Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Erdos 1990 characterization unique expansions related problems

../

problem_4: The 1990 open problem of Erdős, Joó and Komornik asking for the bases q in (1, 2) whose ordered finite sums of distinct powers have gaps tending to 0, and whether every q sufficiently close to 1 has this property; the question of Problem 1096 in its authors' words, one year before the problem session the site names.

theorem_1: The 1990 Erdős-Joó-Komornik characterization of expansions of 1 with digits 0 and 1 in a base 1 < q < 2: an expansion is the greedy one exactly when every shift that follows a 0 digit is lexicographically below the whole digit sequence, and the unique one when moreover every complemented shift that follows a 1 digit is also below it.

theorem_2: The 1990 Erdős-Joó-Komornik estimate on runs of digits: the bases q in (1, 2) for which, for arbitrarily large m, the first m digits of the greedy expansion of 1 contain more than log_2 m consecutive 0 digits form a residual set of full measure, and likewise for runs of 1 digits in the lazy expansion of 1.

theorem_3: The 1990 Erdős-Joó-Komornik extension of an earlier result on expansions of 1: for a base q between 1 and the golden ratio, every x strictly between 0 and 1/(q-1) has 2^aleph_0 different expansions with digits 0 and 1.

theorem_4: The 1990 Erdős-Joó-Komornik theorem on the increasing sequence y_1 < y_2 < ... of finite sums of distinct powers of q, 1 < q < 2: consecutive gaps are at most 1; they equal 1 infinitely often when q exceeds the golden ratio; gaps tending to 0 force an infinite expansion of 1 with arbitrarily long zero runs; and for the Pisot root of q^3 = q^2 + 1 the gaps do not tend to 0. The source of Problem 1096's "x_{k+1} - x_k <= 1" and its Pisot obstruction.


Erdős, Pál and Joó, István and Komornik, Vilmos, Characterization of the unique expansions 1=∑i=1∞q−ni1=\sum^\infty_{i=1}q^{-n_i} and related problems. Bull. Soc. Math. France 118 (1990), no. 3, 377--390; DOI 10.24033/bsmf.2151 (the Crossref record). "Texte reçu le 21 mai 1990, révisé le 21 juin 1990" (p. 377). The site's key EJK90.

The copy read for this card is the Numdam file: a cover page followed by the fourteen printed pages (printed p. nn is PDF p. n−375n-375), with an OCR text layer that garbles the formulas, so the statements below were read on the rendered page images of printed pp. 377, 386, 387, 389 and 390, and those of pp. 378--385 on 2026-10-07. Source: http://www.numdam.org/item/BSMF_1990__118_3_377_0/. The file prints "© Bulletin de la S. M. F., 1990, tous droits réservés." and "ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright" on its Numdam cover page (PDF p. 1) and "© Société mathématique de France" in the footer of PDF p. 2, every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked for Theorems 1--3 with Remark 1 (pp. 378--386), Theorem 4 with Remark 2, the recall on Pisot numbers and the proof of assertion d), and Problems 1--6, read clause by clause on the page images of pp. 386 and 389--390; the proof of Theorem 4 a) (p. 387) was read for structure and not checked; the lemmas of Sections 1--2 are not consumed, and their statements in the import digest below were checked against the page images of pp. 378--386 on 2026-10-07; the proofs of Theorems 1--3 were not checked.

For 1 < q < 2 the paper studies expansions x = sum eps_i q^{-i} with digits eps_i in {0,1}, using the lexicographic order to identify the greedy (largest) and lazy (smallest) expansions; x has a unique expansion exactly when these coincide. Theorem 1 characterizes expansions of 1: (1) is the greedy expansion iff the shifted digit sequence (eps_{k+i}) is lexicographically below (eps_i) whenever eps_k = 0, and it is the unique expansion iff additionally the complemented shift (1 - eps_{k+i}) is lexicographically below (eps_i) whenever eps_k = 1. Lemma 1 supplies the corresponding criteria for general x in terms of sum eps_{k+i} q^{-i} < 1 and sum (1-eps_{k+i}) q^{-i} < 1. Section 2 sharpens an earlier almost-every-q result by giving an explicit estimate for the length of blocks of consecutive zero digits in the greedy expansion of 1, with an analog for lazy expansions; Section 3 generalizes further earlier results and relates the properties to Pisot numbers. The paper is a source for problem 1096 on the gaps of the ordered sums of distinct powers of q: its Section 3 introduces that sequence, proves the gap bound yn+1−yn≤1y_{n+1}-y_n\le1 and the Pisot obstruction, and its Problem 4 asks the problem's question (the site's other source for it is the 1991 problem session of Great Western Number Theory, not held).

Contents

  • Section 0 (pp. 377--378): expansions x=∑i≥1εiq−ix=\sum_{i\ge1}\varepsilon_iq^{-i} with digits in {0,1}\{0,1\} exist exactly for 0≤x≤1/(q−1)0\le x\le1/(q-1); the lexicographic order; greedy and lazy expansions; the plan of the paper.
  • Sections 1--2 (pp. 378--385): Theorem 1 (pp. 378--379; the lexicographic characterization of greedy and unique expansions of 1), Remark 1, Lemmas 1--4 (pp. 379--383), Theorem 2 (p. 383; the zero-block estimate), Lemmas 5--6 (pp. 383--384).
  • Section 3 (pp. 385--389): Theorem 3 (p. 386; for 1<q<A=(1+5)/21<q<A=(1+\sqrt5)/2 every 0<x<1/(q−1)0<x<1/(q-1) has 2ℵ02^{\aleph_0} expansions); then, for a fixed 1<q<21<q<2, the section's main object is the increasing sequence 0=y1<y2<⋯0=y_1<y_2<\cdots of all real numbers that can be written as qn1+qn2+⋯+qnkq^{n_1}+q^{n_2}+\cdots+q^{n_k} for some finite set of distinct nonnegative integers njn_j, with y1:=0y_1:=0 by definition. The authors note that yn→∞y_n\to\infty and study the gaps yn+1−yny_{n+1}-y_n. Theorem 4 [EJK90, Theorem 4, p. 386]: a) "yn+1−yn≤1y_{n+1}-y_n\le1 for all n≥1n\ge1"; b) "If q>Aq>A, then yn+1−yn=1y_{n+1}-y_n=1 for infinitely many nn"; c) "If yn+1−yn→0y_{n+1}-y_n\to0, then 11 has an infinite expansion containing arbitrarily long sequences of consecutive 00 digits"; d) "There exists 1<q<A1<q<A for which yn+1−yn↛0y_{n+1}-y_n\not\to0". Remark 2: yn+1−yn→0y_{n+1}-y_n\to0 holds for q=21/mq=2^{1/m}, m≥2m\ge2. Proof of d) (p. 389): recalled from [8], [9] that for a Pisot number 1<q<21<q<2 no expansion of 11 contains arbitrarily long runs of zeros unless it is finite; the real zero of q3−q2−1q^3-q^2-1 is a Pisot number below AA with the finite expansion 1=q−1+q−31=q^{-1}+q^{-3} and, by Theorem 3, infinite expansions too; c) then gives yn+1−yn↛0y_{n+1}-y_n\not\to0.
  • Open problems (pp. 389--390): Problem 4 (p. 389): "Characterize the set of those 1<q<21<q<2 for which yn+1−yn→0y_{n+1}-y_n\to0. Is it true that every qq which is sufficiently close to 11 has this property?" Problems 1--3 and 5--6 concern lazy expansions, finite expansions above AA, the constant log⁡2m\log_2m of Theorem 2, and runs of 00 digits in greedy expansions and of 11 digits in lazy ones.

Compiled scope

Section 3 and the open problems were read on the page images; Theorem 4 and Problem 4 are compiled as pages with the proof pointer and the origin reading. Theorems 1--3, the paper's other main results, are compiled as statement pages with proof pointers, their statements checked against the page images. The lemmas stay at the import digest's depth. No step was checked and nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #1096: Theorem 4 a) is the statement the site attributes to this paper, xk+1−xk≤1x_{k+1}-x_k\le1 for all kk (the paper's yny_n is the problem's xnx_n); the Pisot obstruction the site also attributes to it appears here through c) and the proof of d), which exclude one Pisot number (q3=q2+1q^3=q^2+1); since the fact recalled from [8], [9] says that in a Pisot base no infinite expansion of 11 has arbitrarily long runs of 00 digits, c) with that fact excludes every Pisot number in (1,2)(1,2), a consequence the paper does not state as a theorem; the proof of d) gives that Pisot base infinite expansions of 11 from its 2ℵ02^{\aleph_0} expansions of 11, justified in the print only by "(because q<Aq<A)", the case x=1x=1 of Theorem 3 and the result recalled from [5]; Problem 4 is the problem's question in the authors' own words, posed in 1990.

Results to transcribe.

  • Theorem 1 (pp. 378--379): For 1 = sum eps_i q^{-i} with eps_i in {0,1}: it is the greedy expansion iff (eps_{k+i}) < (eps_i) lexicographically whenever eps_k = 0, and the unique expansion iff also (1-eps_{k+i}) < (eps_i) whenever eps_k = 1.
  • Remark 1: If the expansion of 1 is greedy (resp. unique) then the corresponding lexicographic condition holds for every k >= 1.
  • Lemma 1: An expansion x = sum eps_i q^{-i} is greedy iff sum_i eps_{k+i} q^{-i} < 1 whenever eps_k = 0, and lazy iff sum_i (1-eps_{k+i}) q^{-i} < 1 whenever eps_k = 1.
  • Theorem 2 (p. 383): for a residual set of q of full measure in (1,2), there are arbitrarily large m such that the first m digits of the greedy expansion of 1 contain more than log_2 m consecutive 0 digits, improving the almost-every-q result that such blocks are arbitrarily long; the analog holds for runs of 1 digits in the lazy expansion of 1.
  • Theorem 3 (p. 386): for 1<q<A1<q<A every 0<x<1/(q−1)0<x<1/(q-1) has 2ℵ02^{\aleph_0} expansions.
  • Theorem 4 (p. 386): the gap bound yn+1−yn≤1y_{n+1}-y_n\le1, the value 11 infinitely often for q>Aq>A, the zero-run consequence of yn+1−yn→0y_{n+1}-y_n\to0, and a Pisot q<Aq<A with gaps not tending to 00.
  • Problem 4 (p. 389): the gap question of Problem 1096.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.