Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Shorey 2016 arithmetic properties blocks consecutive integers

../

theorem_3_1: Shorey and Tijdeman's lower bound for the greatest prime factor of n(n+1)...(n+k-1) when n is very large compared with k: for k >= 2, n > exp exp k and n sufficiently large, P(n,k) >> k log_2 n log_3 n / log_4 n.

theorem_6_1: Shorey and Tijdeman's unconditional lower bound for the greatest m-th powerfree part of n(n+1)...(n+k-1): for m >= 3 it is

_{k,m} (log n)^{(k-1)/(2m-1)}.

theorem_8_1: Shorey and Tijdeman's theorem that the abc conjecture gives, for n >= k >= 2, m >= 2 and every epsilon > 0, Q_m(n,k) >> n^{k-1-1/(m-1)-epsilon}, R(n,k) >> n^{k-1-epsilon} and P(n,k) >= (k-1+o_k(1)) log n.

theorem_8_2: Shorey and Tijdeman's theorem that, under the abc conjecture, for 0 < epsilon < 1/2 and n > k^{3/2} there is k_1 depending only on epsilon with P(n,k) >= (1/2 - epsilon) k log n for all k >= k_1.

theorem_9_1: Shorey and Tijdeman's theorem that Baker's explicit abc conjecture rules out positive integers n_1 < n_2 with n_1 + i and n_2 + i having the same prime divisors for i = 0, 1, 2, so that it implies the Erdős-Woods conjecture for every k >= 3.


Shorey, Tarlok N. and Tijdeman, Rob, Arithmetic properties of blocks of consecutive integers. In: From Arithmetic to Zeta-Functions, Springer (2016), 455--471. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28203-9_27. The copy read for this card is the arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.05438v1 (16 December 2016). The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1612.05438), every other right reserved.

This survey concerns N=n(n+1)⋯(n+k−1)N=n(n+1)\cdots(n+k-1), introduced with n>k≥3n>k\ge3 (p. 1), and the four functions P(n,k)P(n,k) (greatest prime factor), ω(n,k)\omega(n,k) (number of distinct prime factors), R(n,k)R(n,k) (greatest squarefree divisor) and Qm(n,k)Q_m(n,k) (greatest mm-th powerfree part) (p. 2); each theorem states its own range. It collects the best known unconditional bounds (Sections 3--6) and those available under the abc conjecture (Section 8). The new contributions the authors list (p. 2) are Theorem 3.1, a lower bound for P(n,k)P(n,k) when nn is very large compared with kk; Theorem 6.1, an improved lower bound for Qm(n,k)Q_m(n,k) for given kk and mm; Theorem 8.1, a new approach to the powerfree-part bounds under abc; Theorem 8.2, a new estimate for P(n,k)P(n,k) under abc for general nn and kk; and Theorem 9.1, the proof that the explicit abc conjecture implies the Erdős-Woods conjecture for every k≥3k\ge3. The Erdős-Woods conjecture, stated in Section 1 and treated in Sections 7 and 9, asserts that some kk admits no positive integers n1<n2n_1<n_2 with n1+in_1+i and n2+in_2+i having exactly the same prime divisors for i=0,…,k−1i=0,\ldots,k-1. Classical results quoted include Sylvester's theorem, Laishram and Shorey's P(n,k)>1.8kP(n,k)>1.8k for n>kn>k with an explicit exception list, and Nair and Shorey's P(n,k)>4.42kP(n,k)>4.42k for n>4kn>4k (p. 3).

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05438.

Read status: claims checked for Theorems 3.1, 6.1, 8.1, 8.2 and 9.1, Lemmas 3.1 and 8.1, Conjectures 8.1 and 9.1, and the quoted bounds of Section 3, read clause by clause on the page images of the arXiv preprint; the proof of Theorem 9.1 followed, the proofs of the others followed for structure. The cited inputs (Matveev's estimate, the bound (8) of De Weger and Van de Woestijne, Shorey's bound (3), and Laishram and Shorey's consequence (22) of Baker's conjecture) are not proved in the paper and were not read. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #850: Theorem 9.1 (p. 13) proves, assuming Baker's explicit abc conjecture (Conjecture 9.1), that no positive integers n1<n2n_1<n_2 have n1+in_1+i and n2+in_2+i with the same prime divisors for i=0,1,2i=0,1,2; read for positive integers, this is a conditional no to the problem's question, and it gives no unconditional answer.

Results.

  • Theorem 3.1 (p. 4): for k≥2k\ge2, n>exp⁡2kn>\exp_2k and nn sufficiently large, P(n,k)≫klog⁡2n log⁡3n/log⁡4nP(n,k)\gg k\log_2n\,\log_3n/\log_4n.
  • Theorem 6.1 (p. 8): for m≥3m\ge3, unconditionally, Qm(n,k)≫k,m(log⁡n)(k−1)/(2m−1)Q_m(n,k)\gg_{k,m}(\log n)^{(k-1)/(2m-1)}.
  • Theorem 8.1 (p. 10): for integers n≥k≥2n\ge k\ge2 and m≥2m\ge2, the abc conjecture gives, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, Qm(n,k)≫ε,k,mnk−1−1m−1−εQ_m(n,k)\gg_{\varepsilon,k,m}n^{k-1-\frac1{m-1}-\varepsilon}, R(n,k)≫ε,knk−1−εR(n,k)\gg_{\varepsilon,k}n^{k-1-\varepsilon} and P(n,k)≥(k−1+ok(1))log⁡nP(n,k)\ge(k-1+o_k(1))\log n.
  • Theorem 8.2 (p. 11): for 0<ε<1/20<\varepsilon<1/2 and n>k3/2n>k^{3/2}, the abc conjecture gives k1=k1(ε)k_1=k_1(\varepsilon) with P(n,k)≥(12−ε)klog⁡nP(n,k)\ge(\frac12-\varepsilon)k\log n for all k≥k1k\ge k_1.
  • Theorem 9.1 (p. 13): assuming Baker's explicit abc conjecture (Conjecture 9.1), no positive integers n1<n2n_1<n_2 have n1+in_1+i and n2+in_2+i with the same prime divisors for i=0,1,2i=0,1,2; hence the Erdős-Woods conjecture holds with k=3k=3, and so for every k≥3k\ge3.
  • Quoted bounds (Section 3, p. 3), not results of the paper: Laishram and Shorey, P(n,k)>1.8kP(n,k)>1.8k for n>kn>k outside a finite explicit exception list, P(n,k)>1.97kP(n,k)>1.97k for n>k+13n>k+13, and P(n,k)>2kP(n,k)>2k for n>max⁡(k+13,279k/262)n>\max(k+13,279k/262); Nair and Shorey, P(n,k)>4.42kP(n,k)>4.42k for n>4kn>4k.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.