Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Li 2026 resolution erdos problem 768 sylow divisor
theorem_1_1: Li's main theorem that, for the count A(x) of n up to x satisfying the Sylow divisor condition, log(x/A(x))/(sqrt(log x) log log x) tends to 1/(2 sqrt(log 2)), so A(x)/x = exp(-(c+o(1)) sqrt(log x) log log x) with c = 1/(2 sqrt(log 2)).
theorem_4_3: Li's constructive lower bound for the count A(x) of n up to x satisfying the Sylow divisor condition: A(x) is at least x exp(-(1/(2 sqrt(log 2)) + o(1)) sqrt(log x) log log x) as x tends to infinity.
theorem_8_3: Li's upper bound for the count A(x) of n up to x satisfying the Sylow divisor condition: A(x) is at most x exp(-(1/(2 sqrt(log 2)) + o(1)) sqrt(log x) log log x) as x tends to infinity.
Eric Li, A Resolution of Erdős Problem 768: the Sylow Divisor Condition. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2606.24872v2 (13 July 2026; version 1 is dated 23 June 2026). The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:2606.24872), every other right reserved.
Let A(x) count n <= x such that every prime p dividing n admits a divisor d > 1 of n with d congruent to 1 mod p (the Sylow divisor condition, satisfied by all orders of nonabelian finite simple groups). Theorem 1.1 proves that the limit of log(x/A(x))/(sqrt(log x) log log x) exists and equals 1/(2 sqrt(log 2)), so the form Erdős asked about, A(x)/x = exp(-(c+o(1)) sqrt(log x) log log x), holds with c = 1/(2 sqrt(log 2)). The lower bound (Theorem 4.3) is constructive: primes are placed in disjoint logarithmic intervals, a fourth-moment argument based on the multiplicative large sieve (Theorem 2.6) discards the target primes at which a layer has a large character sum, and a subset-product second moment (Lemma 3.1, closed by Chebyshev's inequality) shows all but a proportion o(1) of the resulting integers satisfy the condition. The upper bound (Theorem 8.3) uses canonical witness divisors D_p(n) = min{d | n : d > 1, d = 1 mod p}, a deterministic compression of n whose fibers are controlled by recovering n from a short record (Proposition 6.7, with fiber bounds Propositions 6.9 and 6.11; Proposition 7.2 bounds the compression divisor from below), and growing divisor moments. The author reports that Theorem 1.1 is formalized and machine-checked in Lean 4 (toolchain and Mathlib v4.28.0) as Erdos768.erdos_768, which in the paper's words carries no hypotheses and has no sorry in its dependency graph, with the analytic input drawn from the PrimeNumberTheoremAnd MediumPNT theorem; the paper also discloses extensive LLM assistance in the research and that the formalization was produced with Harmonic's Aristotle. For problem 768 the paper claims a full resolution, the exact conjectural asymptotic with an explicit constant; the claim is unreviewed (see the problem's claim page). The author reports a Lean 4 formalization produced with Aristotle; a forum user reported rebuilding it and checking its axioms; nothing was built or audited here.
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24872.
Read status: claims checked for Theorems 1.1, 4.3 and 8.3, read clause by clause on the page images of the print, with the proofs of Theorems 4.3 and 8.3 followed in outline. Nothing here is independently reviewed. Result pages: theorem_1_1, theorem_4_3 and theorem_8_3.
Bears on. #768: Theorem 1.1 (p. 1) states that tends to , which is the problem's asymptotic with that constant, and the paper says it gives a complete answer to the problem (p. 2); its two halves are Theorem 4.3 (p. 10) and Theorem 8.3 (p. 19). The claim and its standing are recorded on the problem's claim page.
Results.
- Theorem 1.1 (p. 1): the limit of exists and equals , so the form holds with .
- Theorem 4.3 (p. 10): the constructive lower bound , from primes in disjoint logarithmic intervals and subset products.
- Theorem 8.3 (p. 19): the matching upper bound , from canonical witnesses, compression and divisor moments.
Inputs recorded on those pages rather than on pages of their own: Theorem 2.6 (p. 5), the Bombieri--Davenport multiplicative large sieve, cited in the paper and, the paper says, proved from first principles in the Lean formalization; Propositions 6.7, 6.9 and 6.11 (pp. 14--15), the reconstruction and fiber bounds for the compression map; and Proposition 7.2 (p. 16), the lower bound for the compression divisor.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.