pmod3 the k=3k=3 case of the Figure 6 coloring of Theorem 6 of Burr, Erdős and Spencer (two vertices joined by a red edge, blue to all others, all other pairs red) supplies the colorings with μ(Gn)=[13n]−1\mu(G_n)=[\tfrac13n]-1; with (1) and (2) this gives f(n,3)=2+rem(n−2,3)f(n,3)=2+\mathrm{rem}(n-2,3), that is 22, 33 and 44 for n≡2n\equiv2, 00 and 1(mod3)1\pmod3, for every n≥4n\ge4 other than 55 (the problem takes k<nk<n). This is the k=3k=3 case of that theorem's formula, which the theorem itself asserts only for sufficiently large nn. The maximum over n≠5n\ne5 is 44, the site's "f(3)=4f(3)=4, at least for n≥8n\geq8".

Source. J. W. Moon, Disjoint triangles in chromatic graphs, Math. Mag. 39 (1966), no. 5, 259--261; the Theorem, the definitions and facts A and B on printed p. 259 (PDF p. 2 of the archive's PDF), the proof on pp. 259--261 (PDF pp. 2--4), the remark on sharpness on p. 261 (PDF p. 4), read on the page images (the text layer garbles μ\mu, the brackets and the inequality signs). The edition read is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the definitions, facts A and B and the closing remarks were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof was read in full on the page images and its three steps were followed; the claims made about Figures 2--4 in the case n=8n=8 were read as printed and not re-derived. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pages 259--261. Facts A and B (p. 259, cited to Greenwood and Gleason): a point with three edges of one color forces a monochromatic triangle, so every G6G_6 has one (A), and a G5G_5 with none has exactly two edges of each color at every point (B). For (1): the upper bound counts points; if a maximal family of disjoint monochromatic triangles had k≤[13n]−2k\le[\tfrac13n]-2 members, at least six points would be uncovered and A would give a further disjoint monochromatic triangle. For (2), first n=8n=8: μ(G8)≥1\mu(G_8)\ge1 by A, and if μ(G8)=1\mu(G_8)=1 then B, applied to the five points outside a monochromatic triangle, forces the pentagon coloring on them (Figure 1); if a triangle point xx and two pentagon points aa, cc form a blue triangle, B applied to the other five points forces two red edges from the pentagon point bb to the remaining triangle points, giving two disjoint monochromatic triangles (Figure 2); otherwise each triangle point is red to at least three consecutive pentagon points, two triangle points share at least two such pentagon points, and two configurations remain: the first (Figure 3) contains two disjoint red triangles, and in the second (Figure 4) the remaining triangle point xx must also be red to one of the pentagon points aa, cc, which again gives two disjoint red triangles. So μ(G8)=2\mu(G_8)=2. Then, for n=3h+2n=3h+2 with h≥3h\ge3, a family of h−1h-1 disjoint monochromatic triangles leaves five points, which together with any one triangle of the family form a G8G_8 containing two disjoint monochromatic triangles; exchanging gives hh triangles.

Dependencies

Within the note: facts A and B (p. 259), which the note calls well known, citing as an example Greenwood and Gleason, Combinatorial relations and chromatic graphs, Canad. J. Math. 7 (1955), 1--7, not held. The sharpness of the lower bound in (1) is the author's unprinted remark (p. 261); the corpus reads it off the k=3k=3 case of the Figure 6 coloring of Burr, Erdős and Spencer, Theorem 6.

Bears on

  • Problem 1015: the k=3k=3 result the site credits to the note. Part (2) is the sentence Erdős restates in item 9 of the 1971 problem paper (printed p. 100); part (1) bounds the uncovered vertices by 33 for n≡0n\equiv0 and by 44 for n≡1(mod3)n\equiv1\pmod3, so the theorem leaves at most four uncovered for every n≠5n\ne5; at n=5n=5 the pentagon coloring (Figure 1) leaves all five uncovered. The note poses no question for KkK_k.