Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Stoll 2005 families nonlinear recurrences related digits

../

theorem_1_1: Rabinowitz and Gilbert's 1991 theorem as Stoll restates it in 2005: for every positive real w, a two-step floor recurrence with multipliers a and 2/a and both shifts 1/2 whose differences u_{2n+1} - 2u_{2n-1} are the binary digits of w; at w = sqrt 2 it is the Graham-Pollak recurrence.

theorem_1_2: Stoll's 2005 theorem giving, for every positive real w and every integer j at least 1, two floor recurrences of the Graham-Pollak type (Cases I and II) whose differences u_{2n+1} - 2u_{2n-1} are the binary digits of w; the case w = sqrt 2, j = 1, epsilon = 1/2 of Case I is the Graham-Pollak recurrence.

theorem_1_3: Stoll's 2005 theorem giving, for every positive real w and every integer base g at least 2, a floor recurrence of the Graham-Pollak type whose differences u_{2n+1} - g u_{2n-1} are the digits of w in base g; the paper's answer to Rabinowitz and Gilbert's question about ternary digits.


Th. Stoll, On families of nonlinear recurrences related to digits, J. Integer Seq. 8 (2005), Article 05.3.2, 8 pp. Received 1 April 2005, revised version received 12 May 2005, published 24 May 2005 (the dates printed on p. 8). The site's key St05.

The copy read for this card is the journal's PDF, 8 pages whose printed page numbers equal the PDF page numbers. Its text layer garbles the formulas (floor brackets, exponents and radicals), so the statements below were read on the rendered page images of pp. 2--4; the proofs (pp. 4--7) were read in the text layer for their structure. Source: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL8/Stoll/stoll56.html. No notice is printed in that PDF, and the journal's article page shows no copyright or license statement (https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL8/Stoll/stoll56.html, read 2026-10-02); the term is unstated.

Read status: claims checked for Fact 1, Theorem 1.1 (Rabinowitz and Gilbert's family, as the paper restates it), Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 and Corollaries 1.1 and 1.2, read clause by clause on the page images of pp. 2--4; the inductive proofs of Section 2 were read for structure and not checked.

Contents

  • Introduction (pp. 1--4). The Hwang--Lin sequence $1,2,3,4,6,9,13,19,27, 38,54,77,109,\ldots$ is defined by u1=1u_1=1, un+1=⌊2un(un+1)⌋u_{n+1}=\lfloor\sqrt{2u_n(u_n+1)}\rfloor (1), which the paper rewrites as un+1=⌊2(un+1/2)⌋u_{n+1}=\lfloor\sqrt2(u_n+1/2)\rfloor (2). Fact 1 (Graham and Pollak, p. 2): dn=u2n+1−2u2n−1d_n=u_{2n+1}-2u_{2n-1} is the nnth digit in the binary expansion of 2=(1.011010100…)2\sqrt2=(1.011010100\ldots)_2. OEIS A001521 (u1=1u_1=1), A091522 (u1=5u_1=5) and A091523 (u1=8u_1=8) are named. The paper reports (p. 2), citing Erdős and Graham at "[2, p. 96]", that they expected similar results "for m\sqrt m and other algebraic numbers" but had "no idea what they are", and that Rabinowitz and Gilbert answered in the binary case by a computational guessing approach. Theorem 1.1 (Rabinowitz and Gilbert, Math. Mag. 64 (1991), 168--171, as restated, p. 2): for w>0w>0, t=w/2mt=w/2^m with m=⌊log⁡2w⌋m=\lfloor\log_2w\rfloor, a=2(1−1/(t+2))a=2(1-1/(t+2)) and b=2/ab=2/a, the sequence u1=1u_1=1, un+1=⌊a(un+1/2)⌋u_{n+1}=\lfloor a(u_n+1/2)\rfloor for odd nn and ⌊b(un+1/2)⌋\lfloor b(u_n+1/2)\rfloor for even nn has u2n+1−2u2n−1u_{2n+1}-2u_{2n-1} equal to the nnth binary digit of ww; for w=2w=\sqrt2, a=b=2a=b=\sqrt2.
  • Theorem 1.2 (p. 3): for w>0w>0, t=w/2mt=w/2^m, m=⌊log⁡2w⌋m=\lfloor\log_2w\rfloor and any integer j≥1j\ge1, with a=2(j−1/(t+2))a=2(j-1/(t+2)), b=2/ab=2/a (Case I) or a=2j−t/(t+2)a=2j-t/(t+2), b=2/ab=2/a (Case II), the sequence u1=1u_1=1, un+1=⌊a(un+1/2)⌋u_{n+1}=\lfloor a(u_n+1/2)\rfloor for odd nn and ⌊b(un+ε)⌋\lfloor b(u_n+\varepsilon)\rfloor for even nn, with 1/3≤ε<2/31/3\le\varepsilon<2/3 in Case I and ε=1/2\varepsilon=1/2 in Case II, has u2n+1−2u2n−1u_{2n+1}-2u_{2n-1} equal to the nnth binary digit of ww.
  • Theorem 1.3 (p. 3): for w>0w>0 and an integer g≥2g\ge2, t=w/gmt=w/g^m with m=⌊log⁡gw⌋m=\lfloor\log_gw\rfloor, a=g/((g−1)(t+g))a=g/((g-1)(t+g)) and b=g/ab=g/a, the sequence u1=1u_1=1, un+1=⌊a(un+ε)⌋u_{n+1}=\lfloor a(u_n+\varepsilon)\rfloor for odd nn and ⌊b(un+1/(g−1))⌋\lfloor b(u_n+1/(g-1))\rfloor for even nn, with −1/g≤ε<(g+1)(g−2)/g-1/g\le\varepsilon<(g+1)(g-2)/g, has u2n+1−gu2n−1u_{2n+1}-gu_{2n-1} equal to the nnth digit of ww in base gg.
  • Corollary 1.1 (p. 4): with aj=j+(−1)j2a_j=j+(-1)^j\sqrt2 for j=0,2,3,…j=0,2,3,\ldots and bj=2/ajb_j=2/a_j, the recurrence u1=1u_1=1, un+1=⌊aj(un+1/2)⌋u_{n+1}=\lfloor a_j(u_n+1/2)\rfloor (odd nn), ⌊bj(un+1/2)⌋\lfloor b_j(u_n+1/2)\rfloor (even nn) gives the binary digits of 2\sqrt2; j=1j=1 is excluded (a1=1−2<0a_1=1-\sqrt2<0 and u5−2u3=3u_5-2u_3=3). Corollary 1.2 (p. 4): with a=(9−32)/14a=(9-3\sqrt2)/14 and b=6+22b=6+2\sqrt2 and the shift 1/21/2 on both steps, u2n+1−3u2n−1u_{2n+1}-3u_{2n-1} is the nnth ternary digit of 2=(1.102011221…)3\sqrt2=(1.102011221\ldots)_3 (the case g=3g=3, w=2w=\sqrt2, ε=1/2\varepsilon=1/2 of Theorem 1.3).
  • Section 2, Proofs (pp. 4--7). Proposition 2: for w=(d1d2d3…)gw=(d_1d_2d_3\ldots)_g with d1≠0d_1\ne0 and no tail of digits g−1g-1, t=(d1.d2d3…)gt=(d_1.d_2d_3\ldots)_g with 1≤t<g1\le t<g and dn=⌊tgn−1⌋−g⌊tgn−2⌋d_n=\lfloor tg^{n-1}\rfloor-g\lfloor tg^{n-2}\rfloor. Theorem 1.2 is proved by induction on closed forms for u2ku_{2k} and u2k+1u_{2k+1} (Case I: u2k=2k−1+⌊t2k−1⌋+(j−1)(2k+2⌊t2k−2⌋+1)u_{2k}=2^{k-1}+\lfloor t2^{k-1}\rfloor+(j-1)(2^k+2\lfloor t2^{k-2}\rfloor+1), u2k+1=2k+⌊t2k−1⌋u_{2k+1}=2^k+\lfloor t2^{k-1}\rfloor), and Theorem 1.3 by the closed forms u2k=(gk−1−1)/(g−1)u_{2k}=(g^{k-1}-1)/(g-1), u2k+1=gk+⌊tgk−1⌋u_{2k+1}=g^k+\lfloor tg^{k-1}\rfloor; the paper notes that in Case II the shift ε=1/2\varepsilon=1/2 cannot be replaced by any other value.
  • The acknowledgment (p. 7) thanks the referee "for pointing out several inaccuracies in the statement of the results" of the original manuscript; the copy read is the published revised version.

Compiled scope

The whole article was read (pp. 1--4 on the page images, pp. 4--8 in the text layer). Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 are compiled as statements with proof pointers; no step of the proofs was checked and nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #482, whose first paragraph is the Graham--Pollak identity (Fact 1 here) and whose second asks for similar results for m\sqrt m and other algebraic numbers; the site's commentary cites this paper and Stoll's 2006 paper. Theorem 1.1 restates Rabinowitz and Gilbert's binary recurrence for every positive real ww; Theorem 1.2 gives, for every positive real ww, two infinite families of recurrences of the Graham--Pollak shape whose differences u2n+1−2u2n−1u_{2n+1}-2u_{2n-1} are the binary digits of ww; Theorem 1.3 gives, for every positive real ww and every integer base g≥2g\ge2, one pair of multipliers aa, g/ag/a and a range of shifts ε\varepsilon giving such recurrences whose differences u2n+1−gu2n−1u_{2n+1}-gu_{2n-1} are the base-gg digits of ww. None of them classifies the recurrences with this property. Corollary 1.1 recovers Fact 1 as the case j=0j=0.

Results.

  • Theorem 1.1 (p. 2): Rabinowitz and Gilbert's binary-digit recurrence for every w>0w>0, as the paper restates it.
  • Theorem 1.2 (p. 3): two infinite families (Cases I and II, indexed by j≥1j\ge1) of binary-digit recurrences for every w>0w>0.
  • Theorem 1.3 (p. 3): a gg-ary-digit recurrence for every w>0w>0 and every integer g≥2g\ge2.
  • Corollaries 1.1 and 1.2 (p. 4): the specializations to 2\sqrt2 in bases 22 and 33.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.