Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Verstraete 2004 number sets cycle lengths
theorem_1_2: Some absolute positive constant c makes the number of cycle sets on {1,...,n}, the sets of cycle lengths of graphs on n vertices, o(2^{n-n^c}); this proves Erdos's conjecture, the paper's Conjecture 1.1, that the number is o(2^n).
J. Verstraëte, On the number of sets of cycle lengths, Combinatorica 24 (2004), no. 4, 719--730, DOI 10.1007/s00493-004-0043-6. The year and pages are the site's entry as carried by #84; the volume, issue and DOI are the Crossref record's (read; it gives no pages); the preprint read for this card carries no journal data.
The copy read for this card is an undated author preprint of 15 pages on letter paper, written from the Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Cambridge, and produced with Aladdin Ghostscript 6.0 from Type 3 bitmap fonts, so its text layer is unusable; the pages cited below were read as rendered images. The journal version was not compared, so its labels and text may differ. Provenance: obtained in September 2026 through a survey download whose URL was not recorded. 206,841 bytes. No copyright or license line is printed on the first or last page of the author's preprint, read as rendered images since the text layer is a garbled font encoding; no download URL is recorded for it, and the journal's page describes the published version rather than the preprint, so it was not consulted; the term is unstated.
Read status: claims checked for Theorem 1.2 and Conjecture 1.1 (p. 2), read on the page image; the proof (sections 2--4, pp. 3--14) was read for structure only, its estimates not re-derived; p. 15 is the reference list. The page of Problem 84 and its claim page consume Theorem 1.2, recorded on its result page, Theorem 1.2.
Contents
- Definitions (pp. 1--2): is the set of cycle lengths of ; a set of integers is a cycle set on if for some graph on vertices. Pages 1--2 recall that minimum degree gives , the Bondy--Vince result on the arithmetic of (p. 1), the author's earlier result that average degree at least gives consecutive even cycle lengths, and the Gyárfás--Komlós--Szemerédi result on the density of (p. 2).
- Conjecture 1.1 (p. 2; Erdős [5]): "The number of cycle sets on is ." Denley studied it for classes of graphs, and the author's earlier work gives it for graphs of average degree at least (p. 2).
- Theorem 1.2 (p. 2): "There exists an absolute positive constant such that the number of cycle sets on is ." The abstract (p. 1) states , and the proof closes (p. 14) with ; the result page notes that the bound printed for the graphs of circumference below (p. 13) is a big- one, so the proof as printed gives the little- form for each fixed .
- Lower bounds (pp. 2--3): vertex-disjoint cycles give about the partition function cycle sets; the graphs , a -cycle with chords from one vertex chosen by , are stated to satisfy and so to give at least distinct cycle sets on vertices, and Faudree's variant at least ; the author asks for , if it exists, where counts the cycle sets on , and notes that the examples make it at least (p. 3). A note made here: the first equation fails as printed in the preprint, since the chord also closes the odd cycle of length (for the odd cycle lengths are and ), so the count does not follow from it; Faudree's graphs, with chords for , have exactly the cycle lengths in (the equation printed for them, over , fails since itself has length ), so the bound stands.
- Section 2 (pp. 3--7): counting subsets of that contain a large positive difference set (Lemma 2.3, p. 5) or a translate of a large set of subset sums (Lemma 2.5, p. 7).
- Section 3 (pp. 7--13): ladders and the type graphs in Hamiltonian graphs and the cycle-length structure they force (Lemmas 3.1--3.5, Corollary 3.6).
- Section 4 (pp. 13--14): the proof of Theorem 1.2.
Compiled scope
Pages 1--3 were read clause by clause on the page images, and the proof on pp. 3--14 for structure; one result page is compiled, for Theorem 1.2. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Bears on. #84: Theorem 1.2 proves the page's first assertion, , in the stronger form for some absolute . Faudree's construction on p. 2 gives , that is for even , a lower bound of the order ; it does not give the divergence that the page's second assertion asks, which the paper does not address.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.