Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Lemma 3.2. Fix an integer n≥1n\ge1 and complex inputs Z0,…,Zn−1Z_0,\ldots,Z_{n-1} in the closed unit disk. Each has a phase djd_j of modulus one with Zj=dj∣Zj∣Z_j=d_j|Z_j| (the phase of 00 is set to 11), and the half-sum of the defects is

μ=12∑j=0n−1(1−∣Zj∣).\mu=\frac12\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}(1-|Z_j|).

There are ηj∈{dj,−dj}\eta_j\in\{d_j,-d_j\} such that

sup⁡t∈T∣∑j=0n−1(ηj−Zj)e(jt)∣≤C(1+μlog⁡(80n/μ))\sup_{t\in\mathbb T}\left|\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}(\eta_j-Z_j)\mathrm e(jt)\right| \le C\left(1+\sqrt{\mu\log(80n/\mu)}\right)

where CC is absolute. When μ=0\mu=0 the square-root term is taken to be zero, and in that case the error can be made zero. When every ZjZ_j is real the ηj\eta_j are signs, and shifting the frequency range from 0,…,n−10,\ldots,n-1 to any nn consecutive integers changes nothing.

Source. OpenAI, Ultraflat real Littlewood polynomials, release folder preprints/Ultraflat-real-Littlewood-polynomials-October-5-2026; TeX sections/rounding.tex lines 25--41 (label lem:complex-rounding), PDF pp. 4--5; proof p. 5 (sections/rounding.tex lines 43--115). Read 2026-10-07.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, and the statement of Lemma 3.1 it rests on, were read clause by clause in the TeX source. The proof was read for its structure (below) and no step was checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Section 3 (p. 5). With pj=(1−∣Zj∣)/2∈[0,1/2]p_j=(1-|Z_j|)/2\in[0,1/2], so ∑pj=μ\sum p_j=\mu, the manuscript forms a real matrix with R=40nR=40n rows from the real and imaginary parts of dje(jtℓ)d_j\mathrm e(jt_\ell) on the grid tℓ=ℓ/(20n)t_\ell=\ell/(20n) and rounds pp to a vector p′∈{0,1}np'\in\{0,1\}^n by a dyadic partial-coloring scheme: truncate pp to the grid 2−JZ2^{-J}\mathbb Z with n2−J≤1n2^{-J}\le1 (cost at most 11), then at each stage h=J,…,1h=J,\ldots,1 apply Lemma 3.1 (real matrix discrepancy, ∥Aξ∥∞≤Cslog⁡(2R/s)\|A\xi\|_\infty\le C\sqrt{s\log(2R/s)} for A∈[−1,1]R×sA\in[-1,1]^{R\times s}, s≤Rs\le R) to the shs_h coordinates whose current value is an odd multiple of 2−h2^{-h}, reversing all signs if needed so the total mass does not grow. Since each active coordinate carries mass at least 2−h2^{-h}, sh≤min⁡(n,2hμ)s_h\le\min(n,2^h\mu), and monotonicity of slog⁡(80n/s)s\log(80n/s) makes the stage errors a geometric series summing to Cμlog⁡(80n/μ)C\sqrt{\mu\log(80n/\mu)}, so that with the truncation cost ∥A(p′−p)∥∞≤1+Cμlog⁡(80n/μ)\|A(p'-p)\|_\infty\le1+C\sqrt{\mu\log(80n/\mu)}. Setting ηj=dj(1−2pj′)\eta_j=d_j(1-2p_j'), the difference polynomial QQ obeys the bound at the grid points. To pass to the circle, with S=max⁡∣z∣=1∣Q∣S=\max_{|z|=1}|Q|, the maximum principle for QQ and its reversal bounds QQ on the disk of radius 1+1/n1+1/n by e⋅S\mathrm e\cdot S, Cauchy's estimate bounds the derivative along the circle by 2πe nS2\pi\mathrm e\,nS, and since every point is within 1/(40n)1/(40n) of the grid and πe/20<1\pi\mathrm e/20<1, the grid bound absorbs the supremum. A unimodular monomial factor handles shifted frequency intervals, and real inputs give dj=±1d_j=\pm1 and hence sign outputs.

Dependencies

Lemma 3.1 (real matrix discrepancy), quoted from the companion Nearly minimal maxima and positive minima of Littlewood polynomials, Lemma 6.2, which the companion derives from Spencer's partial-coloring method (Spencer 1985) and from Lovett and Meka's theorem for real vectors (Lovett--Meka 2015, Theorem 4 of arXiv:1203.5747v2); the maximum principle and Cauchy's estimate. External premises are taken at statement level; none was checked here.

Bears on

  • Problem 1150: reaches the problem only through Theorem 1, where it rounds the real normalized coefficients of Proposition 5.1 to the claimed signs. Unverified here; the page's status rests on acceptance evidence.