Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Grynkiewicz 2011 note conjecture graham

../

theorem_3_4: Graham's conjecture for every finite abelian group: a sequence of n terms of a group of order n with exactly one length r for which some r terms sum to zero has at most two distinct terms, and must have one of the forms the theorem lists.


D. J. Grynkiewicz, Note on a conjecture of Graham, European J. Combin. 32 (2011), no. 8, 1336--1344, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2011.06.004; arXiv:0903.3200. The site's page for Problem 541 did not cite this paper when read on 2026-10-07; a comment of 14 April 2026 in the problem's discussion thread cites it as [Gr11], linking the journal article, and calls it an easy proof of the Erdős--Szemerédi theorem from the Cauchy--Davenport theorem and the pigeonhole principle.

The copy read for this card is the arXiv preprint, version 1 of 18 March 2009 (the only version listed; the stamp reads "arXiv:0903.3200v1 [math.CO] 18 Mar 2009"): eleven typeset pages with a full text layer, PDF pp. 1--11 = the preprint's pp. 1--11. The journal's pagination (1336--1344) is not attached to its pages, and the journal text was not compared, so the theorem and lemma labels below are the preprint's. Provenance: retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/0903.3200 (HTTP 200, one request); 169,600 bytes. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:0903.3200), every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked for Conjecture 1.1 (p. 1) and Theorem 3.4 (p. 5) and the paragraph introducing it, read clause by clause on the page images, and for the abstract and the introduction's account of the proof (pp. 1--2) on the page images; the notation of Section 2 and the lemmas of Section 3 were read on the page images. The proof of Theorem 3.4 (pp. 6--10) and the remark on the prime case (p. 10) were read through for structure, not checked step by step; nothing here is independently reviewed.

Contents

  • Introduction (pp. 1--2). Conjecture 1.1 (Graham; p. 1): "Let CpC_p be the cyclic group of order pp prime and let SS a sequence over CpC_p of length pp. If all (nontrivial) zero-sum subsequences of SS are of the same length, then the number of distinct terms in SS is at most 2." The paper recounts that Erdős and Szemerédi proved it in 1976 for sufficiently large primes, with the small primes never worked out and the complexity of the proof "lamented" in that paper and in the Erdős--Graham survey; that Gao, Hamidoune and Wang recently gave a proof valid for every nn through Savchev and Chen's structure theorem for long zero-sum free sequences in CnC_n; and that the present paper gives, in the abstract's words (p. 1), "a short proof of the original conjecture that uses only the Cauchy-Davenport Theorem and pigeonhole principle", with an alternate proof for the non-prime case through the DeVos--Goddyn--Mohar theorem, and an exhaustive description of the sequences.
  • Section 2, notation (pp. 2--3): sumsets, stabilizers, sequences as elements of the free abelian monoid F(G)\mathcal F(G), Σn(S)\Sigma_n(S) the set of nn-term subsequence sums, the Cauchy--Davenport and DeVos--Goddyn--Mohar theorems, Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 2.2.
  • Section 3, the main result (pp. 4--10): Lemmas 3.1--3.3, then Theorem 3.4 (p. 5): "Let GG be a finite abelian group of order nn and let S∈F(G)S\in\mathcal F(G) with ∣S∣=n|S|=n. Suppose there is a unique r∈[1,n]r\in[1,n] such that 0∈Σr(S)0\in\Sigma_r(S). Then ∣supp(S)∣≤2|\mathrm{supp}(S)|\le2." The theorem continues with the forms SS can take (stated as necessary conditions): for non-cyclic GG, G≅C2⊕C2mG\cong C_2\oplus C_{2m} with r=n/2=2mr=n/2=2m and SS of one of three shapes; for cyclic GG there is a generator gg with S=gn−1g′S=g^{n-1}g' for some g′∈Gg'\in G or S=(2g)n−1g′′S=(2g)^{n-1}g'' for some g′′∈G∖⟨2g⟩g''\in G\setminus\langle2g\rangle, or nn odd, r=(n+1)/2r=(n+1)/2 and S=gn−2(n+12g)2S=g^{n-2}(\tfrac{n+1}2g)^2, or n≡2(mod4)n\equiv2\pmod4, r=n/2r=n/2 and S=(2g)n/2+x(n+42g)n/2−xS=(2g)^{n/2+x}(\tfrac{n+4}2g)^{n/2-x} with x∈[0,n/2−1]x\in[0,n/2-1] even, or nn even, r=n/2r=n/2 and S=gn/2+x(n+22g)n/2−xS=g^{n/2+x}(\tfrac{n+2}2g)^{n/2-x} with x∈[0,n/2−1]x\in[0,n/2-1] and n/2−xn/2-x odd. The paragraph before the theorem says that the remark following its proof explains the simplification for G=CpG=C_p with pp prime, "including the use of the Cauchy-Davenport Theorem in place of Devos-Goddyn-Mohar", and that most non-cyclic groups admit no such sequence since 2D(G)≤∣G∣2\mathsf D(G)\le|G|. The proof runs in four labeled steps (pp. 6--10), with the prime-case simplification on p. 10. Result page: theorem_3_4.

Compiled scope

The paper is compiled as a source for Problem 541; Theorem 3.4 is recorded at claims checked from the page image, on its result page theorem_3_4. Lemmas 3.1--3.3, Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 are tools of its proof and have no pages of their own.

Bears on. #541: cited as [Gr11] in the problem's discussion thread. Theorem 3.4 with G=CpG=C_p is the problem's statement for every prime pp (and with G=CnG=C_n for every modulus nn), with the residue 00 admitted: a sequence of pp residues in which every nonempty zero-sum subsequence has the same length rr has at most two distinct values. It covers the same statement as Gao, Hamidoune and Wang's Theorem 1.1 by a different route, and adds a list of the forms such sequences take; its proof for prime pp is the "easy proof" the thread names and the argument the external Lean file's header says its own proof is closer to.

No file of this source is held: the license on record for the preprint read does not permit its redistribution, and the card cites that edition. The Crossref record lists CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 for the journal version from 16 July 2013; that version was not read.