Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Theorem 5.4, p. 13, of Mikhail Neklyudov, Functional analysis approach to the Collatz conjecture, arXiv:2106.11859v9 (2022), published in Results Math. 79 (2024), no. 4, Paper No. 140, in the edition identified on the source card.

Statement

T\mathcal T is the operator with T(zn)=zT(n)\mathcal T(z^n)=z^{T(n)} for the reduced Collatz map TT, as on the Lemma 1.1 page, A(D)A(D) the space of analytic functions on the open unit disc, and g(z)=g(1,z)=∑p≥0z2pg(z)=g(1,z)=\sum_{p\ge0}z^{2^p} the lacunary series of (2.3) (p. 4).

Theorem 5.4 (p. 13). The function

FP2=g22+z−g(z)+∑k=1∞((z+z2)g(z3k)−g(z1+3k)−g(z2+3k))(5.3)FP_2=\frac{g^2}2+z-g(z)+\sum_{k=1}^\infty\Bigl(\bigl(z+z^2\bigr)g\bigl(z^{3^k}\bigr) -g\bigl(z^{1+3^k}\bigr)-g\bigl(z^{2+3^k}\bigr)\Bigr)\qquad(5.3)

belongs to A(D)A(D) and is a fixed point of T\mathcal T.

The paper presents it as a fixed point different from those built in Theorem 2.3 (p. 13).

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on p. 13; the proof on pp. 13--14 was read through, not checked step by step.

Proof pointer

Pages 13--14. The estimates (5.4) and (5.5) give locally uniform convergence in DD. The fixed-point property comes from Lemma 5.3 (p. 13), which computes T\mathcal T on functions Ψl,mk\Psi^k_{l,m} attached to the integers of the form l+mnl+mn with nn having exactly kk ones in binary, combined with the identity (2.4) at λ=1\lambda=1 and a limit over partial sums.

Dependencies

Lemma 5.3 and formula (2.4) of the same paper.

Bears on

No Erdős problem page cites it. Remark 5.5 (p. 14) notes that this fixed point and those of Theorem 2.3 are analytic in the disc, while the cycle polynomials are entire, and asks whether T\mathcal T has an entire fixed point other than z+z2z+z^2; the paper says a negative answer would imply that there are no nontrivial cycles.