Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Lemma 1.1, p. 2, of Mikhail Neklyudov, Functional analysis approach to the Collatz conjecture, arXiv:2106.11859v9 (2022), published in Results Math. 79 (2024), no. 4, Paper No. 140, in the edition identified on the source card.

Statement

Throughout, T:Z→ZT:\mathbb Z\to\mathbb Z is the reduced Collatz map, T(n)=(3n+1)/2T(n)=(3n+1)/2 for odd nn and T(n)=n/2T(n)=n/2 for even nn, and T\mathcal T is the linear operator with T(zn)=zT(n)\mathcal T(z^n)=z^{T(n)}, given on the Bergman space Hber2(D)H^2_{ber}(D) of the open unit disc DD by Tf(z)=(Sf)(z)+z (Af)(z3/2)\mathcal Tf(z)=(Sf)(\sqrt z)+\sqrt z\,(Af)(z^{3/2}), where SfSf and AfAf are the even and odd parts of ff (p. 2).

Lemma 1.1 (p. 2). If (n1,…,nk)(n_1,\dots,n_k) is a cycle of TT, then ∑i=1kzni\sum_{i=1}^k z^{n_i} is a fixed point of T\mathcal T. Further, a polynomial fixed point of T\mathcal T has this form up to an element of the kernel of T\mathcal T, which the paper computes in (2.1) (p. 3) as the span of the binomials z2k+1−z6k+4z^{2k+1}-z^{6k+4}, k≥0k\ge0, there for T\mathcal T acting on Hber2(D)/XH^2_{ber}(D)/X with X=span⁡{1,z,z2}X=\operatorname{span}\{1,z,z^2\}.

For the trivial cycle {1,2}\{1,2\} the fixed point is z+z2z+z^2.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on p. 2.

Proof pointer

The paper calls the proof trivial and omits it (p. 2). The first part is the identity T(zni)=zT(ni)=zni+1\mathcal T(z^{n_i})=z^{T(n_i)}=z^{n_{i+1}} around the cycle.

Dependencies

None.

Bears on

  • #1135: the lemma turns cycles of the problem's map ff (the paper's TT on the positive integers) into fixed points of a linear operator; it says nothing about which cycles exist.